A High-Level Risk Management Framework as Part of an Overall Asset Management Process for the Assessment of Industry 4.0 and Its Corollary Industry 5.0 Related New Emerging Technological Risks in Socio-Technical Systems — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A High-Level Risk Management Framework as Part of an Overall Asset Management Process for the Assessment of Industry 4.0 and Its Corollary Industry 5.0 Related New Emerging Technological Risks in Socio-Technical Systems
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, Canada
,
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, Canada
,
Hydro-Quebec Research Institute, Varennes, Canada
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, Canada
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, Canada
3 Hydro-Quebec Research Institute, Varennes, Canada
Suffice to say that long-established businesses have their own challenges. Furthermore, accurate systematic methods and tools for managing risks in the context of industry 4.0 are lacking or less efficient, spreading unrealistic awareness of risk (or situational awareness) in various domains where risk management is needed. Conventional methods have their own limits and might not identify all aspects that influence system safety. Once traditional industry challenges are combined with emerging risks along with new systemic and organizational risks as well as cognitive and motivational biases in human logic, the re will be the necessity of building thorough Asset Management and Decision Support approaches accounting both for conventional and emerging risk safety management. Hence, innovative, and efficient approaches that can investigate issues from a broad systemic perspective to support asset management practitioners to deal with those threats associated with the complexity of socio-technical systems are of interest. On these grounds, this paper focuses on identifying and analyzing components of risk management approaches especially for new emerging safety risks within industry 4.0 (emerging technology-related risks), as well as the rising of extreme, rare, and disruptive events, at a time of continued uncertainty in the global economy, in conjunction with the highly insecure political situation caused by recent armed conflicts (for e.g., Russia vs Ukraine), and the coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19) that might create fatal disturbance of the performance of organizations. We opt for the relatively new methods that hav e been developed based on system theories, viz. the Functional Resonan ce Analysis Method (FRAM), the System-Theoretic Accident Model and Process es (STAMP, System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA)) and the global risk-informed decision-making approach (RIDM) in asset management as the best suited approach for this research. We first discuss the benefits of these methods then outline the possibility of combining them to conduct high-level risk management and decision-making framework. Further research would validate their efficiency and practicality. Therefore, future research initiatives will be devoted to conduct ing case studies in order to obtain more accurate data.
KeywordsAsset Management StrategyEnterprise Risk ManagementOccupational Safety and HealthResilience
Abdul-Nour, G., Gauthier, F., Diallo, I., Komljenovic, D., Vaillancourt, R., & Côté, A. (2021). Development of a Resilience Management Framework Adapted to Complex Asset Systems: Hydro-Québec Research Chair on Asset Management. In A. Crespo Márquez, D. Komljenovic, & J. Amadi-Echendu (Eds.), 14th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2019) (pp. 126-136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64228-0_12
Aguilera, M. V. C., da Fonseca, B. B., Ferris, T. K., Vidal, M. C. R., & de Carvalho, P. V. R. (2016). Modelling Performance Variabilities in Oil Spill Response to Improve System Resilience. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 41, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.02.018
Allison, C. K., Revell, K. M., Sears, R., & Stanton, N. A. (2017). Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Process (STAMP) Safety Modelling Applied to an Aircraft Rapid Decompression Event. Safety Science, 98, 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.011
Anish, S., & Gupta, A. (2010). Insights from Complexity Theory: Understanding Organizations Better. Indian Institute of Management. https://tejas.iimb.ac.in/articles/12.php?print=true
Anvarifar, F., Voorendt, M. Z., Zevenbergen, C., & Thissen, W. (2017). An Application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to Risk Analysis of Multifunctional Flood Defences in the Netherlands. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 158, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.004
Asset Management Council Melbourne (2014). Asset Management Body of Knowledge (AMBOK): Framework for Asset Management.
Baglee, D., Knowles, M., Kinnunen, S.-K., & Galar, D. (2016). A Proposed Maintenance Strategy for a Wind Turbine Gearbox Using Condition Monitoring Techniques. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 6, 386-403. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2016.077629
Bi, Z. (2017). Finite Element Analysis Applications: A Systematic and Practical Approach. Academic Press.
Blanchet, M., & Bergerried, R. (2014). Industrie 4.0-Les leviers de la transformation. http://www.gimelec.fr/Publications-Outils/Industrie-4.0-les-leviers-de-la-transformation
Boston-Consulting-Group (2020). Putting Industry 4.0 to Work. https://www.bcg.com/fr-ca/capabilities/operations/embracing-industry-4.0-rediscovering-growth
Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5—Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. The Publications Office of the European Union.
