Faith and Property Rights: Discussion on the Legality of Virtual Identity and Property Rights Distribution
- 1 Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Hengshui College, Hengshui, China
Abstract
This article combs through many documents on property rights analysis in recent years, discusses existing property rights analysis from three dimensions: the shaping mechanism of property rights, the existence form of property rights, and the social nature of property rights, revealing the endogenous and outreach of the rules of property rights Evolution mechanism. And from the perspective of typology, it interprets the intersubjectivity of the construction of property rights and the legal role of virtual identity in the distribution of property rights, and points out that property rights are not only a lubricant for social stability, but also an accelerator for national economic development. The article points out that this duality of property rights is manifested in the collusion of power and authority in terms of legitimacy, and abstracted into the interweaving of ideology and social belief in terms of rationality. It plays an important role in the distribution and protection of rights. Although existing research usually regards property rights as the basic concept of economics, they cannot ignore the social, political, and legal process of property rights. Therefore, the discussion of the legality of virtual identity in the distribution of property rights is the main reason to understand the process of property rights realization and also an important concept for analyzing the relationship between social beliefs and property rights.
- Adkisson, R. V. (2004). Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Journal of Economic Issues, 38, 281-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2004.11506680
- Ajayi, M. A., & Olotuah, A. O. (2005). Violation of Women’s Property Rights within the Family. Agenda, 19, 58-63.
- Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777-795.
- Alston, L., Mueller, B., & Cosgel, M.M. (2003). Property Rights to Land. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History, 4, 274-279.
- Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2008). How Well Do Institutional Theories Explain Firms’ Perceptions of Property Rights? The Review of Financial Studies, 21, 1833-1871. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhl032
- Breakey, H. (2010). Natural Intellectual Property Rights and the Public Domain. The Modern Law Review, 73, 208-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00791.x
- Bubb, R. (2013). The Evolution of Property Rights: State Law or Informal Norms? The Journal of Law & Economics, 56, 555-594. https://doi.org/10.1086/673208
- Carruthers, B. G., & Ariovich, L. (2004). The Sociology of Property Rights. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110538
- Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. In C. Gopalakrishnan (Ed.), Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics (pp. 87-137). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523210_6
- Cole, D. H., & Grossman, P. Z. (2002). The Meaning of Property Rights: Law versus Economics? Land Economics, 78, 317-330. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146892
- Demsetz, H. (1967). Towards a Theory of Property Rights. The American Economic Review, 57, 347-359.
- Elegido, J. M. (1995). Intrinsic Limitations of Property Rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 411-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872103
- Frech III, H. E. (1975). Property Rights and the Dynamic Inefficiency of Capitalism Comment. Journal of Political Economy, 83, 209-213.
- Frey, B. S., & Buhofer, H. (1988) Prisoners and Property Rights. The Journal of Law & Economics, 31, 19-46. https://doi.org/10.1086/467148
- Fustel de Coulanges (2006). La cités antique: étude sur le culte, le droit, les institutions de la Grème et de Rome. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.