Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed

In Defense of Culturally-Specific Organizations: Understanding the Rationale and the Evidence

¹ School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
² School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

Advances in Applied Sociology·Volume 06 (2016)·Pages 67–80·Published 4 February 2016·DOI10.4236/aasoci.2016.62007

Abstract

Racial disparities abound in human services, with communities of color facing grave impediments to positive progress. Mainstream institutions move painstakingly slowly on reforms—movement too slow to offer this generation prospects for real hope in equity. This paper builds the rationale for expanding funding for culturally-specific organizations, detailing the ways that the literature and the tacit knowledge of culturally-specific organizations improve outcomes for clients and communities of color. The article identifies the service benefits in terms of client outcomes, accountability practices, community benefits, cultural affirmation and inclusion, building community and political capital, and lessening investments in white-centric services. We also identify methods for funding bodies to invest in culturally-specific organizations, and consider the accountability practices that might stimulate mainstream organizations to make gains in racial equity.

KeywordsCulturally-Specific OrganizationsEthnic AgenciesRacial DisparitiesRacial EquityDangerous Allies

Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
Bell, J. &Ridolfi, L. (2008). Adoration of the Question: Reflections on the Failure to Reduce Racial & Ethnic Disparities in the Juvenile Justice System. San Francisco, CA: W. Haywood Burns Institute.
Beresford, P. (2000). Service Users’ Knowledges and Social Work Theory: Conflict or Collaboration? British Journal of Social Work, 30, 489-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/30.4.489
Bishop, A. (2002). Becoming an Ally: Breaking the Cycle of Oppression. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
Boyd-Franklin, N. (1989). Black Families in Therapy: A Multisystem Approach. New York: Guilford.
Butcher, H. (2008). Service User Involvement in Cancer Care: Policy, Principles, Practice. London: National Cancer Action Team.
Chapin Hall Center for Children (2009). Understanding Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
Clewell, B. C., Puma, M. J., & McKay, S. A. (2005). Does It Matter If My Teacher Looks Like Me? The Impact of Teacher Race and Ethnicity on Student Academic Achievement. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Coalition of Communities of Color (2010). Multnomah County’s Philosophy and Implementation of Culturally Specific Services. In A. Curry-Stevens (Ed.), Cross-Hemmer & Coalition of Communities of Color’s Communities of Color in Multnomah County: An Unsettling Profile (pp. 137-139). Portland, OR: Portland State University.
Cross, T. (1991). Organizational Self-Study on Cultural Competence for Agencies Addressing Child Abuse and Neglect. Portland, OR: Northwest Indian Child Welfare Association, Inc.
Curry-Stevens, A. (2010). Journeying towards Humility: Complexities in Advancing Pedagogy for the Privileged. Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping, 16, 61-72.
Curry-Stevens, A., Cross-Hemmer, A., & Coalition of Communities of Color (2010). Communities of Color in Multnomah County: An Unsettling Profile. Portland, OR: Portland State University.

Menu

Menu

Menu

In Defense of Culturally-Specific Organizations: Understanding the Rationale and the Evidence

Abstract

References (55)