The rumen microbiome plays an essential role in ruminant physiology, nutrition and pathology as well as host immunity. A better understanding of rumen microbial processes and identification of which populations are responsible for specific functions within the rumen microbiome will lead to better management and sustainable utilization of the available feed base while maintaining a low environmental impact. Recent advance in the culture independent method of microbiology such as metagenomics, unravels potentially the rumen microbial process. Th ere are two basic types of metagenomics studies: Sequence-based and function-based metagenomics. Sequence-based metagenomics involves sequencing and analysis of DNA from environmental samples. Its purpose is to assemble genomes, identify genes, find complete metabolic pathways, and compare organisms of different communities. Whereas functional metagenomics is the study of the collective genome of a microbial community by expressing it in a foreign host usually Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) . It is a promising approach unearthing novel enzymes even from yet to culture rumen microbiota. Further advances in the screening techniques promise vast opportunities to rumen microbiologists, and animal nutritionist. The identification of novel enzyme through functional metagenomics consists of three parts: rumen sample collection; DNA library construction and screening of individual clone. Functional metagenomics was successfully applied to identify different antibiotics, hydrolytic enzymes, antibiotic resistance genes, and many other functions; moreover, it allowed characterization of genes encoding enzymes with a particular activity, which represents completely novel sequence. There are a number of outputs from functionally screened rumen product such as carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) that can break down plant cell walls. Company involved commercialization of metagenomics research such as Syngenta, Genencor International, BRAIN etc., has produced many biological molecules of commercial interest. The aim of this paper is to elucidate functional metagenomics, from rumen environment and its potential for commercial purpose.
Agarwal, N., Kamara, D.N. and Chaudhary, L.C. (2015) Rumen Microbial Ecosystem of Domesticated Ruminants. In: Puniya, A., Singh, R. and Kamra, D., Eds., Rumen Microbiology: From Evolution to Revolution, Springer, New Delhi, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2401-3_2
Stevens, C.E. and Hume, I.D. (1998) Contributions of Microbes in Vertebrate Gastrointestinal Tract to Production and Conservation of Nutrients. Physiological Reviews, 78, 393-427. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1998.78.2.393
Hobson, P.N. and Stewart, C.S. (1997) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. 1st Edition, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7
Goel, G., Dagar, S.S., Raghav, M. and Bansal, S. (2015) Rumen: An Underutilised Niche for Industrially Important Enzymes. In: Puniya, A., Singh, R. and Kamra, D., Eds., Rumen Microbiology: From Evolution to Revolution, Springer, New Delhi, 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2401-3_17
Li, R.W. (2015) Rumen Metagenomics. In: Puniya, A., Singh, R. and Kamra, D., Eds., Rumen Microbiology: From Evolution to Revolution, Springer, New Delhi, 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2401-3_16
John Wallace, R. (2008) Gut Microbiology—Broad Genetic Diversity yet Specific Metabolic Niches. Animal, 2, 661-668. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108001687
Jami, E., White, B.A. and Mizrahi, I. (2014) Potential Role of the Bovine Rumen Microbiome in Modulating Milk Composition and Feed Efficiency. PLoS ONE, 9, e85423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085423
Morgavi, D.P., Kelly, W.J., Janssen, P.H. and Attwood, G.T. (2013) Rumen Microbial (Meta)Genomics and Its Application to Ruminant Production. Animal, 7, 184-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000419
McCann, J.C., Wickersham, T.A. and Loor, J.J. (2014) High-Throughput Methods Redefine the Rumen Microbiome and Its Relationship with Nutrition and Metabolism. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, 8, 109-125. https://doi.org/10.4137%2FBBI.S15389
Krause, D., Denman, A.E. and Mackie, R.I. (2003) Opportunities to Improve Fiber Degradation in the Rumen: Microbiology, Ecology, and Genomics. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 27, 663-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00072-X
Edwards, J.E., McEwan, N.R., Travis, A.J. and Wallace, R.J. (2004) 16S rDNA Library-Based Analysis of Ruminal Bacterial Diversity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 86, 263-281. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANTO.0000047942.69033.24
Teather, R.M. (2001) Community Genomics—The Key to the Rumen? In: Beauchemin, K.A. and Crews, D.H.J., Eds., Advances in Beef Cattle Science, Livestock Sciences Section, Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Lethbridge, 228-233.
