Body Interaction and Semiotic Approach in Volleyball School Education: Case of Tunisia
- 1 Clinical Psychology: Intersubjectivity and Culture Laboratory, Tunis, Tunisia
- 2 University of Jendouba, Jendouba, Tunisia
- 3 TEC Laboratory, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- 4 LACES EA 7437 Laboratory, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- 5 UMR-EFFETS Laboratory, University of Toulouse-Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France
Abstract
The aim of this study deals with praxis communication mechanisms that are at the heart of motor playfulness interactions formed in the practice of volleyball. This research perspective offers the opportunity to better grasp and understand the motor behavior of players that are shaping a social motor skills network revolving around cooperative and adversarial. From there, it seemed interesting to study the content of practicing volleyball at both high-level and at school. The joint communication network of sport is built on the frame of observable motor behavior of practitioners. Results revealed that within high-level sports, motor interactions of players are based on praxis communication networks being richer within school and club volleyball, thus highlighting links of opposition and cooperation around diverse and under-privileged social motor skills roles. In this context, we are questioning whether the technocratic and traditional approach of Volleyball is preferred over the approach of motor semiotic based on the study of motor behavior of practitioners and the praxis communication.
- Amade-Ecsot, C., & Brière-Guenoun, F. (2014). Questionner le curriculum en éducation physique et sportive: Quelledynamique en contexte? Quelle autonomie? Questions vives. http://questionsvives.revues.org/1683
- Birdwhistell, R.-L. (1970). Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion and Communication. Philadelphie, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201284
- Bordes, P., Collard, L., & Dugas, É. (2007). Vers une science des activités physiques et sportives. La science de l’action motrice. Paris: Vuibert.
- Boudon, R. (1979). La logique du social: Introduction à l’analyse sociologique. Paris: Hachette.
- Collard, L. (2002). Aplicaciones de la nocion de conducta motriz en el entrenamiento deportivo (Application de la notion de conduite motrice en entrainement sportif). In Proceedings of 7th International Seminar on Motor Praxeology (pp. 136-151). Lleida, INEFC.
- Delaunay, M. (1985). Des transactions sociomotrices à la pédagogie sémio-opératoire. In M. Laurent, & P. Therme (Eds.), Recherches en activités sportives 1 (pp. 45-59). Marseille: Centre de recherche de l’U.E.R.E.P.S Aix-Marseille II.
- Dugas, É. (2004). Des pratiques sociales aux pratiques scolaires en EPS: Des logiques de scolarisation plurielles. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 149, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.2004.3168
- Dugas, É. (2005). Jeux collectifs, les enseignants privilégient le sport. Revue éducation physique et sport, 312, 42.
- Dugas, É. (2011). L’homme systémique. Pour comprendre les pratiquants des jeux sportifs. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
- Dugas, É., & Bordes, P. (2008). Le volleyball seraitil le Pluton de notre système scolaire? Revue éducation physique et sport, 330, 62-66.
- Dugas, É., & Collard, L. (2009). Les sportifs et les interactions stratégiques sous l’angle de la théorie des jeux expérimentale. Presses universitaires de Liège, Les cahiers internationaux de Psychologie sociale, 81, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.3917/cips.081.0007
- During, B. (2005). L’éducation physique, une discipline en progrès? Carrefours de l’éducation, 20, 61-87. https://doi.org/10.3917/cdle.020.0061
- Hall, E.-T. (1971). La dimension cachée. Paris: Seuil.