Pretreatment of Wastewater Streams from Petroleum/Petrochemical Industries Using Coagulation
- 1
- 2
- 3
Abstract
Coagulation-flocculation processes using different types of conventional coagulants, namely, ferric chloride (FeCl<sub>3</sub>), aluminum sulfate (AL<sub>2</sub>(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>·18H<sub>2</sub>O), lime and ferrous sulfate (FeSO<sub>4</sub>) were investigated using the Jar-test technique. A further aim is to determine the optimum conditions for the treatment of industrial wastewater effluents i.e. coagulant dosage, mixing rate, temperature and pH control. Under optimal condition of process parameters, coagulation/flocculation process was able to lower the turbidity well below the permissible level (1.8 NTU). The results indicate that ferric chloride had superior efficiency compared with other coagulants with efficient dose of 800 mg/l. The optimal initial pH of the effluents that enhanced the turbidity removal was 8.6. The temperature showed no significant effect on the turbidity removal.
- A. R. Hashem, “Metal Pollution of Sewage Sludge from the Industrial City Yanbu, Saudi Arabia,” Journal of King Saud University, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998, pp. 1-6.
- M. Ahmad, A. S. Bajahlan and W. S. Hammad, “Industrial Effluent Quality, Pollution Monitoring and Environmental Management,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 147, No. 1-3, 2008, pp. 297-306. doi:10.1007/s10661-007-0121-5
- F. Renault, B. Sancey, P.-M. Badot and G. Crini, “Chitosan for Coagulation/Flocculation Processes—An Ecofriendly Approach,” European Polymer Journal, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2009, pp. 1337-1348. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.027
- A. A. Tatsi, A. I. Zouboulis, K. A. Matis and P. Samaras, “Coagulation-Flocculation Pretreatment of Sanitary Landfill Leachates,” Chemosphere, Vol. 53, No. 7, 2003, pp. 737-744. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00513-7
- I. Khouni, B. Marrot, P. Moulin and R. B. Amar, “Decolourization of the Reconstituted Textile Effluent by Different Process Treatments: Enzymatic Catalysis, Coagulation/Flocculation and Nanofiltration Processes,” Desalination, Vol. 268, 2011, pp. 27-37. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.046
- F. AlMubaddal, K. AlRumaihi and A. Ajbar, “Performance Optimization of Coagulation/Flocculation in the Treatment of Wastewater from a Polyvinyl Chloride Plant”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 161, No. 1, 2009, pp. 431-438. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.121
- A. Szygula, E. Guibal, M. A. Palaci′n, M. Ruiz and A. M. Sastre, “Removal of an Anionic Dye (Acid Blue 92) by Coagulation-Flocculation Using Chitosan,” Journal of Environmental Managemet, Vol. 90, No. 10, 2009, pp. 2979-2986. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.002
- M. I. Aguilar, J. Sáez, M. Lloréns, A. Soler, J. F. Ortuno, V. Meseguer and A. Fuentes, “Improvement of Coagulation-Flocculation Process Using Anionic Polyacrylamide as Coagulant Aid,” Chemosphere, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2005, pp. 47-56. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.008
- J. Dosta, J. Rovira, A. Galí, S. Macé and J. Mata-Alvarez, “Integration of a Coagulation/Flocculation Step in a Biological Sequencing Batch Reactor for COD and Nitrogen Removal of Supernatant of an Aerobically Digested Piggery Wastewater,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99, No. 13, 2008, pp. 5722-5730. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.021
- H. Zheng, G. Zhu and S. Jiang, T. Tshukudu, X. Xiang, P. Zhang and Q. He, “Investigations of Coagulation- Flocculation Process by Performance Optimization, Model Prediction and Fractal Structure of Flocs,” Desalination, Vol. 269, No. 1-3, 2011, pp. 148-156. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.054