Background: Consanguinity is a traditional phenomenon that is common in many communities worldwide. In Arab countries, its prevalence is considered to be high, despite its decrease in some Arab societies. According to the Arab soc iety in Israel, the rates of consanguineous marriages ( CMs ) recently were found to be increasing in the last decade. Generally, various socio-demographic factors play an important role in determining the prevalence rates of consanguineous marriages. Objective: The purpose of the current study is to determine the prevalence rates of consanguineous marriages among the Arab society in Israel, relating to various women’s socio-demographic factors. The study explored the effect of wives’ age at marriage, their educational attainment, their employment, and their income level on consanguinity in this community. Method: The data were obtained from a health national survey that was carried out during the year 2017, among the Arab society in Israel. The subjects supplied the required information about themselves through personal face-to-face interviews using a survey questionnaire prepared specifically for this purpose. A detailed analysis was conducted to determine statistical significance. Result: It was observed that the prevalence rate of consanguineous marriages among the women from the Arab society in Israel seems to be high (~42%). Furthermore, the prevalence rates of CMs were found to be inversely proportional to the wife’s age at marriage and their educational attainment. A significant difference could be detected between the rates of CMs and non-CMs in relation to wife’s employment factor and wife’s income level ( i.e. , 70% of the employed women had non-CMs and 65% of the high wife’s income level had non-CMs). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that women’s status played a vital role i n the prevalence rates of CMs, thus, we recommend the improvement of the various women-related socio-demographic factors.
KeywordsConsanguinityWomen’s StatusSocio-Demographic FactorsPrevalence RateArab Society in Israel
Abdalla, B., & Zaher, A. (2013). Consanguineous Marriages in the Middle East: Nature versus Nurture. The Open Complementary Medicine Journal, 5, 1-10.
Akrami, S. M., & Osati, Z. (2007). Is Consanguineous Marriage Religiously Encouraged? Islamic and Iranian Considerations. Journal of Biosocial Science, 39, 313-316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932006001684
Al Gharaibeh, F., & Bromfield, N. F. (2012). An Analysis of Divorce Cases in the United Arab Emirates: A Rising Trend. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.682896
Al-Arrayed, S., & Hamamy, H. (2012). The Changing Profile of Consanguinity Rates in Bahrain, 1990-2009. Journal of Biosocial Science, 44, 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932011000666
Al-Kandari, Y. Y., & Al-Kandari, Y. Y. (2018). Consanguineous Marriage and Its Relationship with Sociocultural Variables in Urban and Bedouin Geographical Regions in Kuwait. Arabian Humanities. Revue Internationale d’Archéologie et de Sciences Sociales sur la Péninsule Arabique/International Journal of Archaeology and Social Sciences in the Arabian Peninsula, 10. https://doi.org/10.4000/cy.3731
Antfolk, J., Lieberman, D., Albrecht, A., & Santtila, P. (2014). The Self-Regulation Effect of Fertility Status on Inbreeding Aversion: When Fertile, Disgust Increases More in Response to Descriptions of One’s Own than of Others’ Inbreeding. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200308
Assaf, S., & Khawaja, M. (2009). Consanguinity Trends and Correlates in the Palestinian Territories. Journal of Biosocial Science, 41, 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932008002940
Bhinder, M. A., Sadia, H., Mahmood, N., Qasim, M., Hussain, Z., Rashid, M. M. et al. (2019). Consanguinity: A Blessing or Menace at Population Level? Annals of Human Genetics, 83, 214-219.
Bittles, A. H. (2012). Consanguinity in Context (Vol. 63). Cambridge University Press.
Bittles, A. H., & Black, M. L. (2010). Consanguinity, Human Evolution, and Complex Diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 1779-1786. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906079106
Buunk, A. P. (2017). All in the Family: Attitudes towards Cousin Marriages among Young Dutch People from Various Ethnic Groups. Evolution, Mind and Behaviour, 15, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1556/2050.2017.0001
Denic, S., Agarwal, M. M., & Nagelkerke, N. (2012). Growth of Consanguineous Populations: Effect of Family and Group Size. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease, 2, S227-S232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(12)60157-1
Fuster, V., & Colantonio, S. E. (2004). Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Geographic Variables Affecting the Diverse Degrees of Consanguineous Marriages in Spain. Human Biology, 76, 1-14.
