Though considered the most democratic method of allocating citizens to office in Classical Greece, sortition (selection by lot) has never been adopted on a large scale by modern democracies (except for juries) and has fallen into oblivion. Recently, however, some political theorists, motivated by deep disappointment with current electoral practices, have been advocating a return to sortition without being sufficiently aware of the complexities involved in their ancient Athenian model. This study tries to explain the roots and ideology of sortition, the ways in which it operated in Athens and the causes of its functional success there for almost two centuries. Proposals of returning to a similar system should pay due attention to the significant role played by elections alongside the lottery in Classical Athens and the precautions taken there to prevent possible harm. In my view , the optimal formula for reform would be a political compromise combining, in one way or another, elections with sortition among volunteering candidates from various quarters of the civic society, selected in due proportions so as to be statistically representative of the demos . Selection by lottery should apply only to groups of people (e.g., committees and councils)—never to individual magistrates.
Bouricius, T. (2013). Democracy through Multi-Body Sortition: Athenian Lessons for the Modern Day. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.156
Brennan, J. (2016). Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Burnheim, J. (2016). The Demarchy Manifesto. London: Academic Press.
Carson, L., & Martin, B. (1999). Random Selection in Politics. London: Praeger Westport.
Coulanges, F. De (1864). La cité antique. Paris: Librairie Hachette.
Courant, D. (2019). Sortition and Democratic Principles: A Comparative Analysis. In J. Gastil, & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Legislature by Lot… (See Below) (pp. 229-248). New York: Verso Books.
Delannoi, G., Dowlen, O., & Stone, P. (2011). The Lottery as a Democratic Institution. Dublin: Policy Institute, SciencesPo.
Dienel, P. C. (1999). Planning Cells: The German Experience. In U. Khan (Ed.), Participation beyond the Ballot Box (pp. 81-93). London: University College Press.
Ehrenberg, V., & Hornblower, S. (1996). Sortition. In S. Hornblower, & A. Spawforth (Eds.), Oxford Classical Dictionary (p. 1426). Oxford: University Press.
Faguet, E. (1910). Le culte de l’incompétence. Paris: éditions Coda.
Fishkin, J. S. (2019). Random Assemblies for Lawmaking: Prospects and Limits. In J. Gasil, & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Legislature by Lot… (See Below) (pp. 75-100). New York: Verso Books.
Foa, R., & Mounk, Y. (2015). Across the Globe, a Growing Disillusionment with Democracy. New York Times, 15 September.
Gastil, J., & Wright, E. O. (2019). Legislature by Lot: Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance. New York: Verso Books.
Glotz, G. (1928). La cité grecque. Paris: éditions Albin Michel. https://doi.org/10.2307/1838560
Guerrero, A. (2014). Forget Voting—It’s Time to Start Choosing Our Leaders by Lottery. Aeon, 23 January.
Hansen, M. H. (1991). The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, F. D. (1965). Two Kinds of Equality. Classica et Medievalia, 26, 101-146.
Headlam, J. W. (1891, repr. 1933). Election by Lot at Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacquet, V., Niessen, C., & Reuchamps, M. (2020). Sortition, Its Advocates and Its Critics: An Empirical Analysis of Citizens’ and MPs’ Support for Random Selection as a Democratic Reform Proposal. International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120949958
Knag, S. (1998). Let’s Toss for It: A Surprising Curb on Political Greed. The Independent Review, 3, 199-209.
Manin, B. (1995). Principes du gouvernement représentatif. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
Marchant, E. C. (1923, repr. 1968). Xenophon, Vol. IV Memorabilia and Oeconomicus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. London: Jarrold.
Norris, P. (1997). Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed Systems. International Political Science Review, 18, 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251297018003005
Ober, J. (1989). Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820511
Pluchino, A., Garofallo, C., Rapisarda, A. et al. (2011). Accidental Politicians: How Randomly Selected Legislators Can Improve Parliament Efficiency. Physica A, 390, 3944-3954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.06.028
Rhodes, P. J. (1981). A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, P. J. (1984). Aristotle, the Athenian Constitution. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Rhodes, P. J. (2003). Ancient Democracy and Modern Ideology. London: Duckworth.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942, repr. 1976). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Sintomer, Y. (2019). From Deliberative to Radical Democracy? Sortition and Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Participations, 11, Article 23.
Stockton, D. (1990). The Classical Athenian Democracy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Sutherland, K. (2018). The Triumph of Election: A Pyrrhic Victory. Rivista di Storia delle Idee, 7, 135-152.
Taylor, C. (2007). The Sociology of Election and Lot in the Athenian Democracy. Hesperia, 76, 323-345. https://doi.org/10.2972/hesp.76.2.323
Van Reybrouck, D. (2016). Against Elections: The Case for Democracy. London: Random House.
Vidmar, N., & Hans, V. P. (2007). American Juries: The Verdict. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Wright, E. O. (2019). The Anti-Capitalist Argument for Sortation. In J. Gastil, & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Legislature by Lot… (See Above) (pp. 39-45). New York: Verso Books.
Zakaras, A. (2010). Lot and Democratic Representation: A Modest Proposal. Constellations, 17, 455-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00608.x