The Importance of Engineer Image in Society: Understanding Engineer’s Representation in the Mind of Tunisian Entrepreneurs
- 1 University of El-Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
- 2 Research Unit, Sports Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia
- 3 Laboratory TEC, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate a new perspective that can incrementally analyze framework of entrepreneurs’ representations with regards to engineer image. It identifies managers’ attitudes towards the engineer and reveals the real factors that can explain the policy of hiring senior technicians in the Tunisian Cap-Bon industry. The sociological analysis of the representation of the industrial company leader on the issue of executive recruitment engineers had helped to highlight the risks of driving performed changes, the discrepancy between managerial objectives and how implement decisions. The ultimate consequences of this inconsistency can brake recruiting new engineers. Results highlight the influence of the entrepreneurs’ representations on the employment issue. Analysis of attitudes demonstrates that mind of leader towards framework engineer seems irrational, as long as, leader integrates technical uncertainties related to organizational and economic changes. In line with the main study, these social representations of the frame could be made on configurations, opinions, habits, equity positions, varied and often contradictory. If we are willing to embrace the idea that there would be a “change” in entrepreneurs’ representations towards engineers, it might be incrementally achieved through a triple register: cognitive, strategic and ethical.
- Barkatoolah, A. (2000). Valider les acquis et les compétences en entreprise. Paris: INEPS.
- Ben Salem, L. (1994). Les ingénieurs tunisiens aux XIXe et XXe siècles. Revue du Monde musulman et de la Méditerranée, No. 72.
- Bonardi, C., & Roussiau, N. (2001). Les représentations sociales, Etats des lieux et perspectives, Mardaga.
- Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2012). The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 36, 677-702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00432.x
- Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L’Acteur et le système, Les contraintes de l’action collective. Paris: éditions du Seuil, Collection Points/Essais.
- Doise, W. (1973). Relations et représentations entre groupes. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (Vol. 1). Paris: Larousse.
- Durand, C., Fili, J.-F., & Hénault, A. (2012). Culture d’entreprise. http://culture.entreprise.free.fr/#_Toc476995189
- Follet, M. (2002). Diriger audelà du conflit. Paris: Village Mondial.
- Godelier, E. (2006). La culture d’entreprise. Collection Repères, Paris: La Découverte.
- Jodelet, D. (1984). Représentations sociales: Phénomènes, concepts et théories. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie sociale (pp. 357-378). Paris: PUF.
- Jodelet, D. (1985). Civils et bredins rapport à la folie et représentation sociale de la maladie mentale. Thèse pour le doctorat d’état, Paris: EHESS.
- Jodelet, D. (1989). Les représentations sociales. Paris: PUF.
- Kelly, H.-H., & Michela, J.-L. (1980). Attribution Theory and Research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325
- Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Le Louarn, J.-Y. (1990). Les emplois atypiques et l’efficacité de la gestion des ressources humaines, dans, Le défi de la gestion des emplois, sous la direction de Jean Boivin et autres. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
- Lotz, H. M., & Van Der Merwe, S. P. (2013). An Investigation of the Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Perceived Success of Agribusinesses in South Africa. Journal of Business Management, 44, 15-32. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v44i1.145