Chistoserdova, L. (2009) Functional Metagenomics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 26, 335-352. https://doi.org/10.5661/bger-26-335
Vieites, J.M., Guazzaroni, ME., Beloqui, A., Golyshin, P.N. and Ferrer, M. (2010) Molecular Methods to Study Complex Microbial Communities. In: Streit, W. and Daniel, R., Eds., Metagenomics, Vol. 668, Humana Press, Totowa, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-823-2_1
Ferrer, M., Golyshina, O.V., Chernikova, T.N., Khachane, A.N., Reyes-Duarte, D., Santos, V.A.P.M.D., Strompl, C., Elborough, K., Jarvis, G., Neef, A., Yakimov, M.M., Timmis, K.N. and Golyshin, P.N. (2005) Novel Hydrolase Diversity Retrieved from a Metagenome Library of bovIne Rumen Microflora. Environmental Microbiology, 7, 1996-2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00920.x
Wilson, D.B. (2011) Microbial Diversity of Cellulose Hydrolysis. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 14, 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.004
Sahu, A., Nayak, N., Sahu, R. and Kumar, J. (2017) Application of Metagenomics in Livestock Improvement. International Journal of Livestock Research, 7, 30-38. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170423033727
Woese, C.R., Kandler, O. and Wheelis, M.L. (1990) Towards a Natural System of Organism: Proposal for the Domain Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87, 4576-4579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576
Mackie, R.I., McSweeney, C.S. and Aminov, R.I. (2013) Rumen. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.
Martinez-Fernandez, G., Denman, S.E. and McSweeney, C.S. (2019) Sample Processing Methods Impacts on Rumen Microbiome. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, Article No. 861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00861
Jaeyong, S., Hyuck, C., Jin, Y.J., Seul, L., Hyun, J.L., Youlchang, B., Sang, Y.J. and Minseok, K. (2018) Effects of Sampling Techniques and Sites on Rumen Microbiome and Fermentation Parameters in Hanwoo Steers. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28, 1700-1705. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1803.03002
Henderson, G., Cox, F., Kittelmann, S., Miri, V.H., Zethof, M., Noel, S.J., Waghorn, G.C. and Janssen, P.H. (2013) Effect of DNA Extraction Methods and Sampling Techniques on the Apparent Structure of Cow and Sheep Rumen Microbial Communities. PLoS ONE, 8, e74787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074787
Hélène, B., Franck, P., Van Tran Van, Nathalie, L., Renaud, N., Timothy, M. and Pascal, S. (2005) High Molecular Weight DNA Recovery from Soils Prerequisite for Biotechnological Metagenomic Library Construction. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 62, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2005.01.003
Fliegerova, K., Tapio, I., Bonin, A., Mrazek, J., Callegari, M.L., Bani, P. and Wallace, R.J. (2014) Effect of DNA Extraction and Sample Preservation Method on Rumen Bacterial Population. Anaerobe, 29, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.09.015
Vaidya, J.D., van den Bogert, B., Edwards, J.E., Boekhorst, J., van Gastelen, S., Saccenti, E., Plugge, C.M. and Smidt, H. (2018) The Effect of DNA Extraction Methods on Observed Microbial Communities from Fibrous and Liquid Rumen Fractions of Dairy Cows. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, Article No. 92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00092
Chen, Y.B., Lan, D.L., Tang, C., Yang, X.N. and Li J. (2015) Effect of DNA Extraction Method on the Apparent Structure of Yak Rumen Microbial Communities as Reveled by 16S rDNA Sequencing. Polish Journal of Microbiology, 64, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2015-004
Lam, K.N., Cheng, J., Engel, K., Neufeld, J.D. and Charles, T.C. (2015) Current and Future Resources for Functional Metagenomics. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article No. 1196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01196 https://www.frontiersin.org/
Kothari, R.K., Nathani, N.M., Mootapally, C., Rank, J.K., Gosai, H.B., Dave, B.P. and Joshi, C.G. (2018) Comprehensive Exploration of the Rumen Microbial Ecosystem with Advancements in Metagenomics. In: Nagarajan, M., Ed., Metagenomics, Academic Press, Waltham, 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102268-9.00011-2
Leigh, M.B., Taylor, L. and Neufeld, J.D. (2010) Clone Libraries of Ribosomal RNA Gene Sequences for Characterization of Bacterial and Fungal Communities. In: Timmis, K.N., Ed., Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3969-3993. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_310
Lorenz, P. and Eck, J. (2005) Metagenomics and Industrial Applications. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3, 510-516. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1161
Simon, C. and Daniel, R. (2010) Metagenomic Analyses: Past and Future Trends. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 1153-1161. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02345-10
Satish, K., Kishore, K.K., Bharat, B. and Manoj, P.B. (2015) Metagenomics: Retrospect and Prospects in High Throughput Age: A Review. Biotechnology Research International, 2015, Article ID: 121735. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/121735
