Second-Order MaxEnt Predictive Modelling Methodology. I: Deterministically Incorporated Computational Model (2nd-BERRU-PMD)
- 1 Center for Nuclear Science and Energy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
Abstract
This work presents a comprehensive second-order predictive modeling (PM) methodology designated by the acronym 2 nd -BERRU-PMD . The attribute “2 nd ” indicates that this methodology incorporates second-order uncertainties (means and covariances) and second-order sensitivities of computed model responses to model parameters. The acronym BERRU stands for “Best- Es t imate Results with Reduced Uncertainties” and the last letter (“ D ”) in the acronym indicates “deterministic,” referring to the deterministic inclusion of the computational model responses. The 2 nd -BERRU-PMD methodology is fundamentally based on the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) principle. This principle is in contradistinction to the fundamental principle that underlies the extant data assimilation an d /or adjustment procedures which minimize in a least-square sense a subjective user-defined functional which is meant to represent the discrepancies between measured and computed model responses. It is shown that the 2 nd -BERRU-PMD methodology generalizes and extends current data assimilation and/or data adjustment procedures while overcoming the fundamental limitations of these procedures. In the accompanying work (Part II), the alternative framework for developing the “second- order MaxEnt predictive modelling methodology” is presented by incorporating probabilistically (as opposed to “deterministically”) the computed model responses.
- Sasaki, Y.K. (1955) A Fundamental Study of the Numerical Prediction Based on the Variational Principle. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 33, 262-275. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1923.33.6_262
- Sasaki, Y.K. (1958) An Objective Analysis Based on the Variational Method. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 36, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1923.36.3_77
- Eckart, C. (1960) Hydrodynamics of Ocean and Atmosphere. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Humi, I., Wagschal, J.J. and Yeivin, Y. (1964) Multi-Group Constants from Integral Data. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 31 August-9 September 1964, 398.
- Lewis, J.M., Lakshmivarahan, S. and Dhall, S.K. (2006) Dynamic Data Assimilation: A Least Square Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526480
- Lahoz, W., Khattatov, B. and Ménard, R. (2010) Data Assimilation: Making Sense of Observations. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74703-1
- Faragó, I., Havasi, á. and Zlatev, Z. (2013) Advanced Numerical Methods for Complex Environmental Models: Needs and Availability. Bentham Science Publishers, Bussum. https://doi.org/10.2174/97816080577881130101
- Cacuci, D.G., Navon, M.I. and Ionescu-Bujor, M. (2014) Computational Methods for Data Evaluation and Assimilation. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
- Rowlands, J., et al. (1973) The Production and Performance of the Adjusted Cross-Section Set FGL5. Proceedings International Symposium on Physics of Fast Reactors, Tokio. http://www.cern.ch/root
- Gandini, A. and Petilli, M. (1973) A Code Using the Lagrange’s Multipliers Method for Nuclear Data Adjustment. CNEN-RT/FI(73)39, Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare, Rome.
- Kuroi, H. and Mitani, H. (1975) Adjustment to Cross-Section Data to Fit Integral Experiments by Least Squares Method. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 12, 663-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1975.9733172
- Dragt, J.B., Dekker, J.W.M., Gruppelaar, H. and Janssen, A.J. (1977) Methods of Adjustment and Error Evaluation of Neutron Capture Cross Sections. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 62, 117-129. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-3
- Cacuci, D.G. (2014) Predictive Modeling of Coupled Multi-Physics Systems: I. Theory. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 70, 266-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.027