Background: Urosepsis is life-threatening sepsis that leads to organ dysfunction and results from a defective response to a urinary tract infection; the major precipitating is obstructive uropathy in the upper or lower urinary tract (UT). The magnitude and burden of bacteria that caused uropathy were reported to increase annually. In 30% of all septic patients who were diagnosed with urosepsis, 1.5% of them were found in urology and a quarter due to hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (HAUTIs). This study aims to determine the clinical pattern and the frequency of commonly used antibiotics against bacteria associated with urosepsis among Sudanese patients. Methods: This was a cross sectional laboratory-based study, study subjects were recruited from patients attended to Gezira Hospital for Renal diseases and surgery (GHRDS) and was diagnosed, on clinical and laboratory basis, to have urosepsis. Hundred (n = 100) urine samples were collected and inoculated on cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient agar (CLED) media and identify using the suitable biochemical test and performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion technique for selected antimicrobial agents, according to clinical laboratory standard institute (CLSI) guidelines. Results: Amongst urosepsis infection the frequency of E. coli , S. aureus , Proteus mirabilis , Klebseilla pneumonia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were (37%, 21%, 10%, 6%, 4% respectively). Resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics was high, ranging from 17% for meropenem to 100% for cefepime. P. aeruginosa was multidrug resistant compared with other isolates. Conclusions: There was high rate of antibiotic resistance against the common causes of urosepsis in GHRDS, and this reflects the importance of culture and sensitivity test and necessitates adoption of guidelines for selection of suitable antibiotic.
KeywordsUrosepsisAntimicrobial SusceptibilityGezira Hospital for Renal Diseases and SurgerySudan
Porat, A., Bhutta, B.S. and Kesler, S. (2022) Urosepsis. In: StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482344/
Ryan, J., O’Neill, E. and McLornan, L. (2021) Urosepsis and the Urologist! Current Urology, 15, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000006
Wagenlehner, F.M.E., Pilatz, A., Weidner, W. and Naber, K.G. (2016) Urosepsis: Overview of the Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges. In: Mulvey, M.A., Klumpp, D.J. and Stapleton, A.E., Eds., Urinary Tract Infections, ASM Press, Washington DC, 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555817404.ch8 http://doi.wiley.com/10.1128/9781555817404.ch8
Bonkat, G., Cai, T., Veeratterapillay, R., Bruyère, F., Bartoletti, R., Pilatz, A., et al. (2019) Management of Urosepsis in 2018. European Urology Focus, 5, 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.003
Dreger, N.M., Degener, S., Ahmad-Nejad, P., Wöbker, G. and Roth, S. (2015) Urosepsis—Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 112, 837-848. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0837
Tandoğdu, Z., Bartoletti, R., Cai, T., Çek, M., Grabe, M., Kulchavenya, E., et al. (2016) Antimicrobial Resistance in Urosepsis: Outcomes from the Multinational, Multicenter Global Prevalence of Infections in Urology (GPIU) Study 2003-2013. World Journal of Urology, 34, 1193-1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1722-1
Uchvatkin, G.V., Gaivoronskiy, E.A. and Slesarevskaya, M.N. (2020) Urosepsis. Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. Urology Reports (St. Petersburg), 10, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved10181-91
Qiang, X.-H., Yu, T.-O., Li, Y.-N. and Zhou, L.-X. (2016) Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study. BioMed Research International, 2016, Article ID: 9028924. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9028924
Wagenlehner, F.M., Lichtenstern, C., Rolfes, C., Mayer, K., Uhle, F., Weidner, W., et al. (2013) Diagnosis and Management for Urosepsis: Items in Urosepsis. International Journal of Urology, 20, 963-970. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12200
Scotland, K. and Lange, D. (2018) Prevention and Management of Urosepsis Triggered by Ureteroscopy. Research and Reports in Urology, 10, 43-49. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S128071
Yang, X., Ye, W., Qi, Y., Ying, Y. and Xia, Z. (2021) Overcoming Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria through Antibiotics Delivery in Surface-Engineered Nano-Cargos: Recent Developments for Future Nano-Antibiotics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9, Article ID: 696514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.696514
Wagenlehner, F.M.E., Tandogdu, Z., Bjerklund, Johansen, T.E. (2017) An Update on Classification and Management of Urosepsis. Current Opinion in Urology, 27, 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000364
Capsoni, N., Bellone, P., Aliberti, S., Sotgiu, G., Pavanello, D., Visintin, B., et al. (2019) Prevalence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Patients Coming from the Community with Sepsis Due to Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, 14, Article No. 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-019-0185-4
Erb, S., Frei, R., Tschudin Sutter, S., Egli, A., Dangel, M., Bonkat, G., et al. (2018) Basic Patient Characteristics Predict Antimicrobial Resistance in E. coli from Urinary Tract Specimens: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 5246 Urine Samples. Swiss Medical Weekly, 148, Article No. w14660. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14660
Chanda, A., Mahemood, Z., Zubair, M., Vegensa, A.R., Tharayil, A.G.M., Ganaw, A., Matthias, R. and Al Musalmani, M. (2020) Clinical Management of Shock—The Science and Art of Physiological Restoration. IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73805 https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=4zj8DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP12&dq=Chanda,+A.,+Mahemood,+Z.,+Zubair,+M.,+Vegensa,+A.R.,+Tharayil,+A.G.M.,+Ganaw,+A.,+Matthias,+R.+and+Al+Musalmani,+M.,+2020.+Urosepsis:+Flow+is+Life.+Clinical+Management+of+Shock:+the+Science+and+Art+of+Physiological+Restoration,+p.177.&ots=gPyC-56nwj&sig=mRhU11HQ50xG1tiPe_e_LwNRXb8#v=onepage&q&f=false
Shaikh, N., Amara, U.E., Hassan, J., Qazi, Z., Chanda, A., Mahemood, Z., et al. (2020) Urosepsis: Flow Is Life. In: Stawicki, P. and Swaroop, S.M., Eds., Clinical Management of Shock—The Science and Art of Physiological Restoration, IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82262 https://www.intechopen.com/books/clinical-management-of-shock-the-science-and-art-of-physiological-restoration/urosepsis-flow-is-life
Muhammad, A.S., Onwuasoanya, U.E., Mohammad, Y., Agwu, N.P., Abdulwahab-Ahmed, A. and Mungadi, I.A. (2021) Presentation, Risk Factors, Microbiological Pattern and Management of Urosepsis in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria. Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences, 1, 1-7.
