The Importance of Models in Sociology: The Example of Max Weber
- 1 Department of Law and Social Sciences, Università Degli Studi G. D’Annunzio—Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
Abstract
Sociological research method may be resumed by three concepts of Karl R. Popper, “problems-theories-critics”. Within this field, the role of theoretical models is central. In particular, the concept of model is comparable to the one of ideal type conceived by Max Weber. As a matter of fact, Weberian ideal type is still one of the most popular methodological instruments in social sciences. Conceived as a non-normative form of conceptualization finalized to simplify and reduce external social world complexity, ideal type allows the organization of an increasing knowledge acquaintance. It is shown that as a significant character of understanding sociology, ideal type is founded on an individualistic and nomological epistemological substrate. Conceived in these terms, it is argued that ideal type is therefore the expression of a unique method of explanation which can be traced in some examples showing how models construction is one of sociology’s most used instruments.
- Aronovitch, H. (2011). Interpreting Weber’s Ideal-Types. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 42, 356-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393111408779
- Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and Taxonomies. An Introduction to Classification Techniques. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986397
- Burger, T. (1976). Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation. History, Laws and Ideal Types. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Cavalli, A. (1981). La funzione dei tipi ideali e il rapporto tra conoscenza storica e sociologia. In P. Rossi (Ed.), Max Weber e l’analisi del mondo modern (pp. 27-52). Torino: Einaudi.
- Cooley, C. H. (1910). Social Organization. A Study of the Larger Mind. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. https://doi.org/10.1037/14788-000
- Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide. A Study in Sociology. New York: The Free Press.
- Durkheim, E. (1960). The Division of Labor in Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
- Eliaeson, S. (2000). Max Weber’s Methodology: An Ideal-Type. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(200022)36:3 3.0.CO;2-C
- Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Basic Books.
- Grønning, T. (2017). Ideal Type. In B. S. Turner, C. Kyung-Sup, C. Epstein, P. Kivisto, W. Outhwaite, & J. M. Ryan (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory (pp. 1-2). London: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0670
- Hekman, S. (1983). Weber, the Ideal Type, and Contemporary Social Theory. Notre Dame, IND: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Lindbekk, T. (1992). The Weberian Ideal-Type: Development and Continuities. Acta Sociologica, 35, 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939203500402
- Lopreato, J., & Alston, L. (1970). Ideal Types and the Idealization Strategy. American Sociological Review, 35, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093855
- Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
- Parsons, T. (1991). The Social System. London: Routledge.
- Popper, K. R. (1963). Science: Problems, Aims, Responsabilities. Proceedings of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22, 961-962.