Nash Social Welfare, Logic, and Inductive Game Theory: An Application on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine
- 1 University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan, and Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
In this lecture, I introduce the theory of Nash social welfare (NSW) function, and discuss its implications for peace and justice, particularly, in the context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. We face many other devastating events in the present world. Because the NSW theory aims to consider such events, the theory consists of extreme postulates from the viewpoint of extant socia l thoughts. As expected, it involves various conundrums at the foundational levels in the socio-economic and philosophical senses, in particular , the problems of small communities versus those at the level of the whole world. To understand such contrast, here, we discuss the subjects listed in the title of the lecture, that is, the NSW theory, logic and inductive game theory. These help us consider managements of the world, as well as their applications to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The main text describes how these seemingly independent subjects are connected in my research development and have important implications for devastating events.
- Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Value. Yale University Press.
- Einstein, A. (1968). Ideas and Opinions. Bonanza Books.
- Hammond, P. J., Kaneko, M., & Wooders, M. H. (1989). Continuum Economies with Finite Coalitions: Core, Equilibria and Widespread Externalities. Journal of Economic Theory, 49, 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(89)90070-7
- Harsanyi, J. C. (1953). Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk Taking. Journal of Political Economy, 61, 434-435. https://doi.org/10.1086/257416
- Harsanyi, J. C. (1955). Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. Journal of Political Economy, 63, 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1086/257678
- Hobbes, T. (1991). Leviathan. Cambridge University Press. (The Original 1651)
- Hu, T.-W., Kaneko, M., & Suzuki, N.-Y. (2019). Small Infinitary Epistemic Logics. Review of Symbolic Logic, 12, 702-735. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020319000029
- Kaneko, M. (1980). An Extension of the Nash Bargaining Problem and the Nash Social Welfare Function. Theory and Decision, 12, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154358
- Kaneko, M. (2018). Exploring New Socio-Economic Thought for a Small and Narrow Earth. Advances in Applied Sociology, 8, 397-421. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2018.85024
- Kaneko, M. (2021). Exploring New Socioeconomic Thoughts for a Small and Narrow World: Unity and Decentralization. In R. Singh (Ed.), New Horizons in Education and Social Studies (Vol. 11, pp. 1-21. Book Publisher International. (Revised version of Kaneko, 2018) https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nhess/v11/8090D
- Kaneko, M. (2023). Nash Social Welfare, Logic, and Inductive Game Theory: An Application on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Warsaw School of Economics. https://www.sgh.waw.pl/en/doctors-honoris-causa
- Kaneko, M., & Kline, J. J. (2008). Inductive Game Theory: A Basic Scenario. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44, 1332-1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2008.07.009
- Kaneko, M., & Matsui, A. (1999). Inductive Game Theory: Discrimination and Prejudices. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 1, 101-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/1097-3923.00005
- Kaneko, M., & Nagashima, T. (1996). Game Logic and Its Applications I. Studia Logica, 57, 325-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370838