Evaluation on Radar Reflectivity-Rainfall Rate (<i>Z-R</i>) Relationships for Guyana
- 1 Hydrometeorological Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Georgetown, Guyana
- 2 Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, CMA Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
- 3 School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
Abstract
The constant development of science and technology in weather radar results in high-resolution spatial and temporal rainfall estimates and improved early warnings of meteorological phenomena such as flood [1]. Weather radars do not measure the rainfall amount directly, so a relationship between the reflectivity ( Z ) and rainfall rate ( R ), called the Z-R relationship ( Z = aR b ), where a and b are empirical constants, can be used to estimate the rainfall amount. In this research, mathematical techniques were used to find the best climatological Z-R relationships for the Low Coastal Plain of Guyana. The reflectivity data from the S-Band Doppler Weather Radar for February 17 and 21, 2011 and May 8, 2012 together with the daily rainfall depths at 29 rainfall stations located within a 150 km radius were investigated. A climatological Z-R relationship type Z = 200 R 1.6 (Marshall-Palmer) configured by default into the radar system was used to investigate the correlation between the radar reflectivity and the rainfall by gauges. The same data sets were used with two distinct experimental Z-R relationships, Z = 300 R 1.4 (WSR-88D Convective) and Z = 250 R 1.2 (Rosenfeld Tropical) to determine if any could be applicable for area of study. By comprehensive regression analysis, New Z-R and R-Z relationships for each of the three events aforementioned were developed. In addition, a combination of all the samples for all three events were used to produce another relationship called “All in One”. Statistical measures were then applied to detect BIAS and Error STD in order to produce more evidence-based results. It is proven that different Z-R relationships could be calibrated into the radar system to provide more accurate rainfall estimation.
- Meischner, P. (2004) Weather Radar: Principles and Advanced Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 337 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05202-0
- Hunter, S. (1996) WSR-88D Radar Rainfall Estimation: Capabilities, Limitations and Potential Improvements. National Weather Digest, 20, 26-38.
- Moreau, E., Testud, J. and Le Bouar, E. (2009) Rainfall Spatial Variability Observed by X-Band Weather Radar and Its Implication for the Accuracy of Rainfall Estimates. Advances in Water Resources, 32, 1011-1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.11.007
- Wilson, J.W. and Brandes, E.A. (1979) Radar Measurement of Rainfall: A Summary. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 60, 1048-1058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1979)060 2.0.CO;2
- Einfalt, T., Nielsen, K.A., Golz, C., Jensen N.E., Quirmbach, M., Vaes, G. and Vieux, B. (2004) Towards a Roadmap for Use of Radar Rainfall Data in Urban Drainage. Journal of Hydrology, 299, 186-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(04)00365-8
- Yang, D., Goodison, B., Metcalfe, J., Golubev, V., Bates, R., Pangburn, T. and Hanson, C. (1998) “Accuracy of NWS 8” Standard Non-Recording Precipitation Gauge: Results and Application of WMO Inter-Comparison. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 15, 54-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015 2.0.CO;2
- Groisman, P. and Legates, D. (1994) The Accuracy of United States Precipitation Data. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 75, 215-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075 2.0.CO;2
- Brandes, E. and Wilson, J. (1988) Measuring Storm Rainfall by Radar and Rain Gauge. In: Kessler, E., Ed., Instruments and Techniques for Thunderstorm Observation and Analysis, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 171-186.
- Austin, P.M. (1987) Relation between Measured Radar Reflectivity and Surface Rainfall. Monthly Weather Review, 115, 1053-1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115 2.0.CO;2
- (1998) Annex II: Rainfall Measurement. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 27, Agrometeorological Field Stations, Chapter 6. http://www.fao.org/docrep/t7202e/t7202e09.htm
- Burgess, D.W. and Ray, P.S. (1986) Principles of the Radar. In: Ray, P., Ed., Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 85-117.
- Joss, J. and Lee, R. (1995) The Application of Radar-Gauge Comparisons to Operational Precipitation Profile Corrections. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34, 2612-2630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034 2.0.CO;2