XRF Standardless Comparison of Mining Head and Tail Grades to Screen and Display Ore Processing Recoveries
- 1 Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
- 2 Environmental Engineering & Public Health, LLC, El Paso, Texas, USA
- 3 Texas Mineral Resources Corporation, Sierra Blanca, Texas, USA
Abstract
Separation of target elements or minerals from their host rock or ore is essential to successful mining operation. The inevitable loss of a portion of the desired material that accompanies each step in the extraction process must be documented to develop the operational protocol. Superposition of the characteristic X-ray fluorescence spectra of head (crushed rock ore particles, pre-processing) and tail (post-processing particles) samples provides a direct visual comparison of relative peak sizes, and thereby the relative concentrations, of elements of interest. If the head and tail peaks are identical, none of the element was recovered in the extraction process. At the other extreme if the tail peak “flat lines”, i.e. , there is no peak, there was 100% recovery of that element. Standardless visual comparison is valid if the same mass of identical starting material is incorporated into the head and tail sample analysis pucks, and XRF analytical conditions are identical. The considerable time and expense of acquiring and calibrating the standards associated with XRF analysis of 75 or more elements are avoided, a significant advantage during initial broad screening of an experimental extraction procedure. Full quantitation by XRF or an alternate technique can proceed at a later project stage, if desired. The approach retains and presents all features of the original data, thus eliminating questions about data quality, standards and their calibration, and data manipulation in processing from raw counts to concentrations in printout tables. This form of display is ideal for both the mining professional and such less technical groups as corporate staff, investors, regulators, and the public. Examples presented herein are for heap leaching; the protocol can be applied as well to any of the other traditional ore processing and beneficiation procedures, e.g., gravity concentration, magnetic and electrical separation, froth flotation, and ore sorting.
- Wills, B.A. and Finch, J. (2015) Mineral Processing Technology. 8th Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
- Habashi, F. (2003) Metals from Ores. An Introduction to Extractive Metallurgy. Métallurgie Extractive Québec, Québec.
- Rosenqvist, T. (2004) Principles of Extractive Metallurgy. 2nd Edition, Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim.
- Metso Mining and Construction (2015) Basics in Mineral Processing. 354 p. http://www.metso.com/miningandconstruction/MaTobox7.nsf/DocsByID/EAE6CA3 B8E216295C2257E4B003FBBA6/$File/Basics-in-minerals-processing.pdf
- Gupta, A. and Yan, D. (2016) Mineral Processing Design and Operation. 2nd Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
- Rao, G.S.R. (2015) Mineral Processing Techniques. Zorba Publishers, Gurgaon (India).
- Wills, B.A. and Barley, R.W. (2012) Mineral Processing at a Crossroads: Problems and Prospects. Springer, Rotterdam.
- Zanbak, C. (2012) Heap Leaching Technique in Mining within the Context of Best Available Techniques (BAT). The European Association of Mining Industries, Metal Ores & Industrial Minerals, 33 p. http://www.euromines.org/files/mining-europe/mining-techniques/batforheapleaching -feb2013-c.zanbak-euromines.pdf
- Bartlett, R.W. (1997) Metal Extraction from Ores by Heap Leaching. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 28b, 529-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11663-997-0026-2
- Dhawan, J., Safarzadeh, M.S., Miller, J.D., Rajamani, R.K. and Moats, M.S. (2012) Insights into Heap Leach Technology. Proceedings of the 2012 SME Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Washington, 19-22 February 2012, 560-567.
- Ghorbani, Y., Franzidis, J.-P. and Petersen, J. (2015) Heap Leaching Technology—Current State, Innovations and Future Directions: A Review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2015.1115990
- Caceres, O. (2013) Lessons Learned in Heap Leaching Technology Implementation. The First International Heap Leach Solutions Conference, 22-25 September 2013, Vancouver-Canada. http://mining.solutions/heapleach/2013/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Omar-Caceres- Heap-Leaching-technology-Implementation-Lessons-learned.pdf
- Scheffel, R. (2010) Heap Leaching Design for Success—A Case Study. Low-Grade Uranium Dump and Heap Leach Technical Meeting, 29-31 March 2010, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section, Vienna International Center, WagramerStrasse, Vienna, Austria. https://www.iaea.org/OurWork/ST/NE/NEFW/documents/RawMaterials/TM_LGUO/ 5f%20Scheffel%20Heap%20Leach%20Design.pdf