Intellectual Property in Post-Corona Times: Managing the Future
- 1 Splanemann Patent Attorneys, Munich, Germany
- 2 Meitinger & Partner Patent Attorneys, Munich, Germany
Abstract
After Corona times companies are more reliant on the optimum usage of their scarce production resources, like financial or human capital. Intellectual property, like patents, must be used as efficiently as possible. In this context, it is required to focus available financial resources on those property rights that yield to the greatest impact. Other patents that protect subject-matter of little or no interest to market participants waste company resources and form negative financial assets. Such subject-matter does not require patents as prohibition rights, since market participants voluntarily choose not to use the invention. Surprisingly, many firms often hold numerous self-generated patents, which they would never be willing to purchase from a third party. The methods of Lean IP facilitate cost savings for patent portfolio management of up to 90% without any loss of its original impact. All tools of Lean IP Management are directed to cost efficient handling of IP rights, while IP rights that form negative assets are consequently abandoned. One of the basic principles of Lean IP is: “Better few diamonds than tons of coal”.
- Abrams, A. (2014). Tesla Opens Its Patents to Everyone. Time Magazine.
- Baldus, O. (2010). Patent-Based Cooperation Effects. Journal of IP Law and Practice, 5, 111. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpp216
- Baldus, O., & Heckmann, C. (2011). Horizontal Patents, Commercial Benefit, and Sophisticated Patent Strategies. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 6, 401. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpr028
- Baldus, O., & Heckmann, C. (2012). Informal Restrictions and Evaluation of Patents. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 7, 613. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jps091
- Baldus, O., & Heckmann, C. (2016). Increasing Profits by Strategic Patenting—A Change of Perspective from Bottom-Up to Top-Down. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 6, 958. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2016.69093
- Baldus, O., & Heckmann, C. (2017). Lean IP-Management—Savings Costs for IP Management Based on a Paradigm Change in Assessing Inventions. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7, 760. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2017.76054
- Baldus, O., Barth, M., & Heckmann, C. (2019). Lean Applications for Lean IP Management. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14, 93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpy165
- Baldus, O., Dübon, P., & Barth, M. (2018). On the Value of Patents in Lean IP Management. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8, 1113. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2018.85077
- Bartenbach, K., & Volz, F.-E. (2014). Arbeitnehmererfindungsgesetz ArbEG (p. 952). Köln: Carl Heymanns.
- Barth, M., & Baldus, O. (2019). Managing Patent Portfolios—Lean IP Management versus Discount IP Management or Better Few Diamonds than Tons of Coal? American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 1901. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.910123
- Cooper, M. et al. (2020). Trump Signs $2 Trillion Bill as U.S. Virus Cases Pass 100,000. NY Times.
- Ensthaler, J., & Strübbe, K. (2006). Patentbewertung-Ein Praxisleitfaden zum Patentmanagement (p. 113). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
- Grünewald, T., & Wurzer, A. J. (2012). Monetäre Patentbewertung nach DIN 77100 (p. 81). Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
- Hayek, F. A. (1978). New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas (p. 149). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321288.001.0001