Goveas, B. (2017) Urosepsis: A Simple Infection Turns Toxic. The Nurse Practitioner, 42, 53-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000520425.91534.b8
Mourmouris (2014) Obstructive Uropathy: From Etiopathology to Therapy. World Journal of Nephrology and Urology, 3, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjnu154w http://www.wjnu.org/index.php/wjnu/article/view/154
Zhao, Q., Yan, C., Dan, M. and Jia, H. (2021) Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Urinary Retention after Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine, 100, Article No. e26064. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026064
Li, F., Song, M., Xu, L., Deng, B., Zhu, S. and Li, X. (2019) Risk Factors for Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection among Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75, 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13863
Peach, B.C., Garvan, G.J., Garvan, C.S. and Cimiotti, J.P. (2016) Risk Factors for Urosepsis in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 2, Article ID: 233372141663898. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721416638980
Peach, B.C., Li, Y. and Cimiotti, J.P. (2021) Urosepsis in Older Adults: Epidemiologic Trends in Florida. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 7, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1851432
Sato, T., Fujita, H., Takahashi, M., Hatta, M., Aoki, H. and Ishidoya, S. (2017) Correspondence of Polymicrobial Bacteriuria in the Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection of the Premenopausal Woman. The Japanese Journal of Urology, 108, 24-29. https://doi.org/10.5980/jpnjurol.108.24
Yamamichi, F., Shigemura, K., Kitagawa, K., Takaba, K., Tokimatsu, I., Arakawa, S., et al. (2017) Shock Due to Urosepsis: A Multicentre Study. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 11, E105-E109. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4097
Thornton, H.V., Hammond, A. and Hay, A.D. (2018) Urosepsis: A Growing and Preventable Problem? British Journal of General Practice, 68, 493-494.
Owrangi, B., Masters, N., Kuballa, A., O’Dea, C., Vollmerhausen, T.L. and Katouli, M. (2018) Invasion and Translocation of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Urosepsis and Patients with Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 37, 833-839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3176-4
Dadi, B.R., Abebe, T., Zhang, L., Mihret, A., Abebe, W. and Amogne, W. (2020) Distribution of Virulence Genes and Phylogenetics of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli among Urinary Tract Infection Patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases, 20, Article No. 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4844-z
Gajdács, M., ábrók, M., Lázár, A. and Burián, K. (2020) Increasing Relevance of Gram-Positive Cocci in Urinary Tract Infections: A 10-Year Analysis of Their Prevalence and Resistance Trends. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 17658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74834-y
Paulsen, J., Mehl, A., Askim, Å., SolligÅrd, E., åsvold, B.O. and Damås, J.K. (2015) Epidemiology and Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection and Sepsis in a Norwegian County 1996-2011: An Observational Study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 15, Article No. 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0849-4
Schaffer, J.N. and Pearson, M.M. (2016) Proteus mirabilis and Urinary Tract Infections. In: Mulvey, M.A., Klumpp, D.J. and Stapleton, A.E., Eds., Urinary Tract Infections, ASM Press, Washington DC, 383-433. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555817404.ch17 http://doi.wiley.com/10.1128/9781555817404.ch17
Dimitrijevic, Z., Paunovic, G., Tasic, D., Mitic, B. and Basic, D. (2021) Risk Factors for Urosepsis in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Urinary Tract Infections. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 14414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93912-3
Bassetti, M., Vena, A., Croxatto, A., Righi, E. and Guery, B. (2018) How to Manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Drugs Context, 7, Article ID: 212527. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.212527
Bassetti, M., Vena, A., Russo, A., Croxatto, A., Calandra, T. and Guery, B. (2018) Rational Approach in the Management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 31, 578-586. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000505
Guliciuc, M., Maier, A.C., Maier, I.M., Kraft, A., Cucuruzac, R.R., Marinescu, M., et al. (2021) The Urosepsis—A Literature Review. Medicina, 57, Article No. 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090872
World Health Organization (2017, February 27) WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics Are Urgently Needed. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed
Lertwattanachai, T., Montakantikul, P., Tangsujaritvijit, V., Sanguanwit, P., Sueajai J., Auparakkitanon, S., et al. (2020) Clinical Outcomes of Empirical High-Dose Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Intensive Care, 8, Article No. 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00442-7
Yarlagadda, K., Shrimanker, I. and Nookala, V.K. (2019) Catheter-Associated Hafnia alvei-Induced Urosepsis. Cureus, 11, Article No. e6471. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6471 https://www.cureus.com/articles/24685-catheter-associated-hafnia-alvei-induced-urosepsis
Medina-Polo, J., Gil-Moradillo, J., Justo-Quintas, J., González-Padilla, D.A., García-Rojo, E., González-Díaz, A., et al. (2020) Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) in a Surgical Urology Ward: Observational Study—Analysis of the Problem and Strategies for Implementation. World Journal of Urology, 38, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02648-3