Dialectics of Sacrificing and Worshiping Animals in Hindu Festivals of Nepal
- 1 Department of Anthropology, Patan Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Patan Dhoka, Nepal
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the basic trend of dialectic in animal worshipping and sacrificing in Nepali cultural festivals; mainly worshipping and sacrificing dialectics, material and spiritual dialectics: from early date to the present day. This can never be denied that it is dialectics or contradictory approach which might be thought to be the basic tenet of its socio-scientific ameliorations. Dialectics, here, is used as to be synonymous with contradictions or debate, mainly in the behavioral pattern of people in specific culture. Dialectics is used as the gap between idea cultural beliefs and behavior of people in Hindu cultural context. From Hegalian dialectic perspective to Marxist dialectic perspective and even if Harris dialectic model of cultural materialism, it is found that Dashain and Tihar , what we are celebrating nowadays, are dialectic materialistic in nature. It has great significance ecological, economic and adaptive socio-culturally, bio-psychological, but still it is perceived as religiously. Religion provides societal glue, because it offers people meaning and purpose for their lives and it gives certain values and meanings. That’s why people believe in religion either for “hope” or by “fear”. In fact, religious rituals are practices required or expected of members of a faith. Rituals usually honor the divine power (or powers) worshipped by believers; the) also remind adherents of their religious duties and responsibilities. Both worshipping and sacrificing animals or cattle in cultural context are determined by their dialectism in it.
- Agoramoorthy, G. (2009). Sustainable Development: The Power of Water to Ease Poverty and Enhance Ecology. Delhi: Daya Publishing House.
- Agoramoorthy, G., & Hsu, M. J. (2006). Do Animals Suffer Caste Prejudice in Hinduism? Social Compass, 53, 244-245.
- Barfield, T. (1997). The Dictionary of Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Bista, D. B. (1987). People of Nepal. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.
- Bohannan, P., & Glazer, M. (1988). High Points in Anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
- Craib, I. (1997). Classical Social Theory. London: Oxford University Press.
- Cuff, E. C., Francis, D. W., & Sharrock, W. W. (1990). Perspectives in Sociology. London: Unwin Hyman.
- Gupta, S. (2006). Festivals of India. Delhi: Har Anand Publication.
- Harris, M. (1966). The Cultural Ecology of India’s Sacred Cattle. Current Anthropology, 7, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1086/200662
- Harris, M. (1979). Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. New York: Random House.
- Harris, M. (1998). Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
- Hawley, H. A. (1950). Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
- Kathamndu Post (2019). Government Faces a Goat Problem Ahead of Dashain, Import Restrictions and Insufficient Domestic Production Mean Prices Are Likely to Soar. Kathmandu: Kathmandu Post.
- Kottak, C. P. (1999). The New Ecological Anthropology. American Anthropologist, 101, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.1.23
- Leach, E. R. (1968). Dialectic in Practical Redigion. In E. R. Leach (Ed.), Social Anthropology (Vol. 5, P. 207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Magnarella, P. J. (1982). Cultural Materialism and the Problem of Probabilities. American Anthropology, 84, 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.1.02a00120
- Majupuria, T. C. (2000). Sacred Animals of Nepal & India. Delhi: Adriot Publishers.
- Milton, K. (1997). Ecologies: Anthropology, Culture and the Environment. International Social Sciences Journal, 49, 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00039.x