Gunaid, A. A., Hummad, N. A., & Tamim, K. A. (2004). Consanguineous Marriage in the Capital City Sana’a, Yemen. Journal of Biosocial Science, 36, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932003006138
Hamamy, H. (2012). Consanguineous Marriages. Journal of Community Genetics, 3, 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-011-0072-y
Hamamy, H., & Alwan, S. (2016). The Sociodemographic and Economic Correlates of Consanguineous Marriages in Highly Consanguineous Populations. In D. Kumar, & R. Chadwick (Eds.), Genomics and Society (pp. 335-361). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420195-8.00018-5
Hamamy, H., Antonarakis, S. E., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Temtamy, S., Romeo, G., Ten Kate, L. P. et al. (2011). Consanguineous Marriages, Pearls and Perils: Geneva International Consanguinity Workshop Report. Genetics in Medicine, 13, 841-847. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e318217477f
Hami, H., Soulaymani, A., & Mokhtari, A. (2009). Les Détermionants des Mariages Consanguins dans la Région de Rabat-Salé-Zemmour-Zaer (Maroc). Antropo, 18, 27-35.
Heidari, F., Dastgiri, S., Akbari, R., Khamnian, Z., Khanlarzadeh, E., Baradaran, M. et al. (2014). Prevalence and Risk Factors of Consanguineous Marriage. European Journal of General Medicine, 11, 248-255. https://doi.org/10.15197/sabad.1.11.81
Iqbal, S., Zakar, R., Fischer, F., & Zakar, M. Z. (2022). Consanguineous Marriages and Their Association with Women’s Reproductive Health and Fertility Behavior in Pakistan: Secondary Data Analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2018. BMC Women’s Health, 22, Article No. 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01704-2
Islam, M. M. (2012). The Practice of Consanguineous Marriage in Oman: Prevalence, Trends and Determinants. Journal of Biosocial Science, 44, 571-594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932012000016
Islam, M. M. (2018). The Changing Pattern and Determinants of Declining Consanguinity in Jordan during 1990-2012. Annals of Human Biology, 45, 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2018.1429655
Islam, M. M. (2021). Consanguineous Marriage and Its Relevance to Divorce, Polygyny and Survival of Marriage: Evidence from a Population-Based Analysis in Jordan. Annals of Human Biology, 48, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2021.1877354
Kanaan, Z. M., Mahfouz, R., & Tamim, H. (2008). The Prevalence of Consanguineous Marriages in an Underserved Area in Lebanon and Its Association with Congenital Anomalies. Genetic Testing, 12, 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1089/gte.2007.0093
Kaplan, S., Pinar, G., Kaplan, B., Aslantekin, F., Karabulut, E., Ayar, B., & Dilmen, U. (2016). The Prevalence of Consanguineous Marriages and Affecting Factors in Turkey: A National Survey. Journal of Biosocial Science, 48, 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932016000055
Kelmemi, W., Chelly, I., Kharrat, M., & Chaabouni-Bouhamed, H. (2015). Consanguinity and Homozygosity among Tunisian Patients with an Autosomal Recessive Disorder. Journal of Biosocial Science, 47, 718-726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002193201400056X
Kerkeni, E., Monastiri, K., Saket, B., Rudan, D., Zgaga, L., & Ben Cheikh, H. (2006). Association among Education Level, Occupation Status, and Consanguinity in Tunisia and Croatia. Croatian Medical Journal, 47, 656-661.
