Bioenergy Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Abattoir Wastes
- 1 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Oromia, Ethiopia
- 2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Oromia, Ethiopia
Abstract
Energy is the pillar of human economic development. Several energy sources, renewable and non-renewable, have been exploited to assure and sustain the need for sustainable development. However, depletion of non-renewable energy sources forced researchers to search for alternative cost effective and environmental friendly energy sources. Thus, conversion of waste materials into energy has obtained considerable attention. In line with this, the aim of this study is to investigate the improvement of bio-energy production through anaerobic digestion of mixture of wastes from sewage sludge and abattoir sources. The abattoir waste is functioned as a co-substrate. Laboratory scale batch anaerobic co-digestion of the waste is carried out under mesophilic condition for 20 days. Sewage Sludge (SS) alone, and different mix ratios of SS to Abattoir Waste (AW) were analyzed for bioenergy production. Besides, the nutrient values and reduction in volume of the sewage after digestion were determined. The results show that methane productions of 33.8%, 48.3% and 56.9% were obtained for SS alone and for SS:AW mix ratios of 4:1 and 3:2, respectively. The nutrient values of the slurry increased as mix ratio decreased due to the increase in the amount of AW. The obtained results indicate that bio-energy production can be improved through co-digestion of SS using AW as a co-substrate; thus warranting further investigation for the practical application in the energy production.
- Rulkens, W. (2008) Sewage Sludge as a Biomass Resource for the Production of Energy: Overview and Assessment of the Various Options. Energy and Fuels, 22, 9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef700267m
- Braun, R., Brachtl, E. and Grasmug, M. (2003) Codigestion of Proteinaceous Industrial Waste. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 109, 139-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:139
- Hansen, K.H., Angelidaki, I. and Ahring, B.K. (1998) Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure: Inhibition by Ammonia. Water Research, 32, 5-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00201-7
- de Baere, L. (2004) The Role of Anaerobic Digestion in the Treatment of MSW: State of-the-Art. Proceedings of 10th World Congress of Anaerobic Digestion, Vol. 1, 395-400.
- Ghosh, S., Conrad, J.R. and Klass, D.L. (1975) Anaerobic Acidogenesis of Wastewater Sludge. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), 47, 30-45.
- Hawkes, F.R. and Hawkes, D.L. (1987) Anaerobic Digestion. In: Bu’lock, J. and Kristiansen, B., Eds., Basic Biotechnology, Academic Press, London, 337-358.
- van Lier, J.B., et al. (2001) New Perspectives in Anaerobic Digestion. Water Science and Technology, 43, 1-18.
- Fountoulakis, M.S., Petousi, I. and Manios, T. (1849) Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge with Glycerol to Boost Biogas Production. Waste Management, 30, 1849-1853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.011
- Del Borghi, A., Converti, A., Palazzi, E. and Del Borghi, M. (1999) Hydrolysis and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Organic fRaction of Municipal Solid Waste. Bioprocess Engineering, 20, 553-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004490050628
- Gómez, X., Morán, A., Cuetos, M.J. and Sánchez, M.E. (2006) The Production of Hydrogen by Dark Fermentation of Municipal Solid Wastes and Slaughterhouse Waste: A Two-Phase Process. Journal of Power Sources, 157, 727-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.006
- Sosnowski, P., Wieczorek, A. and Ledakowicz, S. (2003) Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Wastes. Advances in Environmental Research, 7, 609-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00049-7
- Lafitte-Trouqué, S. and Forster, C.F. (2000) Dual Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Confectionery Waste. Bioresource Technology, 71, 77-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00043-7