The Phenomenon of Tides in Byzantine Science
- 1 Department of Pedagogy and Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- 2 Department of Pedagogy and Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Abstract
In this work, we explore Byzantine scholars’ views and ideas on tides by revealing the fusion of their scientific, philosophical, and religious thought. In an attempt to bridge the Aristotelian and the Christian cosmology they attributed tides to lunar phases, terrestrial features, or metaphysical forces, weaving int ricate interpretations. Our research revealed that lunar phases were linked to tidal rhythms by Eustathius of Antioch and Basil of Caesarea, in 4 th c. detailing lunar influence on atmospheric and oceanic patterns. Nikephoros Blemmydes, in the 13 th century, emphasized geomorphic explanations, while Nikon the “Metanoite”, in the 10 th century, attributed mystical symbolism to tides. References in Byzantine literature underscored the metaphorical relevance of tides. Ultimately, the study elucidates how Byzantine scholars grappled with integrating diverse worldviews to comprehend the enigmatic tidal phenomenon within their holistic understanding of nature and divinity.
- Angelopoulos, A. A. (1970). Nicholas Kabasilas Chamaetos. His Life and Work. TPatriarchal Foundation for Patristic Studies. (In Greek)
- Bekker, I. (Ed.) (1836). Michaelis Glycae Annales. CSHB, Weber.
- Boissonade, J.-F. (Ed.) (1838). Michael Psellus, De Operatione Daemonum. Fr. Nap. Campe.
- Cartwright, D. E. (1999). Tides: A Scientific History. Cambridge University Press.
- Constantinides, C. N. (1982). Higher Education in Byzantium in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries. Cyprus Research Center.
- Diels, H. (Ed.) (1965). Doxographi Graeci. The Gruyter.
- Doundoulakis, Ε. (2006). Saint Eustathius of Antioch, the Confessor. PhD Dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. (In Greek)
- Gaisford, T. (Ed.) (1834). Suidae Lexicon, II. E Typographeo Academico.
- Hunger, H. (1997). Byzantine Literature, II and III. National Bank of Greece Cultural Foundation. (In Greek)
- Ier, P., & Bekker, I. (Eds.) (1824). Photii Bibliotheca. G. Reimer.
- Kambylis, A., & Reinsch, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). Annae Comnenae Alexias. In Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, Series Berolinensis XL/1. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110881172
- Katsiampoura, G. (2010a). Faith or Knowledge? Normative Relations between Religion and Science in Byzantine Textbooks. Almagest, 1, 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.ALMA.3.7
- Katsiampoura, G. (2010b). The Quadrivium of 1008 and Pachymeres’ Syntagma: Comparing Two Byzantine Quadrivia. In L. del Corso, & O. Pecere (Eds.), Libri di scuola e pratiche didattiche, dall’Antichità al Rinascimento, II (pp. 409-424). Edizioni Università di Cassino.
- Katsiampoura, G. (2018). The Relationship between Alchemy and Natural Philosophy in Byzantine Times. In E. Nicolaidis (Ed.), Greek Alchemy from Late Antiquity to Early Modernity (pp. 119-129). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.DDA-EB.5.116315
- Katsiampoura, G. (2021). Why the Byzantium? From the Point of View of Natural Philosophy and Sciences. ICON, Journal on Byzantine Philosophy, 1, 23-29. (In Greek)
- Katsiampoura, G. (2022). An Appraisal of the Current Status of Research on Byzantine Sciences. Centaurus, 64, 919-924. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.CNT.5.133232