The mobility profiles of gases used in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) have been thoroughly investigated through the coupling operations of data mining of oilfield data and experimental data analyses. Mobility as an EOR objective function has not been previously applied to characterize potential reservoirs for EOR selection and application, even though it is a robust combinatorial function that benefits from two petrophysical variables, permeability and viscosity. The data mining approach identified mobility as a reliable objective function for reservoir characterisation. The data distribution and clustering results indicate that Gas EOR reservoirs have relatively higher mean mobility than Thermal, Microbial and Chemical EOR reservoirs. The experimental approach investigated EOR gases, CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 , and Air. A modified Darcy Equation of State for gas flow through porous media was applied to evaluate which gas would competitively attain the oil displacement optimisation criterion for mobility ratio, M ≤ 1. Coupling the data mining with the experimental data results reveals that gas reservoirs can be further categorized by mobility. CH 4 (18.16 mD /cp) was observed to have the highest mobility followed by Air (14.60 mD /cp), N 2 (13.61 mD /cp), and CO 2 (12.96 mD /cp). The gas mobility order significantly corresponds with the mobility distribution of reservoirs that implemented gas EOR processes. It was concluded that CO 2 offers relatively lower mobility, therefore, it is the most competitive EOR gas to approach the mobility ratio criterion of unity or less.
Hamid, S.A.A. and Muggeridge, A. (2018) Viscous Fingering in Reservoirs with Long Aspect Ratios. Society of Petroleum Engineers Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, April 2018, Article No. SPE-190294-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/190294-MS
Hamid, S.A. and Muggeridge, A.H. (2018) Analytical Solution of Polymer Slug Injection with Viscous Fingering. Computational Geosciences, 22, 711-723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9721-0
Todd Hoffman, B. (2012) Comparison of Various Gases for Enhanced Recovery from Shale Oil Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, April 2012. Article No. SPE-154329-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/154329-MS
Alvarado, V. and Manrique, E. (2010) Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Updated Review. Energies, 3, 1529-1575. https://doi.org/10.3390/en3091529
Gbadamosi, A.O., Kiwalabye, J., Junin, R. and Augustine, A. (2018) A Review of Gas Enhanced Oil Recovery Schemes Used in the North Sea. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 8, 1373-1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-018-0451-6
Brashear, J.P. and Kuuskraa, V.A. (1978) The Potential and Economics of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 30, 12341-1239. https://doi.org/10.2118/6350-PA
Goodlett, G.O., Honarpour, M.M., Chung, F.T. and Sarathi, P.S. (1986) The Role of Screening and Laboratory Flow Studies in EOR Process Evaluation. Society of Petroleum Engineers Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Billings, May 1986, Article No. SPE-15172-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/15172-MS
Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D. and Seright, R.S. (1997) EOR Screening Criteria Revisited-Part 2: Applications and Impact of Oil Prices. Society of Petroleum Engineers Improved Reservoir Engineering, 12, 199-206. https://doi.org/10.2118/39234-PA
Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D. and Seright, R.S. (1997) EOR Screening Criteria Revisited-Part 1: Introduction to Screening Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.2118/35385-PA
Alvarado, V. and Manrique, E. (2010) Chapter 8: EOR’s Current Status. In: Alvarado, V. and Manrique, E., Eds., Enhanced Oil Recovery, Gulf Professional Publishing, Boston, 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-855-6.00014-0 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781856178556000140
Alvarado, V. and Manrique, E. (2010) Enhanced Oil Recovery: Field Planning and Development Strategies. Gulf Professional Publishing, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-30583-8
Karović-Maričić, V., Leković, B. and Danilović, D. (2014) Factors Influencing Successful Implementation of Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects. Podzemni radovi, 22, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.5937/podrad1425041K
Bachu, S. (2016) Identification of Oil Reservoirs Suitable for CO2-EOR and CO2 Storage (CCUS) Using Reserves Databases, with Application to Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 44, 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.11.013
Guerillot, D.R. (1988) EOR Screening with an Expert System. Petroleum Computer Conference, San Jose, June 1988, Article No. SPE-17791-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/17791-MS
Surguchev, L. and Li, L. (2000) IOR Evaluation and Applicability Screening Using Artificial Neural Networks. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3-5 April 2000, Article No. SPE-59308-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/59308-MS
Trujillo Portillo, M.L., Mercado Sierra, D.P., Maya, G.A., Castro Garcia, R.H., Soto, C.P., Perez, H.H. and Gomez, V. (2010) Selection Methodology for Screening Evaluation of Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Methods. Society of Petroleum Engineers Improved Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Lima, December 2010, Article No. SPE-139222-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/139222-MS
Saleh, L.D., Wei, M. and Bai, B. (2014) Data Analysis and Updated Screening Criteria for Polymer Flooding Based on Oilfield Data. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 17, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.2118/168220-PA
Kang, P.S., Lim, J.S. and Huh, C. (2014) Screening Criteria for Application of EOR Processes in Offshore Fields. The 24th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Busan, 15-20 June 2014, 159.
