Multiple chromosomes in bacteria are designated as a larger primary chromosome (CI) and smaller accessory chromosomes (CII and CIII). Although previous studies examined multiple chromosomes in several bacterial species, the evolutionary mechanisms for the origin of CIIs still remain unclear. In this study, the four following hypotheses were tested. 1) CIIs exhibit lower sequence conservation and sequence divergence compared to their corresponding CIs across species of Proteobacteria . 2) The differential sequence divergence of CI and CII depends on pathogenic and non-pathogenic lifestyles. 3) CIIs harbor a higher level of horizontal gene transfers (HGTs) than CIs. 4) Orthologs located on CIIs experience less purifying selection than their corresponding orthologs on CIs. Results reveal a higher level of sequence conservation of CIs than the sequence conservation of CIIs. There is no significant difference in HGT estimates between CIs and CIIs. A majority of orthologous genes of CIs and CIIs experience purifying selection; however, genes on CIIs were significantly less constrained than the corresponding ones on CIs. This finding is true for both pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria, but the selective constraints for non-pathogenic bacteria are relatively less constrained. It was concluded that the differential selective constraint is a potent driving force for the rapid evolution of CII. Therefore, gene expression analysis at the transcriptome and proteome levels may shed light on the gene regulation mechanisms that might affect the sequence divergence between CI and CII.
KeywordsMultiple Chromosomes<i>Proteobacteria</i>Horizontal Gene TransferSelective ConstraintPathogenic and Non-pathogenic Lifestyles
Suwanto, A. and Kaplan, S. (1989) Physical and Genetic Mapping of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 Genome: Genome Size, Fragment Identification, and Gene Localization. Journal of Bacteriology, 171, 5840-5849. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.171.11.5840-5849.1989
Suwanto, A. and Kaplan, S. (1989) Physical and Genetic Mapping of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 Genome: Presence of Two Unique Circular Chromosomes. Journal of Bacteriology, 171, 5850-5859. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.171.11.5850-5859.1989
Michaux, S., Paillisson, J., Carles-Nurit, M.J., Bourg, G., Allardet-Servent, A. and Ramuz, M. (1993) Presence of Two Independent Chromosomes in the Brucella melitensis 16M Genome. Journal of Bacteriology, 175, 701-705. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.3.701-705.1993
Allardet-Servent, A., Michaux-Charachon, S., Jumas-Bilak, E., Karayan, L. and Ramuz, M. (1993) Presence of One Linear and One Circular Chromosome in the Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 Genome. Journal of Bacteriology, 175, 7869-7874. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.24.7869-7874.1993
Zuerner, R.L., Herrmann, J.L. and Girons, I.S. (1993) Comparison of Genetic Maps for Two Leptospira interrogans serovars Provides Evidence for Two Chromosomes and Intraspecies Heterogeneity. Journal of Bacteriology, 175, 5445-5451. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.17.5445-5451.1993
Winterstein, C. and Ludwig, B. (1998) Genes Coding for Respiratory Complexes Map on All Three Chromosomes of the Paracoccus denitrificans Genome. Archives of Microbiology, 169, 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002030050572
Trucksis, M., Michalski, J., Deng, Y.K. and Kaper, J.B. (1998) The Vibrio cholerae Genome Contains Two Unique Circular Chromosomes. PNAS, 95, 14464-14469. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.24.14464
Mardis, E.R. (2008) The Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing Technology on Genetics. Trends in Genetics, 24, 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.007
Choudhary, M., Cho, H., Bavishi, A., Trahan, C. and Myagmarjav, B. (2012) Evolution of Multipartite Genomes in Prokaryotes. In: Pontarotti, P., Ed., Evolutionary Biology: Mechanisms and Trends, Springer, New York, 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30425-5_17
Choudhary, M., Zanhua, X., Fu, Y.X. and Kaplan, S. (2007) Genome Analyses of Three Strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Evidence of Rapid Evolution of Chromosome II. Journal of Bacteriology, 189, 1914-1921. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01498-06
Bavishi, A., Abhishek, A., Lin, L. and Choudhary, M. (2010) Complex Prokaryotic Genome Structure: Rapid Evolution of Chromosome II. Genome, 53, 675-687. https://doi.org/10.1139/G10-046
Darling, A.C.E., Mau, B., Blattner, F.R. and Perna, N.T. (2004) Mauve: Multiple Alignment of Conserved Genomic Sequence with Rearrangements. Genome Research, 14, 1394-1403. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2289704
Langille, M.G. and Brinkman, F.S. (2009) Island Viewer: An Integrated Interface for Computational Identification and Visualization of Genomic Islands. Bioinformatics, 25, 664-665. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp030
Azad, R.K., Jani, M. and Mathee, K. (2016) Identification of Novel Genomic Islands in Liverpool Epidemic Strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Segmentation and Clustering. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01210
Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. and Lipman, D.J. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 3389-3402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Zhou, Y. and Landweber, L.F. (2007) BLASTO: A Tool for Searching Orthologous Groups. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, W678-W682. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm278
Zhang, Z., Li, J., Zhao, X., Wang, J., Ka-ShuWong, G. and Yu, J. (2006) KaKs Calculator: Calculating Ka and Ks through Model Selection and Model Averaging. Genomics, Proteomics, & Bioinformatics, 4, 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-0229(07)60007-2
Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment with High Accuracy and High Throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1792-1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
Suyama, M., Torrents, D. and Bork, P. (2006) PAL2NAL: Robust Conversion of Protein Sequence Alignments into the Corresponding Codon Alignments. Nucleic Acids Research, 34, W609-W612. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl315
Jain, R., Rivera, M.C., Moore, J.E. and Lake, J.A. (2003) Horizontal Gene Transfer Accelerates Genome Innovation and Evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20, 1598-1602. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3801
Caro-Quintero, A. and Konstantinidis, K.T. (2014) Inter-Phylum HGT Has Shaped the Metabolism of Many Mesophilic and Anaerobic Bacteria. The ISME Journal, 9, 958-967. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.193
Price, M.N., Dehal, P.S. and Arkin, A.P. (2008) Horizontal Gene Transfer and the Evolution of Transcriptional Regulation in Escherichia coli. Genome Biology, 9, R4. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r4
Nei, M. (1988) Relative Roles of Mutation and Selection in the Maintenance of Genetic Variability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 319, 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1988.0069
Pál, C., Papp, B. and Lercher, M.J. (2006) An Integrated View of Protein Evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1838
Cooper, V.S., Vohr, S.H., Wrocklage, S.C. and Hatcher, P.J. (2010) Why Genes Evolve Faster on Secondary Chromosomes in Bacteria. PLOS Computational Biology, 6, e1000732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000732
Robinson, M., Lilley, R., Little, S., Emtage, J.S., Yarranton, G., Stephens, P., Millican, A., Eaton, M. and Humphreys, G. (1984) Codon Usage Can Affect Efficiency of Translation of Genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research, 12, 6663-6671. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/14.19.7737