Uchiyama, T. and Miyazaki K. (2009) Functional Metagenomics for Enzyme Discovery: Challenges to Efficient Screening. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 20, 616-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2009.09.010
Wexler, M. and Johnston, A.W.B. (2010) Wide Host-Range Cloning for Functional Metagenomics. In: Streit, W. and Daniel, R., Eds., Metagenomics: Methods and Protocols, Vol. 668, Humana Press, Totowa, 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-823-2_5
Gabor, E., Liebeton, K., Niehaus, F., Eck, J. and Lorenz P. (2007) Updating the Metagenomics Toolbox. Biotechnology Journal, 2, 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200600250
Tanyaradzwa, R.N. and Houjin, Z. (2018) Recent Advances in Function-Based Metagenomics Screening. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 16, 405-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2018.01.002
Parkers, R.J. and Graham, F.L. (1997) A Helper Dependent System for Adenovirus Vector Production Helps Define a Lower Limit for Efficient DNA Packaging. Journal of Virology, 71, 3293-3298. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.71.4.3293-3298.1997
Katzke, N., Knapp, A., Loeschcke, A., Drepper, T. and Jaeger, K.E. (2017) Novel Tools for the Functional Expression of Metagenomic DNA. In: Streit, W. and Daniel, R., Eds., Metagenomics, Vol. 1539, Humana Press, New York, 159-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6691-2_10
Zhou, J., Bruns M.A. and Tiedje, J.M. (1996) DNA Recovery from Soils of Diverse Composition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62, 316-322. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.62.2.316-322.1996
Albers, S.V., Jonuscheit, M. and Dinkelaker, S. (2006) Production of Recombinant and Tagged Proteins in the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.1.102-111.2006
Angelov, A., Mientus, M., Liebl, S. and Liebl, W. (2009) A Two-Host Fosmid System for Functional Screening of (Meta)Genomic Libraries from Extreme Thermophiles. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 32, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2008.01.003
Craig, J.W., Chang, F.-Y., Kim, J.H., Obiajulu, S.C. and Brady, S.F. (2010) Expanding Small-Molecule Functional Metagenomics through Parallel Screening of Broad-Host-Range Cosmid Environmental DNA Libraries in Diverse Proteobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76, 1633-1641. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02169-09
Wang, G.-Y.-S., Graziani, E., Waters, B., Pan, W., Li, X., McDermott, J., Meurer, G., Saxena, G., Andersen, R.J. and Davies, J. (2000) Novel Natural Products from Soil DNA Libraries in a Streptomycete Host. Organic Letters, 2, 2401-2404. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol005860z
Steele, H.L., Jaeger, K.E., Daniel, R. and Streit, W.R. (2009) Advances in Recovery of Novel Biocatalysts from Metagenomes. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 16, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1159/000142892
Handelsman, J. (2004) Uncultured Soil Bacteria Are a Reservoir of New Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Environmental Microbiology, 6, 981-989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00664.x
Wenzel, S.C. and Müller, R. (2005) Recent Developments towards the Heterologous Expression of Complex Bacterial Natural Product Biosynthetic Pathways. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 16, 594-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2005.10.001
Popovic, A., Tchigvintsev, A., Tran, H., Chernikova, T.N., Golyshina, O.V., Yakimov, M.M., Golyshin, P.N. and Yakunin. (2015) Metagenomics as a Tool for Enzyme Discovery: Hydrolytic Enzymes from Marine Related Metagenomes. In: Krogan, N.J. and Babu, M., Eds., Prokaryotic Systems Biology, Vol. 883, Springer, Cham, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23603-2_1
Turner, N.J. (2003) Directed Evolution of Enzymes for Applied Biocatalysis. Trends in Biotechnology, 21, 474-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.09.001
Geddie, M.L., Rowe, L.A., Alexander, O.B. and Matsumura, I. (2004) High Throughput Microplate Screens for Directed Protein Evolution. Methods in Enzymology, 388, 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(04)88012-1
Sachse, K., Hotzel, H., Slickers, P., Ellinger, T. and Ehricht, R. (2005) DNA Microarray-Based Detection and Identification of Chlamydia and Chlamydophila spp. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 19, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2004.09.005
Park, S.J., Kang, C.H., Chae, J.C. and Rhee, S.K. (2008) Metagenome Microarray for Screening of Fosmid Clones Containing Specific Genes. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 284, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01180.x
Pathak, G.P. and Gärtner, W. (2010) Detection and Isolation of Selected Genes of Interest from Metagenomic Libraries by a DNA Microarray Approach. In: Streit, W.R. and Rolf, D., Eds., Metagenomics: Methods and Protocols, Vol. 668, Humana Press, Totowa, 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-823-2_21
Cirino, P.C. and Qian, S. (2013) Chapter 2—Protein Engineering as an Enabling Tool for Synthetic Biology. In: Zhao, H., Ed., Synthetic Biology, Academic Press, Waltham, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394430-6.00002-9
