Mesocyclone Evolution and Differences between Isolated and Embedded Supercells
- 1 Shandong Provincial Meteorological Observatory, Jinan, China
- 2 Shandong Provincial Meteorological Observatory, Jinan, China
- 3 Anhui Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Hefei, China
Abstract
A total of 61 supercells with mesocyclones lasting for at least 6 volume scans were investigated. These storm parame ters and mesocyclone parameters were counted and compared to determine the salient differences between isolated su percells and embedded supercells in different regions. The results showed that the mesocyclone parameters had differ ent evolution characteristics in three stages of mesocyclone. The storm parameters, mesocyclone parameters and severe weather phenomenon had significantly differences between isolated supercells and embedded supercells. The mesocyc lone parameter differences determined the differences in the reflectivity structure and weather phenomenon. The higher base and top of mesocyclone for isolated supercells indicated that the isolated supercells had higher maximum reflecti vity, maximum reflectivity height, cell-based vertically integrated liquid and top of storm cell, and significantly higher probability of hail or large hail than the embedded supercells. The descending lower base of mesocyclone at its mature stage in the region of Jianghuai Plain indicated that the supercells in this region had a higher probability of mesocyc lone-induced tornado.
- K. A. Browning, “Cellular Structure of Convective Storms,” The Meteorological Magazine, Vol. 91, No. 1085, 1962, pp. 341-350.
- K. A. Browning, “Airflow and Precipitation Trajectories within Severe Local Storms which Travel to the Right of the Winds,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1964, pp. 634-639. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021 2.0.CO;2
- B. A. Klimowski, M. R. Hjelmfelt, M. J. Bunkers, D. Sedlacek and L. R. Johnson, “Hailstorm Damage Observed from the GOES-8 Satellite: The 5-6 July 1996 Butte-Meade Storm,” Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 126, No. 3, 1998, pp. 831-834. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126 2.0.CO;2
- E. J. Calianese, J. K. Jordan, E. B. Curran, A. R. Moller and G. Woodall, “The Mayfest High-Precipitation Supercell of 5 May 1995—A Case Study,” The 21st Conference on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, 12-16 August 2002, pp. 105-108.
- X. G. Diao, J. J. Zhu and Z. H. Liu, “Analysis of Three Supercell Storms with Doppler Weather Radar Data,” Acta Meteorologica Sinica, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2011, pp. 211-223. doi:10.1007/s13351-011-0028-5
- D. W. Burgess, “Single Doppler Radar Vortex Recognition: Part I—Mesocyclone Signatures,” The 17th Conference on Radar Meteorology, Seattle, 26-29 October 1976, pp. 97-103.
- J. T. Johnson, P. L. MacKeen, A. Witt, E. De Wayne Mitchell, G. J. Stumpf, M. D. Eilts and K. W. Thomas, “The Storm Cell Identification and Tracking (SCIT) Algorithm: An enhanced WSR-88D Algorithm,” Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1998, pp. 263-276. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013 2.0.CO;2
- G. J. Stumpf, A. Witt, E. D. Mitchell, P. L. Spencer, J. T. Johnson, M. D. Eilts, et al., “The National Severe Storms Laboratory Mesocyclone Detection Algorithm for the WSR-88D,” Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1998, pp. 304-326. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013 2.0.CO;2
- G. A. Tipton, E. D. Howieson, J. A. Margraf and R. R. Lee, “Optimizing the WSR-88D Mesocyclone/Tornadic Vortex Signature Algorithm Using WATADS—A Case Study,” Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 13, No. 2,1998, pp. 367-376. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013 2.0.CO;2
- B. T. Smith, J. L. Guyer and A. R. Dean, “The Climatology, Convective Mode, and Mesoscale Environment of Cool Season Severe Thunderstorms in the Ohio and Tennessee Valleys, 1995-2006,” The 24th Conference on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, 27-31 October 2008. http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/141968.pdf