Past, Present and Future: Urgency of Dealing with Climate Change
- 1 Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA
Abstract
This paper gives an historic perspective on 10 critical phases and actions in advancing an understanding of climate change and taking appropriate domestic and international action. Credit goes to atmospheric scientists for their committed efforts to understand, model and measure the impacts of climate change. Today, greenhouse gases are at a record level and little doubt remains that greenhouse gases (GHG) warm the atmosphere and that human-made climate change is real. Recognizing the urgency of responding to climate change, the 2013 US Climate Action Plan aims to cut carbon emissions and prepare to deal effectively with the economic, social, and environmental impacts of climate change. Many US states, Tribes, and local communities have also begun to take action to reduce GHG emissions and adapt to the impact of climate change, especially on disadvantaged communities. While recognition of the urgency of action on climate change is growing in government and in large parts of the business and financial sector, it has taken over 40 years to get to this point. While an understanding of the reality and impact of climate change has grown, significant efforts to reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and stabilize global warming have not occurred. The problem that society faces is not the absence of scientific knowledge, but rather the need to reduce GHG emissions and create resilient and adaptive responses to climate change. This paper concludes that future successes will need more effective collaboration between government, business, and society to address climate change and greater public understanding of the impacts of climate change on human health and economic well-being.
- Moynihan, D. (1969) Memo on CO2 and Warming. Nixon Library. Press Release. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/03/moynihan-nixon-global-warming_n_634526.html
- Von Neumann, J. (1955) Can We Survive Technology? Fortune, June.
- Oreskes, N. (2007) The Long Consensus of Climate Change. Washington Post. February 1. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/31/AR2007013101808.html
- Kukla, G.J., Matthews, R.K. and Mitchell, J.M. (1972) Guest Editorial: The End of the Present Interglacial. Quaternary Research, 2, 261-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(72)90046-4
- Reeves, R., Gemmill, D., Livezey, R. and Laver, L. (2004) Global Cooling and the Cold War—And a Chilly Beginning for the United States Climate Analysis Center. http://www.meteohistory.org/2004polling_preprints/docs/abstracts/reeves&etal_abstract.pdf
- NAS (1979) Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. http://web.atmos.ucla.edu/~brianpm/download/charney_report.pdf
- World Meteorological Organization (1979) World Climate Program. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/wcp/wcp.html
- National Climate Program Office (1980) National Climate Program: Five-Year Plan. https://archive.org/stream/nationalclimatep00unit/nationalclimatep00unit_djvu.txt
- Seidel, S. and Keyes, D. (1983) Can We Delay a Greenhouse Warming? The Effectiveness and Feasibility of Options to Slow a Build-Up of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere. Strategic Studies Staff, Office of Policy Analysis, US EPA, Washington DC.
- EPA (1989) The Potential Effect of Global Climate Change on the United States. Report to Congress. US EPA, Washington DC.
- EPA (1990) Policy Options for Stabilizing Global Climate. Report to Congress: Main Report. EPA, Washington DC.
- Agrawala, S. (1997) Explaining the Evolution of the IPCC Structure and Process. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs of the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Discussion Paper E-97-05, Cambridge.
- Hecht, A. and Tirpak, D. (1995) Framework Agreement on Climate Change: A Scientific and Policy History. Climatic Change, 29, 371-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01092424
- Houghton, J., Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums, J.J. (Eds.) (1988) Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. WMO, UNEP. Cambridge University Press, London.