The Prediction of Social Problem-Solving Skills Based on Birth Order and Attachment Styles
- 1 Assistant Professor of Educational Psychology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- 2 MA in General Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- 3 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Science, Science and Research Branch University, Islamic Azad University (IAU), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to predict social problem-solving skills in two dimensions (functional and dysfunctional), based on birth order and attachment styles in university students. For the study, 234 students were randomly selected at Azad University in the Science & Research Branch, who completed two questionnaires: Hazen & Shaver’s Attachment Styles Inventory (AAI) and D’Zurilla et al.’s Social Problem Solving Skills Inventory-Revised (SPSI_R). Data were analyzed with multiple regression and MANOVA tests. The results revealed that avoidant and anxious attachment styles had significant and positive relationship with dysfunctional social problem solving, and had significant and negative relationship with functional social problem solving skills; and birth order significantly predicted dysfunctional social problem solving. Also, a comparison of the first and last children showed that a significant difference existed between the mean of first and last children in avoidant attachment style (first children were higher than that of last children). But there is no significant difference between first and last children in the dimensions of social problem-solving skills.
- Abolmaali, Kh. (2010). Theories of criminology and delinquency. Tehran: Arjmand.
- Ainsworth, M. S., Blehar, M. C., Water, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: Psychological study of the strange situation. Tilsdate, NJ: Elbaum.
- Allen, J. P. (2002). Attachment and autonomy as predictors of the development of social skills and deviance during mid-adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 56-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.56
- Besharat, M. A., & Shalchi, B. (2007). The relationship between attachment styles and coping stress mechanism. Journal of Iranians’ Psychologists, 11, 225-235.
- Chang, C., D’Zurilla, T. J., & Sanna, L. (2004). Social problem solving: Theory, Research, and Training. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10805-000
- Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
- Ditommaso, E., Brannen-McNulty, C., Ross, L., & Burgess, M. (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 303-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00190-3
- D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, T. (2002). Social Problem-Solving Inventory Revised (SPSI-R): Manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
- Fullam, A. (2002). Adult attachment, emotional intelligence, health, and immunological responsiveness to stress. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences an Engineering, 63, 1079.
- Gillath, O., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. (2001). Subliminal 7 threatprimes increase the accessibility of attachment figures 7 names. Poster Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Ghorbani, N. (2002). Short-term Dynamic Psychotherapy. Tehran: Samt.
- Karimi, J. (2003). Personality psychology (9th edition). Tehran: Payam Noor University Press.
- Harris, J. R. (2006). No two alike. Journal of Human Nature and Human Individuality, 30, 107-112.
- Hazen, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualizes easy attachment process. Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 511-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131448