Modified Ramsey Rule, Optimal Carbon Tax and Economic Growth
- 1 Faculty of Humanity and Environment, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan
- 2 Institute of Social Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
In contrast to the overlapping-generations model, it is allowable to discount the future utility in a dynasty model without the ethical difficulty related to intergenerational conflicts. Much precedent research uses Ramsey-type optimal growth theory in order to estimate the social discount rate. However, one must note that almost all the formulations neglect the existence of negative intertemporal externalities. This problem is vital when one analyzes the global warming problem mainly caused by the excess concentration of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). This is because an adjoining effect of capital accumulation exists besides the improvement of product capacity, which is reflected in the rate of interest (or equivalently, the marginal productivity of capital). That is, one cannot neglect a negative externality to the future productivity that originates from the excess emissions of CO 2 . Accordingly, following the optimal growth theory, the effective social discount rate should be heightened by a proportional carbon tax to suppress future excess consumption/ emissions than in the case of the existing analyses, which exclude such an intertemporal external diseconomy.
- Ramsey, F.P. (1928) A Mathematical Theory of Saving. Economic Journal, 38, 543-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2224098
- Arrow, K.J., Cline, W.R., Maler, K.-G., Munasinghe, M., Squitieri, R. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1996) Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III, 127-144.
- Nordhaus, W. (2013) The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World. Yale University Press, New Haven.
- Cline, W.R. (1992) The Economics of Global Warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington DC.
- Stern, N. (2007) The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
- Stern, N. (2008) The Economics of Climate Change. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 98, 1-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.1
- Nordhaus, W. (2007) A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 686-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.3.686
- Weitzman, M.L. (2007) A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 703-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.3.703
- Arrow, K., Cooper, M., Gollier, C., Green, B., Heal, G., Newell, R., Nordhaus, W., Pindyck, R., Pizer, W., Portney, P., Steiner, T., Tol, R.S.J. and Weitzman, M. (2013) Determining Benefits and Costs for Future Generations. Science, 341, 349-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1235665
- Gollier, C. (2012) Pricing the Planet’s Future: The Economics of Discounting in an Uncertain World. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Weitzman, M.L. (1998) Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, 201-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1052
- Gollier, C. and Weitzman, M. (2010) How Should the Distant Future Be Discounted When Discount Rates Are Uncertain? Economics Letters, 107, 350-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.03.001
- Otaki, M. (2013) Endogenous Social Discount Rate, Proportional Carbon Tax, and Sustainability: Do We Have the Right to Discount Future Generations’ Utility? Environmental Systems Research, 2, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-2697-2-1