Industry 4.0
Risk-Informed Decision-Making
Functional Resonance Analysis Method
System-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes
British Standards Institution (2008). Asset Management: Specification for the Optimized Management of Physical Assets.
Brown, K., Laue, M., Tafur, J., Mahmood, M. N., Scherrer, P., & Keast, R. (2014). An Integrated Approach to Strategic Asset Management. In Gheorghe, A., M. Masera, & P. Katina (Eds.), Infranomics (pp. 57-74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02493-6_5
Bujor, A., & Gheorghe, R. (2010). Risk Informed Decision Making-Specific Aspects for Risk-Informing Decisions in a Regulatory Environment. Paper Presented at the European Safety and Reliability Annual Conference: Reliability, Risk and Safety: Back to the Future, ESREL 2010.
Business-20 (2019). B20 Tokyo Summit Joint Recommendations “Society 5.0 for SDGs”. Keidanren. http://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2019/020_Recommendations.pdf
Cabinet Office (2022). Society 5.0. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html
CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2013). Managing Emerging Technology-Related Risks (DIN CWA 16649 (DIN SPEC 91299): 2013-10).
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Conseil International des Grands Réseaux Électriques (2013). CIGRÉ: Asset Management Decision Making Using Different Risk Assessment Methodologies.
Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., & Tronci, M. (2018). Environmental Audit Improvements in Industrial Systems through FRAM. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51, 1155-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.434
De Carvalho, P. V. R. (2011). The Use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in a Mid-Air Collision to Understand Some Characteristics of the Air Traffic Management System Resilience. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96, 1482-1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.05.009
Dezfuli, H., Maggio, G., & Everett, C. (2010a). Risk-Informed Decision Making Application to Technology Development Alternative Selection. Paper Presented at the 4th IAASS Conference ‘Making Safety Matter’.
Dezfuli, H., Stamatelatos, M., Maggio, G., & Everett, C. (2010). Risk-Informed Decision Making in the Context of NASA Risk Management. 10th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management 2010, (p. 13). PSAM.
Dezfuli, H., Stamatelatos, M., Maggio, G., & Everett, C. (2010b). Risk-Informed Decision Making in the Context of NASA Risk Management. Paper Presented at the 10th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management 2010, PSAM 2010.
Dezfuli, H., Stamatelatos, M., Maggio, G., Everett, C., Youngblood, R., Rutledge, P. et al. (2010c). NASA Risk-Informed Decision Making Handbook. Books Express Publishing.
Diop, I., Abdul-Nour, G., & Komljenovic, D. (2022). The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: A Performance Appraisal Tool for Risk Assessment and Accident Investigation in Complex and Dynamic Socio-Technical Systems. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 195-230. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.122013
Diop, I., Georges, A., & Komljenovic, D. (2021). Overview of Strategic Approach to Asset Management and Decision-Making. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 10, 64-89.
Diop, I., Nadeau, S., & Emami-Mehrgani, B. (2019). A Mathematical Model: A Flexible Manufacturing System, Prone to Error, Making Two Products Each with Stochastic Demand Schedules. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 139-168. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2019.91011
Electrical Power Research-Institute (EPRI) (2002). Risk-Informed Asset Management (RIAM) Development Plan.
Erboz, G. (2017). How to Define Industry 4.0: The Main Pillars of Industry 4.0. Managerial Trends in the Development of Enterprises in Globalization Era (pp. 761-767). The Journal of Economic Literature.
European-Asset-Management-Committee (2017). Vers l’usine du futur—White Paper. EFICIO, l’efficience des CIO et l’efficacité des processus transformés. http://www.eficio.ca
Farmer, J. D. (2012). Economics Needs to Treat the Economy as a Complex System. Paper Presented at the Paper for the INET Conference ‘Rethinking Economics and Politics. The Journal of Economic Literature.
Ferjencik, M. (2011). An Integrated Approach to the Analysis of Incident Causes. Safety science, 49, 886-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.005
França, J. E. M., Hollnagel, E., dos Santos, I. J. A. L., & Haddad, A. N. (2020). FRAM AHP Approach to Analyse Offshore Oil Well Drilling and Construction Focused on Human Factors. Cognition, Technology & Work, 22, 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00594-z
Fu, G., Xie, X., Jia, Q., Li, Z., Chen, P., & Ge, Y. (2020). The Development History of Accident Causation Models in the Past 100 Years: 24Model, a More Modern Accident Causation Model. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 134, 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.027
Gaha, M., Chabane, B., Komljenovic, D., Côté, A., Hébert, C., Blancke, O. et al. (2021). Global Methodology for Electrical Utilities Maintenance Assessment Based on Risk-Informed Decision Making. Sustainability, 3, Article No. 9091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169091
Gao, Y., Fan, Y., Wang, J., & Duan, Z. (2019). Evaluation of Governmental Safety Regulatory Functions in Preventing Major Accidents in China. Safety Science, 120, 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.002
GFMAM (Global-Forum-on-Maintenance and Asset-Management) (2014). The Asset Management Landscape. http://www.gfmam.org
Heinrich, H. W., Peterson, D., & Roos, W. (1980). Industrial Accident Prevention (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill book Company, Inc.
