Cybermigration: Connections, Human Mobility and Media Culture. An Italian Case Study
- 1 University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy
Abstract
The migration process, dependent on international interconnections and the symbolic contents of the media, now sees a new protagonist, a new social subject-nomadic, cosmopolitan, capable of redefining himself, crossing geographical and cultural barriers, sustained by the power of electronic (and digital) media, able to imagine the future and himself within new environments (online and offline), exploiting opportunities and running significant risks (fake news or digital trafficking of migrants, surveillance, for example). This individual is the cybermigrant. Cybermigration is a new form of human mobility in the digital environment and focuses in particular on two aspects: social-digital capital and online security ( Buoncompagni, 2020 ) . This research starts from Bordieu ’ s line of thought and highlights several theories of particular importance, focusing in particular on a new form of “ social-digital capital ” ( Boyd & Ellison, 2007 ; De Feo & Pitzalis, 2015 ) tha t can be applied to migration and the various forms of communication involved. Furthermore, the social use of media by migrants before and after their journey to Italy is investigated. The methodology mainly used is that of the focus group.
- Achotegui, J. (2005). Estrés limite y salud mental: El sindrome del immigrante con estrés cronico y multiple (Sìindrome dei Ulises). Reviste Norte de salud mental de la Sociedad Espanola de Neuropsiquiatria, 21.
- Appadurai, A. (2001). Modernità in polvere. Roma: Meltemi.
- Appadurai, A. (2005). Sicuri da morire. Roma: Meltemi.
- Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
- Buoncompagni, G. (2020). Cybermigration. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (1-3). New Jersey: John Wiley&Sons.
- Buoncompagni, G., & D’Ambrosi, L. (2020). Hate Speech towards Migrants. In G. La Rocca, & J. M. Torvisco (Eds,), Technological and Digital Risk: Research Issues (pp. pp. 177-190). Bern: Peter Lang Publishing.
- Cheesman, M. (2016). Mapping Refugee Media Journeys: Smartphone and Social Media Networks. French: The Open University Press.
- Connor, P. (2017). The Digital Footprint of Europe’s Refugee. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2017/06/08/digital-footprint-of-europes-refugees/
- Cusimano, G., & Mercatanti, L. (2017). Conflitto e scelta della destinazione migratoria. In A. Pagano (Ed.), Migrazioni e identità: Analisi Multidisciplinari. Roma: Edicusano.
- De Feo, A., & Pitzalis, M. (2015). A cura di, Produzione, riproduzione e distinzione. Studiare il mondo sociale con (e dopo) Bordieu. Cagliari: Cuec.
- Dekker, R., & Engbersen, G. (2012). How Social Media Transform Migrant Networks and Facilitate Migration. Oxford: International Migration Institute.
- IOM (2018). World Migration Report. Geneva: IOM.
- IOM (2020). Migrants and the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Initial Analysis. Geneva: IOM.
- Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization. New York: Random House.
- Lind, D. (2018). What Chain Migration Really Means—And Why Donald Trump Hates It So Much. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/12/29/16504272/chain-migration-family-how-trump-end
- Moores, S. (2012). Media, Place and Mobility. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Okong’o, G. (2017). Kenya: The Potential and Limitations of Electoral Technology. https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/kenya-potential-and-limitations-electoral-technology