Franz Kafka worked for 22 years for an insurance company, writing reports and preparing cases. His legal writings provide an insight into how his work experiences were a source and inspiration for his literary endeavours. Kafka described the alienation and exclusion of the individual in the face of modern bureaucracy. In works such as The Trial and The Castle, the individual is confronted with a baffling series of claims, obstacles and threats; as soon as one hurdle is overcome, another appears. The term “Kafkaesque” has become part of the English vernacular. Kafka’s legal work provides an insight into the problems faced by workers making legal claims, notably the alienation and frustration produced by the process. Today there is a growing recognition in the legal system of the importance of Kafka’s work and his writing, notably The Trial, which is being incorporated into the burgeoning study of law and literature.
Adler, J. (1995). Stepping into Kafka’s Head, Times Literary Supplement. http://www.textkritik.de/rezensionen/kafka/einl_04.htm
Akram, SM. (1999). Scheherezade Meets Kafka: Two Dozen Sordid Tales of Ideological Exclusion. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 14, 28.
Arendt, H. (1981). Franz Kafka, in Franz Kafka: An Anthology of Marxist Criticism. Univ. Press of New England.
Auden, W. H. (1962). The Dyer’s Hand, and Other Essays. New York: Random House.
Bachmann, S. D., Oliver, V., & Burt, M. (2011). Control Orders Post 9-11 and Human Rights in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada: A Kafkaesque Dilemma? Deakin Law Review, 15, 131.
Banakar, R. (2010). In Search of Heimat: A Note on Franz Kafka's Concept of Law. Law and Literature, 22, 463-490.
Batuman, E. (2010). Kafka’s Last Trial. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/magazine/26kafkat.html?pagewanted=all
Blackmore, J. (2009). The Influence of Franz Kafka on American Jurisprudence. http://works.bepress.com/jonathan_blackmore/1
Carter, T. (1993). A Justice Who Makes Time to Read, and Thinks All Lawyers Should, Too. Chicago Daily Law Bull.
Cohen, G. B. (1977). Jews in German Society: Prague 1860-1914. Central European History, 10, 28-54.
Corngold, S., et al. (Eds.) (2009). Franz Kafka: The Office Writings. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Densky, D. (2010). Franz Kafka: The Office Writings (Review). Modernism/Modernity, 17, 957-959.
Dragich, M. J. (1998). Justice Blackmun, Franz Kafka, and Capital Punishment. Missouri Law Review, 63, 853.
Finet, S. (1988). Franz Kafka’s Trial as Symbol in Judicial Opinions. Legal Studies Forum, 12, 23-35.
Grazin, I. (1999). Kafka’s Myth of Law in the Context of the Legal Irrationality Inspired by the Russian Post-Communist Market. Michigan State University-DCL Journal of International Law, 8, 335-65.
Guthrie, R., Goldacre, L., & Claydon, W. (2008). Workers’ Compensation Dispute Resolution Procedures in Western Australia—The New Regime: [Paper in Special Edition: Alternative Dispute Resolution]. Law and Justice Journal, 8, 46-76.
Hawes, J. (2008). Why You Should Read Kafka Before You Waste Your Life (pp. 212-214). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Hermsdorf, K., & Wagner, B. (Eds.) (2004). Franz Kafka: AmtlicheSchriften. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
Howard, J. D. (1998). Indigenous Legal Issues. In the Wake of Terra Nullius. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 21, 132-134.
Kafka, F. (1961). Metamorphosis and Other Stories, trans. Will and Edwin Muir. Mitcham: Penguin.
Kafka, F. (1977). Letters to Family, Friends, and Editors. New York: Schocken Books, 58.
Kafka, F. (1995). The Complete Stories. In N. N. Glatzer (Ed.), New York: Schocken Books, 220.
Kafka, F. (1999). The Trial. New York: Schocken Books.
Kafka, F. (2004). Franz Kafka: Amtliche Schriften. In K. Hermsdorf, & B. Wagner (Eds.), Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
Kershaw, R. B. (2009). Kafka’s the Trial: An Enigma Encountered. The Journal Jurisprudence, 1, 307.
Kraus, A. W. (1999). Assessing Mr. Samsa’s Employee Rights: Kafka and the Art of the Human Resource Nightmare. American Bar Association, The Labor Lawyer, 15, 309-319.
Litowitz, D. E. (2002). Franz Kafka’s Outsider Jurisprudence. Law & Social Inquiry, 27, 103-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2002.tb01109.x
Lukács, G. (2000). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 224.
Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I. Book One: The Process of Production of Capital. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/
Morgan, E. (1999). In the Penal Colony: Internationalism and the Canadian Constitution. University of Toronto Law Journal, 49, 447-474.
Murray, N. (2004). Kafka: A Biography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 38.
Pawell, E. (1997). The Nightmare of Reason: A Life of Franz Kafka. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 183.
Pinaire, B. (2007). The Essential Kafka: Definition, Distention, and Dilution in Legal Rhetoric. University of Louisville Law Review, 113, 151.
Posner, R. A. (1986). Law and Literature: A Relation Reargued. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Preece, J. (2002). The Cambridge Companion to Kafka. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131-132.
Rowe, M. (2002). Metamorphosis: Defending the Human. Literature and Medicine, 21, 264-280.
Singer, S. (2006). Franz Kafka-Serious about Your Safety. Salmagundi, 150/151, 311.
Zizek, S. (1995). Ideology between Fiction and Fantasy. Cardozo Law Review, 1511, 1511.
Ziolkowski, T. (2003). Mirror of Justice: Literary Reflections of Legal Crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 225.
West, R. (1986). Submission, Choice, and Ethics: A Rejoinder to Judge Posner. Harvard Law Review, 99, 1449.
Weisbrod, C. (1993). Family Governance: A Reading of Kafka’s Letter to His Father. University of Toledo Law Review, 689, 686.
Westbrook, D. A. (2003). Triptych: Three Meditations on How Law Rules After Globalization. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 12, 337.
Wood, M. (2008). Double Thought. London Review of Books, 30, 3-5.