Herrera, I. A., & Woltjer, R. (2010). Comparing a Multi-Linear (STEP) and Systemic (FRAM) Method for Accident Analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95, 1269-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.003
Hickford, A. J., Blainey, S. P., Hortelano, A. O., & Pant, R. (2018). Resilience Engineering: Theory and Practice in Interdependent Infrastructure Systems. Environment Systems and Decisions, 38, 278-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.003
Hollnagel, E. (2004). Barriers and Accident Prevention. Ashgate.
Hollnagel, E. (2012). FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-Technical Systems. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Hollnagel, E. (2013). Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Hollnagel, E. (2014). Safety-I and Safety-II. The Past and Future of Safety Management. Ashgate.
Hollnagel, E. (2016). A FRAM Glossary. https://www.functionalresonance.com/
Hollnagel, E. (2018). Safety-I and safety-II: the Past and Future of Safety Management. CRC Press.
Hollnagel, E., & Speziali, J. (2008b). Study on Developments in Accident Investigation Methods: A Survey of the ‘State-of-the-Art’. Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/945469
Hollnagel, E., Pruchnicki, Shawn, Woltjer, Rogier, & Etcher, Shawn. (2008a). Analysis of Comair Flight 5191 with the Functional Resonance Accident Model. Paper Presented at the 8th International Symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association.
Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (2012). Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Hounsgaard, J. (2016). Patient Safety in Everyday Work: Learning from Things That Go Right. Syddansk Universitet.
Huang, W., Yin, D., Xu, Y., Zhang, R., & Xu, M. (2022). Using N-K Model to Quantitatively Calculate the Variability in Functional Resonance Analysis Method. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 217, Article ID: 108058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108058
IAM (Institute-of-Asset-Management) (2015). Asset Management—An Anatomy V3. Institute of Asset Management. https://theiam.org/media/1781/iam_anatomy_ver3_web.pdf
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2009). ISO GUIDE 73:2009 Risk Management—Vocabulary (p. 15). Technical Committee: ISO/TMBG Technical Management Board-Groups.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2014). ISO-55000: Asset management—Overview, Principles and Terminology (p. 19). Technical Committee: ISO/TC 251, Asset Management, International Organization for Standardization.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2018a). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management—Guidelines (p. 16). Technical Committee: ISO/TC 262 Risk Management. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2018b). ISO 31050 Guidance for Managing Emerging Risks to Enhance Resilience. Work Group 8 (WG8) of the Technical Committee TC262, International Organization for Standardization.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2019). ISO-55010: A Guidance on the Alignment of Financial and Non-Financial Functions in Asset Management. (p. 40). Technical Committee : ISO/TC 251 Asset Management, Asset Management, International Organization for Standardization.
Kagermann, H., Lukas, W.-D., & Wahlster, W. (2011). Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution. VDI nachrichten, 13, 2-3.
Katina, Polinpapilinho F, Pyne, James C, Keating, Charles B, & Komljenovic, D. (2021). Complex System Governance as a Framework for Asset Management. Sustainability, 13, Article No. 8502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158502
Keating, C. B., Katina, P. F., Chesterman, C. W., & Pyne, J. C. (2022). Future Challenges for Complex System Governance Research and Practice. In C. B. Keating, P. F. Katina, C. W. Chesterman Jr., & J. C. Pyne (Eds.), Complex System Governance (pp. 541-575). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93852-9_17
Khuntia, S. R., Rueda, J. L., Bouwman, S., & van der Meijden, M. A. M. M. (2016). A Literature Survey on Asset Management in Electrical Power [Transmission and Distribution] System. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 26, 2123-2133. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.2193
Klim, Z, Balazinski, M., & Komljenovic, D. (2011). Probabilistic Approach Limitations in the Analysis of Safety Critical Systems. In M. Singh, R. B. K. N. Rao, & P. Liyanage (Eds.), Proceedings of 24th International Congress on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics Engineering Management (p. 10). COMADEM International.
Komljenovic, D. (2018). Prise de décision en gestion des actifs industriels en tenant compte des risques. Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.
