This study introduces a framework to model moderate-to-high poverty transition in urban neighborhoods using their relative competitive positions within metropolitan areas. Relative competitive position is measured by a variety of neighborhood attributes, including resident and neighborhood characteristics, locational attributes, among others. The model was estimated using the decennial census, using tracts from 1990 and 2000 as proxies for neighborhoods. Results indicate that the competitive model works well as a method to evaluate neighborhood poverty transition. Neighborhoods with relatively unfavorable competitive positions within a metropolitan area experience more poverty growth and therefore are likely to have more concentrated poverty in the future. Based on the results, several recommendations are made to intervene. These include promoting public transit, immigrant assimilation programs, among others.
Brueckner, J. (1977). The determinants of residential succession. Journal of Urban Economics, 4, 45-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(77)90029-8
Carter, W. H., Schill, M. H., & Wachter, S. M. (1998). Polarisation, public housing and racial minorities in US cities. Urban Studies, 35, 1889-1911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0042098984204
Cohen, C. J., & Dawson, M. C. (1993). Neighborhood poverty and African American politics. American Political Science Review, 87, 286-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2939041
DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. L. (1999). Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens? Journal of Urban Economics, 45, 354-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/juec.1998.2098
Downs, A. (1994). New vision for metropolis America: Why we need a new vision. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Eggers, M. L., & Massey, D. S. (1992). A longitudinal analysis of urban poverty: Blacks in U.S. metropolitan areas between 1970 and 1980. Social Science Research, 21, 175-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(92)90014-8
Ellen, I. G. (2000). Sharing America’s neighborhoods: The prospects for stable, racial integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ellen, I. G., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Reversal of fortunes? Lowerincome urban neighborhoods in the US in the 1990s. Urban Studies, 45, 845-869.
Fogarty, M. S. (1977). Predicting neighborhood decline within a large central city: An application of discriminant analysis. Environment and Planning A, 9, 579-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a090579
Galster, G. C. (2001). On the nature of neighborhood. Urban Studies, 38, 2111-2124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087072
Galster, G. C., Quercia, R. G., Cortes, A., & Malega, R. (2003). The Fortunes of poor neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 39, 205-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1078087403254493
Hughes, M. (1989). Mispeaking truth to power: A geographical perspective on the “underclass” fallacy. Economic Geography, 65, 187207. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/143834
Jargowsky, P. (1997). Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Jargowsky, P., & Bane, M. J. (1990). GHETTO poverty: Basic questions. In Inner-city poverty in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Jargowsky, P. (2003). Stunning progress, hidden problems: The dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kasarda, J. (1993). Inner-city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate, 4, 253-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1993.9521135
Kingsley, G. T., & Pettit, K. (2003). Concentrated poverty: A change in course. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Leven, C., Little, J., Nourse, H., & Read, R. (1976). Neighborhood change: Lessons in the dynamics of urban decay. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Massey, D., Eggers, M., & Denton, N. (1990). Disentangling the causes of concentrated poverty. Unpublished Paper, Chicago, IL: Population Research Center, NORC/University of Chicago.
Massey, D. S., & Eggers, M. L. (1990). The ecology of inequality: Minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970-1980. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1153-1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/229425
Metzger, J. (2000). Planned abandonment: The neighborhood life-cycle theory and national urban policy. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 7-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2000.9521359
Mincy, R. B., Sawhill, I., & Wolf, D. (1990). The underclass: Definition and measurement. Science, 248, 450-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.248.4954.450
Rosenthal, S. (2007). Old homes, externalities, and poor neighborhoods: A model of urban decline and renewal. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 816-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.06.003
Orfield, M., & Katz, B. (2002). American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Oreopoulos, P. (2003). The long-run consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 15331575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552865
Quercia, R. G., & Galster, G. C. (2000). Thresh-old effects and neighborhood change, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20, 146-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0002000202
Schuler, J., Kent, R., & Monroe, B. (1992). Neighborhood gentrification: A discriminant analysis of a historic district in Cleveland, Ohio. Urban Geography, 13, 49-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.13.1.49
Scott, A. (1988). Metropolis: From division of labor to urban form. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Tatian, A. P. (2003). Neighborhood change database: Data users’ guide. http://www.geolytics.com/pdf/NCDB-LF-Data-Users-Guide.pdf
Temkin, K., & Robe, W. (1996). Neighborhood change and urban policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15, 159-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9601500301
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.