Hub Port Cooperation vs Competition: A Multi-Criteria Approach for Cost, Reliability, and Sustainability in Liner Shipping
- 1 Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
- 2 Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
Abstract
Efficient logistical services are usually reliable, i.e., they are available when required. However, reliable logistics service is normally inversely proportional to unreliability, implying a cost-tradeoff. Moreover, containerized liner shipping, in particular, relies heavily on port infrastructures and their managerial decision. This paper examines how cooperative vs. competitive strategies between hub ports can affect the design of a logistical network that is cost-effective and reliable. A multi-objective mixed integer nonlinear optimization model is proposed. Numerical experiments were conducted within the West Africa-Europe-South America transatlantic supply chain, focusing on West Africa due to its strategic location (Atlantic shipping crossroads and extensive coastline). The results show that cooperative hubs, whether close or far apart, exhibit a complex interplay between absolute cost performance and marginal efficiency. While hubs nearby achieved superior marginal cost tradeoffs, neither closer nor geographically distant cooperative hubs dominated each other in absolute cost performance. However, the results showcased that competition completely dominates cooperation when hubs are located far apart.
- Africa Container Shipping (2022). The Main Candidates to Become the Number 1 Regional Hub in West Africa . https://africa-container-shipping.com/en/top-10-ports-africa-port-projects-in-west-africa/
- African Development Bank Group (2015). The Lomé Container Terminal . https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/document/project-brief-the-lome-container-terminal-83648
- Blanchard, B. S. (2014). Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability Measures. In B. S. Blanchard, (Ed.), Logistics Engineering and Management (p. 54). Pearson Education Limited.
- Correia, P., & Chengji, L. (2024). Forward Sustainable Transportation Network: Inter-hub and Spoke Versus Multi-Gateway Port Model. Social Science Research Network . http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4768446
- Dulebenets, M. A. (2018). A Comprehensive Multi-Objective Optimization Model for the Vessel Scheduling Problem in Liner Shipping. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 293-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.027
- Dyck, G. K., & Ismael, H. M. (2015). Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Port Competitiveness in West Africa Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5, 432-446. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2015.56043
- Elmi, Z., Li, B., Liang, B., Lau, Y., Borowska-Stefańska, M., Wiśniewski, S., et al. (2023). An Epsilon-Constraint-Based Exact Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for the Ship Schedule Recovery Problem in Liner Shipping. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 183, Article 109472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109472
- Kherallah, H. (2020). DP World and Senegal Sign Agreement to Develop Ndayane Port . https://www.dpworld.com/news/releases/dp-world-and-senegal-sign-agreement-to-develop-ndayane-port/
- Kim, H., Lam, J. S. L., & Lee, P. T. (2018). Analysis of Liner Shipping Networks and Transshipment Flows of Potential Hub Ports in Sub-Saharan Africa. Transport Policy, 69, 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.018
- Koza, D. F. (2019). Liner Shipping Service Scheduling and Cargo Allocation. European Journal of Operational Research, 275, 897-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.011
- Lezhnina, E. A., & Balykina, Y. E. (2021). Cooperation between Sea Ports and Carriers in the Logistics Chain. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9, Article 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9070774
- Li, J., & Oh, Y. (2010). A Research on Competition and Cooperation between Shanghai Port and Ningbo-Zhoushan Port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 26, 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2092-5212(10)80012-4