Validation of the DSP2 Tool in a Contemporary Identified Skeletal Collection from Northeastern Brazil
- 1 Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology (CEAF), University of Pernambuco/UPE, Camaragibe, Brazil
- 2 Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology (CEAF), University of Pernambuco/UPE, Camaragibe, Brazil
- 3 Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology (CEAF), University of Pernambuco/UPE, Camaragibe, Brazil
- 4 Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology (CEAF), University of Pernambuco/UPE, Camaragibe, Brazil
- 5 Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- 6 Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology (CEAF), University of Pernambuco/UPE, Camaragibe, Brazil
Abstract
The Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste v.2 (DSP2) is an accurate tool used for estimating the sex of an individual through the os coxae. The goal of this study was to verify the applicability of the DSP2 tool in a skeletal sample from Northeastern Brazil and to attest for its precision, accuracy, and reliability. The sample was composed of 301 os coxae from the Center for Studies in Forensic Anthropology of the College of Odontology from the University of Pernambuco, in Pernambuco, Brazil. The results reveal that it was possible to correctly estimate the sex of 83.7% of the total sample. The error rate was 0.4%, and the percentage of undetermined individuals varied according to the combination of measurements used. The results demonstrated a high index of accuracy and a low error rate, indicating that DSP2 is a reliable tool for sex estimation applied to this studied Brazilian population.
- Brůžek, J., & Murail, P. (2006). Methodology and Reliability of Sex Determination from the Skeleton. In A. Schmitt, E. Cunha, & J. Pinheiro (Eds.), Forensic Anthropology and Medicine: Complementary Sciences from Recovery to Cause of Death (pp. 225-242). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc.
- Brůžek, J., Santos, F., Dutailly, B., Murail, P, & Cunha, E. (2017). Validation and Reliability of the Sex Estimation of the Human Os Coxae Using Freely Available DSP2 Software for Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 164, 440-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23282
- Chapman, T., Lefevre, P., Semal, P., Moiseev, F., Sholukha V., Louryan, S., Rooze, M., & Van Sint Jan, S. (2014). Sex Determination Using the Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis (DSP: Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste) Tool in a Virtual Environment. Forensic Science International, 234, 189.e1-189.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.10.037
- Krishan, K., Chatterjee, P. M., Kanchan, T., Kaur, S., Baryah, N., & Singh, R. (2016). A Review of Sex Estimation Techniques during Examination of Skeletal Remains in Forensic Anthropology Casework. Forensic Science International, 261, 165.e1-165.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.007
- Machado, M. P., Costa, S., Freire, A., Navega, D., Cunha, E., Daruge Junior, E., Prado, F., & Rossi, A. C. (2018). Application and Validation of Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste V2 Tool in a Miscegenated Population. Forensic Science International, 290, 351.e1-351.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.043
- Mestekova, S., Brůžek, J., Valeminska, J., & Chaumoitre, K. (2015). A Test of the DSP Sexing Method on CT Images from a Modern French Sample. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60, 1295-1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12817
- Murail, P., Brůžek, J., Houët, F., & Cunha, E. (2005). DSP: A Tool for Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis Using Worldwide Variability in Hip-Bone Measurements. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, 17, 167-176.
- Oliveira, O. F., Tinoco, R. L. R., Daruge Júnior, E., Terada, A. S. S. D., Silva, R. H. A., & Paranhos L. R. (2012). Sexual Dimorphism in Brazilian Human Skulls: Discriminant Function Analysis. Journal of Forensic Odontostomatology, 30, 26-33.
- Quatrehomme, G., Radoman, I., Nogueira, L., du Jardin, P., & Alunni, V. (2017). Sex Determination Using the DSP (Probabilistic Sex Diagnosis) Method on the Coxal Bone: Efficiency of Method According to Number of Available Variables. Forensic Science International, 272, 190-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.020