Policy Indications of International Experience for China’s Emergency Response Mechanism Construction
- 1 School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing, China
- 2 School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing, China
Abstract
The emergency management level is an important manifestation of the governance ability of a country. An effective emergency management mechanism can increase the speed of emergency response and minimize the damage of emergencies. In today’s world, public safety emergencies frequently occur. Developed countries such as the United States, Japan, Russia, France, etc., have developed emergency management capabilities to effectively deal with emergencies after years of accumulation of experience. This research explored the practice of the emergency management system, emergency management legal system, digital emergency management technology, emergency management concept and emergency culture construction of the countries in the world to provide effective support for China’s emergency management mechanism construction and related management decision-making. Based on the practical experience of developed countries, it is suggested that, first, the Chinese government should further strengthen the construction of emergency management mechanism; second, further improve the legal infrastructure of emergency management; third, accelerate the digital transformation of emergency management system; fourth, enhance emergency response to management philosophy and cultural construction.
- Bernstein, S. L., Aronsky, D., & Duseja R. (2009). The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Clinically Oriented Outcomes. Academic Emergency Medicine, 16, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x
- Chen, S. S. (2018). The Impact of Open Government Data on Emergency Management Practices in the United States. Library, No. 9, 39-43.
- Chu, J. W., & Chen, S. S. (2017). A Comparative Study on the Management Mechanism Innovation of the Chinese, American and Japanese Governments in Response to Emergencies under the Background of Big Data. Intelligence Theory and Practice, 40, 127-133.
- Comfort, L. K, Waugh, W. L., & Cigler, B. A. (2012). Emergency Management Research and Practice in Public Administration: Emergence, Evolution, Expansion, and Future Directions. Public Administration Review, 72, 539-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02549.x
- Du, C. Q., & Zhu, S. B. (2012). Research on Urban Public Safety Emergency Management Early Warning System Based on Technologies for the Internet of Things. Procedia Engineering, 45, 748-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.234
- Fan, B. J. (1998). Natural Disasters and Disaster Management in China. Heilongjiang Education Press.
- Gan, F. (1996). A Comparative Study of Crisis Management in Japan and the United States . Journal of Hangzhou University, No. 2, 12-16.
- Ge, K. K. (2013). The Era of Big Data: Great Changes in Life, Work and Thinking (pp. 140-142). Zhejiang People’s Publishing House.
- Kwan, M. P., & Lee, J. (2005). Emergency Response after 9/11: The Potential of Real-Time 3D GIS for Quick Emergency Response in Micro-Spatial Environments. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.08.002
- Li, H. W. (2003). Enlightenment of the United States Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Integrated Disaster Relief System for My Country’s Disaster Prevention and Rescue Work . Safety, Health and Environment, No. 11, 18-23.
- Liu, Y. N., & Luo, X. (2011). Japan’s Emergency Management Mechanism and Its Enlightenment to China: Taking the “March 11 Earthquake” as an Example. Journal of Beijing University of Astronautics (Social Science Edition), 24, 16-20.
- O’Keefe, S. (2007). Looking Back, Moving Forward. Public Administration Review, 67, 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00807.x