Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Peculiarity of Numerical Solving the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations
Department of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
- 1 Department of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
American Journal of Computational Mathematics·Volume 04 (2014)·Pages 304–310·Published 29 August 2014·DOI10.4236/ajcm.2014.44026
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
The analysis of integrability of the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations shows that these equations have the solutions of two types: 1) solutions that are defined on the tangent nonintegrable manifold and 2) solutions that are defined on integrable structures (that are realized discretely under the conditions related to some degrees of freedom). Since such solutions are defined on different spatial objects, they cannot be obtained by a continuous numerical simulation of derivatives. To obtain a complete solution of the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations by numerical simulation, it is necessary to use two different frames of reference.
KeywordsSolutions of Two TypesNonintegrable Manifolds and Integrable StructuresDiscrete TransitionsTwo Different Frames of Reference
- Clarke, J.F. and Machesney, M. (1964) The Dynamics of Real Gases. Butterworths, London.
- Petrova, L.I. (2009) Relationships between Discontinuities of Derivatives on Characteristics and Trajectories. Computational Mathematics and Modeling, 20, 367-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10598-009-9043-0
- Smirnov, V.I. (1957) A Course of Higher Mathematics. Moscow, Tech. Theor. Lit., 4.
- Petrova, L.I. (2010) Role of Skew-Symmetric Differential Forms in Mathematics. http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.4757