Komljenovic, D. (2021). Engineering Asset Management at Times of Major, Large-Scale Instabilities and Disruptions. In A. Crespo Márquez, D. Komljenovic, & J. Amadi-Echendu (Eds.), Proceedings of 14th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (pp. 255-270). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64228-0_22
Komljenovic, D., Gaha, M., Abdul-Nour, G., Langheit, C., & Bourgeois, M. (2016). Risks of Extreme and Rare Events in Asset Management. Safety Science, 88, 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.05.004
Kozak, M. W. (2017). Safety Assessment for Near-Surface Disposal of Low and Intermediate Level Wastes. In M. J. Apted, & J. Ahn (Eds.), Geological Repository Systems for Safe Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuels and Radioactive Waste (pp. 475-498). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100642-9.00016-5
Kumar, U., & Ellingsen, H. P. (2000). Design and Development of Maintenance Performance Indicators for the Norwegian Oil and Gas Industry. Proceedings of the 15th European Maintenance Congress: Euromaintenance 2000. (pp. 224-228). The Swedish Maintenance Society (UTEK) and The European Federation of National Maintenance Societies (EFNMS).
Leveson, N. (2004). A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems. Safety Science, 42, 237-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
Leveson, N. G. (2016). Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. The MIT Press.
Leveson, N. G. (2018). Safety Analysis in Early Concept Development and Requirements Generation. INCOSE International Symposium, 28, 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2018.00492.x
Lyubarskiy, A., Kuzmina, I., & El-Shanawany, M. (2011). Advances in Risk Informed Decision Making–IAEA’s Approach. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Nordic PSA Conference.
Mahajan, H. S., Bradley, T., & Pasricha, S. (2017). Application of Systems Theoretic Process Analysis to a Lane Keeping Assist System. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 167, 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.037
Miller, J. H., & Page, S. (2009). Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835522
Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Ten Principles of Complexity and Enabling Infrastructures (Vol. 1). Elsevier.
Müller, J. (2020). Enabling Technologies for Industry 5.0 (pp. 8-10). European Commission.
Onday, O. (2019). Japan’s Society 5.0: Going beyond Industry 4.0. Business and Economics Journal, 10, Article No. 389.
Ouyang, M., Hong, L., Yu, M.-H., & Fei, Q. (2010). STAMP-Based Analysis on the Railway Accident and Accident Spreading: Taking the China-Jiaoji Railway Accident for Example. Safety Science, 48, 544-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.002
Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Ashgate Published Limited.
Rosa, L. V., Haddad, A. N., & de Carvalho, P. V. R. (2015). Assessing Risk in Sustainable Construction Using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM). Cognition, Technology and Work, 17, 559-573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0337-z
Roshani, E., & Filion, Y. R. (2014). Event-Based Approach to Optimize the Timing of Water Main Rehabilitation with Asset Management Strategies. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140, Article ID: 04014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000392
Salmon, P. M., Cornelissen, M., & Trotter, M. J. (2012). Systems-Based Accident Analysis Methods: A Comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP. Safety Science, 50, 1158-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.009
Slater, D., Hollnagel, E., MacKinnon, R., Sujan, M., Carson-Stevens, A., Ross, A. et al. (2022). A Systems Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response in the United Kingdom—Part 1: The overall Context. Safety Science, 146, Article ID: 105525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105525
Sun, L., Li, Y.-F., & Zio, E. (2022). Comparison of the HAZOP, FMEA, FRAM, and STPA Methods for the Hazard Analysis of Automatic Emergency Brake Systems. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 8, Article ID: 231104. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051940
Thapaliya, A., & Kwon, G. (2018). Realization of Combined Systemic Safety Analysis of Adverse Train Control System Using Model Checking. In J. Hung, N. Yen, & L. Hui (Eds.), Frontier Computing: Theory, Technologies and Applications (pp. 419-430). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3648-5_49
Travers, W. D. (1999). Staff Requirements—SECY-98-14—White Paper on Risk-Informed and Performance-Based Regulation. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0037/ML003753601.pdf
Underwood, P., & Waterson, P. (2013). Accident Analysis Models and Methods: Guidance for Safety Professionals. Loughborough University.
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2002). Regulatory Guide, 1, 174, Rev. 1: An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
WEC (World Energy Concil) (2022). Dynamic Resilience Framework. https://www.worldenergy.org/transition-toolkit/dynamic-resilience-framework
Woods, D. D. (2015). Four Concepts for Resilience and the Implications for the Future of Resilience Engineering. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 141, 5-9.
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, Conception and Perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018
Zio, E., & Pedroni, N. (2012). Overview of Risk-Informed Decision-Making Processes. FonCSI. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006