Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Conflict and Integration: Humanistic and Sociological Analysis of the Paris Olympic Games
Sports Teaching and Research Section, Anhui Chuzhou Technician College, Chuzhou, China
- 1 Sports Teaching and Research Section, Anhui Chuzhou Technician College, Chuzhou, China
Advances in Applied Sociology·Volume 16 (2026)·Pages 74–85·Published 5 February 2026·DOI10.4236/aasoci.2026.162006
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
From a sociological point of view, the Paris Olympics is not only a stage for sports competition, but also carries profound social conflicts and cultural integration. Whether it is the conflict between religious culture and multiculturalism in the context of globalization, social class differences, or the identity of gender-diverse athletes, the influence of political conflicts on athletes, and the influence of “fan culture” all reflect the complexity of today’s world society. By understanding these conflicts and integrations, we can better understand the sociological significance of the Olympic Games and explore how to achieve multi-cultural harmony between humanity and nature in the era of globalization.
KeywordsParis OlympicsReligious CulturePolitical ConflictGender-DiverseStimulantsFan Culture
- Che, X. S., Tu, T., & Zhou, Q. T. (2023). In The 13th National Sports Science Conference- Special Report (Sports Social Sciences Branch) (p. 699).
- Fan, F., & Li, M. X. (2022). Research on the Influence of “Fan Circle” Culture on Sports Fan Culture. In Summary of the 12th National Sports Science Conference-Special Report (Sports Social Sciences Branch) (p. 45).
- Gan, L. H. (2024). Freedom and Transcendence: The Existential Aesthetics of the Opening Ceremony of the Paris Olympics—What Kind of Olympics Do We Need in the Post-Pandemic Era? Cultural and Artistic Research, 4 , 5-6.
- Knox, T., Anderson, L. C., & Heather, A. (2019). Transwomen in Elite Sport: Scientific and Ethical Considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45, 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105208
- Li, G., Zhang, X. J., & Gao, R. (2019). A Multidimensional Review of the Olympic Values Education Program. Journal of Physical Education, 26 , 31-32.
- Li, Z., & Liu, Y. P. (2020). The Improvement of the World Anti-Doping Governance Framework from the Sun Yang Case. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 43 , 66.
- Liu, X. Q. (2018). Human Rights Studies, 20 , 299.
- Mei, A., & Huang, S. Y. (2023a). Conflict and Balance: Derogation and Protection of Athlete Data Rights under Anti-Doping Governance. Journal of Shandong Sports University, 39 , 82.
- Mei, A., & Huang, S. Y. (2023b). Protection of Athlete Data Rights under the Anti-Doping Governance System. Sports Science, 43 , 95.
- Mei, A., & Zheng, Y. H. (2021). The World Anti-Doping System: Athlete Rights Reduction under Procedural Misconduct. Journal of Wuhan Sports University, 55 , 50.
- Nguyen, Q. H., & Valčo, M. (2020). Religion, Culture and Vietnam Seen from a Cultural-Religious Point of View. European Journal of Science and Theology , 16, 137-149.
- Petrėnaitė, D. (2021). Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 702-712.
- Pigozzi, F., Bigard, X., Steinacker, J., Wolfarth, B., Badtieva, V., Schneider, C. et al. (2022). Joint Position Statement of the International Federation of Sports Medicine (FIMS) and European Federation of Sports Medicine Associations (EFSMA) on the IOC Framework on Fairness, Inclusion and Non-Discrimination Based on Gender Identity and Sex Variations. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 8, e001273. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001273