Khan, F. Z. A., & Mazhar, S. B. (2018). Current Trends of Consanguineous Marriages and Its Association with Socio-Demographic Variables in Pakistan. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7, 1699-1705. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181898
Mahboub, S. M., Alsaqabi, A. A., Allwimi, N. A., Aleissa, D. N., & Al-Mubarak, B. A. (2020). Prevalence and Pattern of Consanguineous Marriage among Educated Married Individuals in Riyadh. Journal of Biosocial Science, 52, 768-775. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932019000786
Na’amnih, W., Romano-Zelekha, O., Kabaha, A., Rubin, L. P., Bilenko, N., Jaber, L., Honovich, M., & Shohat, T. (2014). Prevalence of Consanguineous Marriages and Associated Factors among Israeli Bedouins. Journal of Community Genetics, 5, 395-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-014-0188-y
Na’amnih, W., Romano-Zelekha, O., Kabaha, A., Rubin, L. P., Bilenko, N., Jaber, L., Honovich, M., & Shohat, T. (2015). Continuous Decrease of Consanguineous Marriages among Arabs in Israel. American Journal of Human Biology, 27, 94-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22610
Nawaz, A., Zaman, M., & Malik, S. (2021). Consanguinity, Inbreeding Coefficient, Fertility and Birth-Outcome in Population of Okara District, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 37, 770-775. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.2263
Oniya, O., Neves, K., Ahmed, B., & Konje, J. C. (2019). A Review of the Reproductive Consequences of Consanguinity. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 232, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.042
Sahin, E., İnciser Paşalak, Ş., & Seven, M. (2020). Consanguineous Marriage and Its Effect on Reproductive Behavior and Uptake of Prenatal Screening. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 29, 849-856. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1214
Schellekens, J., Kenan, G., & Hleihel, A. (2017). The Decline in Consanguineous Marriage among Muslims in Israel: The Role of Education. Demographic Research, 37, 1933-1948. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.61
Sharkia, R., Azem, A., Kaiyal, Q., Zelnik, N., & Mahajnah, M. (2010). Mental Retardation and Consanguinity in a Selected Region of the Israeli Arab community. Central European Journal of Medicine, 5, 91-96.
Sharkia, R., Khatib, M., Sheikh-Muhammad, A., Mahajnah, M., & Zalan, A. (2021). The Prevailing Trend of Consanguinity in the Arab Society of Israel: Is It Still a Challenge? Journal of Biosocial Science, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932021000675
Sharma, S. K., Kalam, M. A., Ghosh, S., & Roy, S. (2021). Prevalence and Determinants of Consanguineous Marriage and Its Types in India: Evidence from the National Family Health Survey, 2015-2016. Journal of Biosocial Science, 53, 566-576. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932020000383
Shenk, M. K., Towner, M. C., Voss, E. A., & Alam, N. (2016). Consanguineous Marriage, Kinship Ecology, and Market Transition. Current Anthropology, 57, S167-S180. https://doi.org/10.1086/685712
Subalakshmi, T., & Mohan, J. C. (2021). Influence of Maternal Age and Consanguinity on Pregnancy Outcome in Sivagangai, Tamil Nadu, South India. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology, 42, 28-33.
Suliman, B. A. (2021). The Impact of Consanguinity on Women’s Attitudes toward Molecular Testing of Breast Cancer in Saudi Arabia. Breast Cancer Management, 10, BMT57. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmt-2021-0002
Tadmouri, G. O., Nair, P., Obeid, T., Al Ali, M. T., Al Khaja, N., & Hamamy, H. A. (2009). Consanguinity and Reproductive Health among Arabs. Reproductive Health, 6, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-6-17
Van Buren, F., & Van Gordon, W. (2020). Emirati Women’s Experiences of Consanguineous Marriage: A Qualitative Exploration of Attitudes, Health Challenges, and Coping Styles. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18, 1113-1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00123-z
Yahyaa, B. T., Al-Samarrai, M. A. M., & Jadoo, S. A. A. (2019). Prevalence and Perception of Women about Consanguineous Marriage in Al-Ramadi City. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 10, 567-573. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.00758.7
Zalan, A., Khatib, M., Sheik Muhammad, A., Mahajnah, M., & Sharkia, R. (2021). Consanguinity Status in the Arab Society of Israel: Is It Different? American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research, 15, 66-76.