Kensy, F., Engelbrecht, C. and Büchs J. (2009) Scale-up from Microtiter Plate to Laboratory Fermenter: Evaluation by Online Monitoring Techniques of Growth and Protein Expression in Escherichia coli and Hansenula polymorpha Fermentations. Microbial Cell Factories, 8, Article No. 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-8-68
Yang, G. and Withers, S.G. (2009) Ultrahigh-Throughput FACS-Based Screening for Directed Enzyme Evolution. ChemBioChem, 10, 2704-2715. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200900384
Van Rossum, T., Kengen, S.W. and van der Oost, J. (2013) Reporter Based Screening and Selection of Enzymes. The FEBS Journal, 280, 2979-2996. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12281
Kodzius, R. and Gojobori T. (2016) Single Cell Technologies in Environmental Omics. Gene, 576, 701-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.031
Robertson, D.E. and Steer, B.A. (2004) Recent Progress in Biocatalyst Discovery and Optimization. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 8, 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.02.010
Dittrich, P.S. and Manz, A. (2006) Lab-on-a-Chip: Microfluidics in Drug Discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 5, 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1985
Guansheng, Du., Qun Fang., Jaap, M.J. and den Toonder. (2016) Microfluidics for Cell-Based High Throughput Screening Platforms—A Review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 903, 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.11.023
Leemhuis, H., Kelly, R.M. and Dijkhuizen, L. (2009) Directed Evolution of Enzymes: Library Screening Strategies. IUBMB Life, 61, 222-228. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.165
Choudhury, P.K., Salem, A.Z.M., Jena, R., Kumar, S., Singh, R. and Puniya, A.K. (2015) Rumen Microbiology: An Overview. In: Puniya, A., Singh, R. and Kamra, D., Eds., Rumen Microbiology: From Evolution to Revolution, Springer, New Delhi, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2401-3_1
Kumar, S. and Pitta, D.W. (2015) Revolution in Rumen Microbiology. In: Puniya, A., Sinh, R. and Kamra, D., Eds., Rumen Microbiology: From Evolution to Revolution, Springer, New Delhi, 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2401-3_24
Kala, A., Kamra, D.N., Kumar, A., Agarwal, N., Chaudhary, L.C. and Joshi, C.G. (2017) Impact of Levels of Total Digestible Nutrients on Microbiome, Enzyme Profile and Degradation of Feeds in Buffalo Rumen. PLoS ONE, 12, e0172051. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172051
Wang, F., Li, F., Chen, G. and Liu, W. (2009) Isolation and Characterization of Novel Cellulase Genes from Uncultured Microorganisms in Different Environmental Niches. Microbiological Research, 164, 650-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2008.12.002
Lopez-Cortes, N., Reyes-Duarte, D., Beloqui, A., Polaina, J., Ghazi, I., Golyshina, O.V., Ballesteros, A., Golyshin, P.N. and Ferrer M. (2007) Catalytic Role of Conserved HQGE Motif in the CE6 Carbohydrate Esterase Family. FEBS Letters, 581, 4657-4662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.08.060
Duan, C.J., Xian, L., Zhao, G.C., Feng, Y., Pang, H., Bai, X.L., Tang, J.L., Ma, Q.S. and Feng, J.X. (2009) Isolation and Partial Characterization of Novel Genes Encoding Acidic Cellulases from Metagenomes of Buffalo Rumens. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 107, 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04202.x
Hess, M., Sczyrba, A., Egan, R., Kim, T.W., Chokhawala, H., et al. (2011) Metagenomic Discovery of Biomass Degrading Genes and Genomes from Cow Rumen. Science, 331, 463-467. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200387
Cheng, G., Hu, Y., Yin, Y., Yang, X., Xiang, C., Wang, B., et al. (2012) Functional Screening of Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Human Gut Microbiota Reveals a Novel Gene Fusion. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 336, 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02647.x
Zhao, S., Wang, J., Bu, D., Liu, K., Zhu, Y. and Dong Z. (2010) Novel Glycoside Hydrolases Identified by Screening a Chinese Holstein Dairy Cow Rumen-Derived Metagenome Library. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76, 6701-6705. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00361-10
Pope, P.B., Denman, S.E., Jones, M., Tringe, S.G., Barry, K., et al. (2010) Adaptation to Herbivory by the Tammar walla by Includes Bacterial and Glycoside Hydrolase Profiles Different from Other Herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 14793-14798. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005297107
Wichmann, F., Udikovic-Kolic, N., Andrew, S. and Handelsman, J. (2014) Diverse Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Dairy Cow Manure. mBio, 5, e01017-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01017-13
Thirabunyanon, M., Boonprasom, P. and Niamsup, P. (2009) Probiotic Potential of Lactic acid Bacteria Isolated from Fermented Dairy Milks on Anti-Proliferation of Colon Cancer Cells. Biotechnology Letters, 31, 571-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-008-9902-3
Cowan, D., Meyer, Q., Staford, W., Muyanga, S., Cameron, R. and Wittwer, P. (2005) Metagenomic Gene Discovery: Past, Present and Future. Trends in Biotechnology, 23, 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.04.001