Nageh, M., El Ela, M.A., El Tayeb, E.S. and Sayyouh, H. (2015) Application of Using Fuzzy Logic as an Artificial Intelligence Technique in the Screening Criteria of the EOR Technologies. SPE North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Cairo, September 2015, Article No. SPE-175883-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175883-MS
Gui, B., Yang, Q.Y., Wu, H.J., Zhang, X. and Lu, Y. (2010) Study of the Effects of Low-Temperature Oxidation on the Chemical Composition of a Light Crude Oil. Energy & Fuels, 24, 1139-1145. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901056s
Khodaei Booran, S., Upreti, S.R. and Ein-Mozaffari, F. (2016) Enhanced Oil Recovery with Air Injection: Effect of the Temperature Variation with Time. Energy & Fuels, 30, 3509-3518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02661
Dellinger, S.E., Patton, J.T. and Holbrook, S.T. (1984) CO2 Mobility Control. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24, 191-196. https://doi.org/10.2118/9808-PA
Jia, H., Yuan, C.D., Zhang, Y., Peng, H., Zhong, D. and Zhao, J. (2012) Recent Progress of High-Pressure Air Injection Process (HPAI) in Light oil Reservoir: Laboratory Investigation and Field Application. Society of Petroleum Engineers Heavy Oil Conference Canada, Calgary, June 2012, Article No. SPE-156974-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/156974-MS
Masalmeh, S.K., Wei, L. and Blom, C. (2011) Mobility Control for Gas Injection in Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoirs: Comparison of Foams versus Polymers. Society of Petroleum Engineers Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, September 2011, Article No. SPE-142542-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/142542-MS
Li, K. and Horne, R.N. (2001) An Experimental and Analytical Study of Steam/Water Capillary Pressure. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 4, 477-482. https://doi.org/10.2118/75294-PA
Lacey, M., Hollis, C., Oostrom, M. and Shokri, N. (2017) Effects of Pore and Grain Size on Water and Polymer Flooding in Micromodels. Energy & Fuels, 31, 9026-9034. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01254
Fanchi, J. (2010) Integrated Reservoir Asset Management: Principles and Best Practices. Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-62240-6
Abdus, S. and Ghulam, M.I. (2016) 16-Waterflooding and Waterflood Surveillance.. In: Abdus, S. and Iqbal, G.M., Ed., Reservoir Engineering: The Fundamentals, Simulation, and Management of Conventional and Unconventional Recoveries, Gulf Professional Publishing, Amsterdam, 289-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800219-3.00016-4
Sheng, J.J. (2011) Mobility Control Requirement in EOR Processes. In: Sheng, J.J., Ed., Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: Theory and Practice, Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-745-0.00004-8
Warner, H.R. and Holstein, E.D. (2007) Chapter 12: Immiscible Gas Injection in Oil Reservoirs. In: Lake, L.W., Fanchi, J.R., Arnold, K., Clegg, J.D., Holstein, E.D. and Warner, H.R., Eds., Petroleum Engineering Handbook: Reservoir Engineering and Petrophysics, Vol. 5, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1103-1147
Muggeridge, A., Cockin, A., Webb, K., Frampton, H., Collins, I., Moulds, T. and Salino, P. (2014) Recovery Rates, Enhanced Oil Recovery and Technological Limits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, Article ID: 20120320. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0320
Lyons, W. (2009) Working Guide to Reservoir Engineering. Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston.
Lyons, W.C. and Plisga, G.J. (2011) Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering. 2 Edition, Elsevier, Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington.