This study highlights the importance of integrating the history of technology into science education to improve primary student teachers’ (undergraduate students of the Department of Pedagogy and Primary Education of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens) understanding of key concepts in science and technology, such as mechanical advantage, criteria for distinguishing types of levers, their applications in everyday life, and the conceptualization of force vectors. Additionally, the research aimed to enhance primary student teachers’ understanding of the Nature of Science (NOS) and the Nature of Technology (NOT), emphasizing that science and technology are distinct yet interrelated and identifying what constitutes technology. To ensure credibility, peer debriefing and thoroughly documented research conditions were employed. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test, were used to evaluate the significance of the results, addressing each research question in detail. The findings revealed a significant improvement in primary student teachers’ comprehension following the intervention compared to the control group, underscoring the effectiveness of the instructional approach. The study also suggests further exploration of simple machines and the incorporation of more extensive mathematical components in future research.
KeywordsHistory of TechnologySimple MachinesNature of Science TeachingNature of Technology Teaching
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching Nature of Science Explicitly in a First-Grade Internship Setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20132
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(200004)37:4 3.0.co;2-2
Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating Knowledge of the Nature of (Whole) Science. Science Education, 95, 518-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
Allchin, D. (2014). From Science Studies to Scientific Literacy: A View from the Classroom. Science & Education, 23, 1911-1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9672-8
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989a). Chapter 1: The Nature of Science. Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press. http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/chap1.htm
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989b). Chapter 3: The Nature of Technology. Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press. http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/chap3.htm
Cardwell, D. S. L. (2001). Wheels, Clocks, and Rockets: A History of Technology. W.W. Norton & Company.
Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change: Considerations for Effective Nature of Science Instruction. Science & Education, 15, 463-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7
Clough, M. P. (2011). The Story behind the Science: Bringing Science and Scientists to Life in Post-Secondary Science Education. Science & Education, 20, 701-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9310-7
Clough, M. P. (2013). Teaching about the Nature of Technology. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.), The Nature of Technology: Implications for Learning and Teaching (pp. 373-390). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-269-3_19
Clough, M. P. (2018). Teaching and Learning about the Nature of Science. Science & Education, 27, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9964-0
Clough, M. P. (2020). Using Stories behind the Science to Improve Understanding of Nature of Science, Science Content, and Attitudes toward Science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Science: Philosophy, History and Education (pp. 513-525). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_28
Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2013). The Nature of Technology: Implications for Learning and Teaching. Sense Publishers. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-6209-269-3
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. D. (2013). Teaching the Nature of Technology: Determining and Supporting Student Learning of the Philosophy of Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 229-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9176-2
Constantinou, C., Hadjilouca, R., & Papadouris, N. (2010). Students’ Epistemological Awareness Concerning the Distinction between Science and Technology. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 143-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903229296
Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing Elementary School Students’ Conceptions of Engineering and Technology. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (pp. 811-820). ASEE. https://peer.asee.org/14836
Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education: Why Does It Matter? Science & Education, 25, 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8
De Vries, M. J. (2016a). Learners’ Philosophies about Technologies. In M. J. De Vries (Ed.), Teaching about Technology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology for Non-philosophers (2nd ed., pp. 85-89). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32945-1_7
De Vries, M. J. (2016b). Philosophy of Technology: What and Why? In M. J. De Vries (Ed.), Teaching about Technology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology for Non-philosophers (2nd ed., pp. 1-10). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32945-1_1
De Vries, M. J. (2016c). Teaching about Technology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology for Non-Philosophers (2nd ed.). Springer International Publishing.
DiGironimo, N. (2011). What Is Technology? Investigating Student Conceptions about the Nature of Technology. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1337-1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.495400
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making Sense of SECONDARY science: Research into Children’s Ideas. Routledge.
English, L. D., Hudson, P., & Dawes, L. (2013). Engineering-based Problem Solving in the Middle School: Design and Construction with Simple Machines. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 3, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1081
Erdogan, C., & Stilman, M. (2014). Incorporating Kinodynamic Constraints in Automated Design of Simple Machines. In 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 2931-2936). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2014.6942966
Erdogan, C., & Stilman, M. (2016). Autonomous Realization of Simple Machines. In M. A. Hsieh, O. Khatib, & V. Kumar (Eds.), Experimental Robotics: The 14th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (pp.471-486). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23778-7_31
European Commission (2014). The Future of Europe Is Science a Report of the President’s Science and Technology Advisory Council (STAC). Publications Office.
Flores, A. (2008). The Mean as the Balance Point: Thought Experiments with Measuring Sticks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39, 741-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701871655
Galluzzi, P. (1987). Leonardo da Vinci: From the “Elementi Macchinali” to the Man-Machine. History and Technology, 4, 235-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341518708581700
Galluzzi, P. (2001). Renaissance Engineers: From Brunelleschi to Leonardo da Vinci. Giunti.
García-Carmona, A. (2021). Improving Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science through an Analysis of the Historical Case of Rosalind Franklin and the Structure of DNA. Research in Science Education, 51, 347-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9798-4
Gardner, P. L. (1993). Textbook Representations of Science-Technology Relationships. Research in Science Education, 23, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02357048
Gardner, P. L. (1999). The Representation of Science-Technology Relationships in Canadian Physics Textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290732
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (10th ed.). Pearson.
Hadjilouca, R., Constantinou, C. P., & Papadouris, N. (2011). The Rationale for a Teaching Innovation about the Interrelationship between Science and Technology. Science & Education, 20, 981-1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9332-1
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2006). Humanizing the Teaching of Physics through Storytelling: The Case of Current Electricity. Physics Education, 41, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/41/1/003
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2018). Teaching the Nature of Science through Storytelling: Some Empirical Evidence from a Grade 9 Classroom. SFU Educational Review, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.21810/sfuer.v10i2.318
Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2017). Understanding Statistics in Psychology with SPSS (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hsu, M.-C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary Teachers’ Views about Teaching Design, Engineering, and Technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314639
Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “General Aspects” Conceptualization as a Pragmatic and Effective Means to Introducing Students to Nature of Science: The General Aspects Conceptualization of NOS. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 667-682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305
Kazempour, M., & Sadler, T. D. (2015). Pre-Service Teachers’ Science Beliefs, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy: A Multi-Case Study. Teaching Education, 26, 247-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2014.996743
Kemp, M. (2011). Leonardo. Oxford University Press.
Kipnis, N. (1996). The Historical-Investigative? Approach to Teaching Science. Science & Education, 5, 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00414317
Klassen, S. (2006). A Theoretical Framework for Contextual Science Teaching. Interchange, 37, 31-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-8399-8
Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an Engineer: Development of a Tool to Investigate Students’ Ideas about Engineers and Engineering. In 2004 Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 9.482.1-9.482.11). ASEE Conferences. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--12831
Kokkotas, P., Rizaki, A., & Malamitsa, K. (2010). Storytelling as a Strategy for Understanding Concepts of Electricity and Electromagnetism. Interchange, 41, 379-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-010-9137-9
Kruse, J. W. (2013a). Implications of the Nature of Technology for Teaching and Teacher Education. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.), The Nature of Technology (pp. 345-369). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-269-3_18
Kruse, J. W. (2013b). Promoting Middle School Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Technology. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.), The Nature of Technology: Implications for Learning and Teaching (pp. 391-410). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-269-3_20
Kubli, F. (1999). Historical Aspects in Physics Teaching: Using Galileo’s Work in a New Swiss Project. Science Education, 8, 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008613706212
Landrus, M. (2010). Leonardo da Vinci’s Giant Crossbow. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-68918-8
Lawson, D. F., Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., L. Strnad, R., & Seekamp, E. (2019). Children Can Foster Climate Change Concern among Their Parents. Nature Climate Change, 9, 458-462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0463-3
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 831-879). Routledge.
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on Teaching and Learning of Nature of Science. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II (pp. 600-620). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203097267
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and Learning Nature of Scientific Knowledge: Is It Déjà Vu All over Again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, Article No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). Reasoning about Structure and Function: Children’s Conceptions of Gears. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199801)35:1 3.0.co;2-x
Leuchter, M., & Naber, B. (2019). Studying Children’s Knowledge Base of One-Sided Levers as Force Amplifiers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56, 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21470
Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2016). Impact of an Engineering Design-Based Curriculum Compared to an Inquiry-Based Curriculum on Fifth Graders’ Content Learning of Simple Machines. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34, 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1077327
McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking Historical Examples to Illustrate Key Aspects of the Nature of Science. Science & Education, 17, 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9081-y
McComas, W. F. (2011). The History of Science and the Future of Science Education. In P. V. Kokkotas, K. S. Malamitsa, & A. A. Rizaki (Eds.), Adapting Historical Knowledge Production to the Classroom (pp. 37-53). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-349-5_3
McComas, W. F. (2014). Nature of Science in the Science Curriculum and in Teacher Education Programs in the United States. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 1993-2023). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_61
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The Role and Character of the Nature of Science in Science Education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 3-39). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47215-5_1
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Nouri, N. (2020). Nature of Science and Classroom Practice: A Review of the Literature with Implications for Effective NOS Instruction. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of Science in Science Instruction (pp. 67-111). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_4
Metz, D., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., Clough, M., & Olson, J. (2007). Building a Foundation for the Use of Historical Narratives. Science & Education, 16, 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9024-z
Moon, F. C. (2007). The Machines of Leonardo da Vinci and Franz Reuleaux: Kinematics of Machines from the Renaissance to the 20th Century. Springer.
