Ranking of Greenhouse Vegetable Suppliers across Three Canadian Provinces Using Data Envelopment Analysis with Multiple Inputs and Outputs
- 1 Department of Quantitative Studies, University Canada West, Vancouver, Canada
- 2 Department of Quantitative Studies, University Canada West, Vancouver, Canada
Abstract
This study explores the application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a tool for evaluating the operational efficiency of agricultural operations in Canada under varying conditions. While traditional DEA models are designed for precise input-output data, they may not adequately address uncertainties present in real-world scenarios. This research extends the conventional DEA framework to accommodate multiple scenarios, specifically assessing greenhouse, sod, and nursery operations in British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec from 2019 to 2023. Utilizing a modified DEA model that remains linear and computationally efficient, this study evaluates efficiency based on various input and output metrics, including operational expenses and product value. Findings indicate that Quebec achieved full operational efficiency consistently, whereas Ontario and British Columbia showed improvement over time but did not match Quebec’s performance. Introducing a multi-scenario approach enhances the robustness of efficiency analysis in agricultural contexts. However, the study notes certain limitations, such as the static nature of the analysis and the exclusion of qualitative factors.
- Alimohammadi Ardekani, M. et al. (2016). A Robust Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Measuring Efficiency: Considering Iranian Electricity Power Production and Distribution Processes. International Journal o f Engineering, 29, 646-653.
- Chapman, S. N., & Carter, P. L. (1990). Supplier/Customer Inventory Relationships under Just-in-Time. Decision Sciences , 21, 35-51.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System . https://hbr.org/1998/07/putting-the-enterprise-into-the-enterprise-system
- Dickson, G. (1966). An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions. Journal of Purchasing , 2, 28-41.
- Government of Canada, Statistics Canada. (2024, April 25). Specialized Greenhouse Producers’ Operating Expenses. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3210002501
- Jahanshahloo, G. H. R., & Zahedi-Seresht, M. (2015). Utilizing the Monte Carlo Method for Ranking Extremely Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of New Research in Mathematics, 1, 23-40.
- Kleinsorge, I. K., Schary, P. B., & Tanner, R. D. (1992). Data Envelopment Analysis for Monitoring Customer Supplier Relationships. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy , 11, 357-372.
- Li, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2012). DEA Efficiency Evaluation of the Chinese Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Production Resea rch , 168 , 2.
- Liu, S., Luo, L., & Zhu, Q. (2012). Development of Data Envelopment Analysis for the Performance Evaluation of Green Supply Chain with Undesirable Outputs. International Journal of System s Science , 3 , 1.
- Monczka, R. M., Giunipero, L. C., & Reck, R. F. (1981). Perceived Importance of Supplier Information. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 17, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.1981.tb00629.x
- Moriarity, R. T. (1983). Industrial Buying Behavior. Lexington Books.
- Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., & Mendez, D. (2001). Supplier Evaluation and Rationalization via Data Envelopment Analysis: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2001.tb00103.x