National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards: Observe, Interact, Change, Learn. National Academy Press.
Neumann, I., Michel, H., & Papadouris, N. (2020). Blending Nature of Science with Science Content Learning. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of Science in Science Instruction (pp.327-342). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_18
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. National Academies Press.
Niaz, M. (2009). Critical Appraisal of Physical Science as a Human Enterprise: Dynamics of Scientific Progress. Springer.
Nicholl, C. (2005). Leonardo da Vinci: Flights of the Mind. Penguin.
Norbury, J. W. (2006). Working with Simple Machines. Physics Education, 41, 546-550. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/41/6/010
Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A Theoretical Framework for Narrative Explanation in Science. Science Education, 89, 535-563. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063
Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2014). Teaching the Way They Were Taught? Revisiting the Sources of Teaching Knowledge and the Role of Prior Experience in Shaping Faculty Teaching Practices. Higher Education, 68, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9678-9
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections (p. 32). The Nuffield Foundation.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “Ideas-About-Science” Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
Pacey, A. (2001). Meaning in Technology (MIT Press Paperback ed). MIT.
Pleasants, J., Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Miller, G. (2019). Fundamental Issues Regarding the Nature of Technology: Implications for STEM Education. Science & Education, 28, 561-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00056-y
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Rau, G., & Antink-Meyer, A. (2020). Distinguishing Science, Engineering, and Technology. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of Science in Science Instruction (pp.159-176). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_8
Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving Standards in Urban Systemic Reform: An Example of a Sixth Grade Project-Based Science Curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 669-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20021
Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2008). Reviewing the Relations between Teachers’ Knowledge and Pupils’ Attitude in the Field of Primary Technology Education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9055-7
Rosheim, M. E. (2006). Leonardo’s Lost Robots. Springer.
Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science. Science Education, 76, 559-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760602
Schiffer, M., & Bowden, L. (1984). The Role of Mathematics in Science. American Mathematical Society. https://doi.org/10.5948/upo9780883859452
Schizas, D., Psillos, D., & Asimopoulos, S. (2024). Advancing Scientific Literacy: Integrating Nature of Science and Nature of Scientific Inquiry in Teaching Griffith’s and Avery-Macleod-McCarty Experiments. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 20, e2421. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/15522
Sexton, S. S. (2023). Nature of Science and Nature of Technology. In B. Akpan, B. Cavas, & T. Kennedy (Eds.), Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (pp. 13-23). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24259-5_2
Stefanidou, C., & Skordoulis, C. (2017). Primary Student Teachers’ Understanding of Basic Ideas of Nature of Science: Laws, Theories and Models. Journal of Studies in Education, 7, 127-153. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v7i1.10599
Stefanidou, C., Psoma, V., & Skordoulis, C. (2020). Ptolemy’s Experiments on Refraction in Science Class. Physics Education, 55, Article ID: 035027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab7c80
Stinner, A., McMillan, B. A., Metz, D., Jilek, J. M., & Klassen, S. (2003). The Renewal of Case Studies in Science Education. Science and Education, 12, 617-643. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025648616350
Taddei, M., & Zanon, E. (2005). Leonardo’s Machines: Secrets and Inventions in the Da Vinci Codices. Giunti.
Takenouchi, K., & Makizono, M. (2014). Design Exercise Making Use of Classic Engineering Documents. In K. Kikuchi, T. Kanada, T. Otaka, & D. Matsuura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Design Engineering and Science, ICDES 2014, August 31-September 3, 2014, Parkhotel Congress Center Pilsen, Czech Republic: Conference Subject: New Role of Design Engineering and Science (Vol. 2, pp. 22-25). Japan Society for Design Engineering.
Taylor, J. A. (2001). Using a Practical Context to Encourage Conceptual Change: An Instructional Sequence in Bicycle Science. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18014.x
Usher, A. P. (1988). A History of Mechanical Inventions (Revised Edition). Dover.
Van Deventer, J., Wittmann, M. C., Hsu, L., Henderson, C., & McCullough, L. (2007). Comparing Student Use of Mathematical and Physical Vector Representations. In AIP Conference Proceedings (pp. 208-211). AIP. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2820935
Vollebergh, W. A. M., Iedema, J., & Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. (2001). Intergenerational Transmission and the Formation of Cultural Orientations in Adolescence and Young Adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1185-1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01185.x
Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of Technology: Implications for Design, Development, and Enactment of Technological Tools in School Science Classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2875-2905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.698763
Yaşar, Ş., Baker, D., Robinson-Kurpius, S., Krause, S., & Roberts, C. (2006). Development of a Survey to Assess K-12 Teachers’ Perceptions of Engineers and Familiarity with Teaching Design, Engineering, and Technology. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00893.x