Fiscal Decentralization, Revenue Independence and Technical Efficiency of County Governments in Kenya
- 1 Department of Applied Economics, School of Business, Economics and Tourism, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
- 2 School of Business, Economics and Humanities, Mama Ngina University College, Gatundu, Kenya
- 3 Department of Economic Theory, School of Business, Economics and Tourism, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
Abstract
Since independence, Kenya has implemented various programmes for fiscal decentralization and revenue independence to enhance technical efficiency in public service delivery. The 2010 Constitution emphasized fiscal devolution as a vital driver of economic growth by lowering costs, promoting transparency, and improving allocative efficiency. As county funding increases, technical efficiency is expected to improve as more resources are allocated to smaller government units. However, despite increased allocations and greater independence through tax powers, there is no clear evidence of improved efficiency, with no significant gains in health and agricultural services and a decline in county GDP over time. Revenue collections remain low and declining despite higher targets. The study aimed to assess how fiscal decentralization and revenue independence influence fiscal efficiency, using a Tobit Model to identify the factors that affect it. Findings indicate that fiscal decentralization only boosts efficiency beyond a threshold of Ksh. 512.8 billion annually; below this, increased funds diminish efficiency, while above it, efficiency improves by 8% for each 1% rise in funds. Revenue independence, however, negatively affects efficiency. The study recommends gradually increasing devolved funding towards the threshold or re-evaluating devolution structures if targets are unattainable, and reforming revenue assignment to improve own-source revenue capacity.
- Adam Smith International (2016). Annual Review of Strengthening Executive Government . https://adamsmithinternational.com/project-list/page/11/?order=desc
- Andrés, R., Tijmstra, S. A. R., & Bwire, A. (2009). Fiscal Decentralization, Efficiency, and Growth. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2041-2062.
- Bahl, R. W. (1992). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Developing Countries: Principles and Practice , Urban and Local Government Background Series No. 2 . World Bank.
- Blöchliger, H., & Petzold, O. (2009). Taxes or Grants: What Revenue Source for Sub-Central Governments? OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 706 . OECD Publishing.
- Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution . Cambridge University Press.
- Development Initiatives (2018). Strengthening Subnational Government Own-Source Revenue Mobilisation in Kenya . Development Initiatives Poverty Research Ltd.
- GoK (2000). Water Supply and Sanitation in Kenya. Turning Finance into Services for 2015 and beyond. Kenya Country Status Overview . World Bank.
- Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 35, 519-530.
- McLure, J. (2017). The Power of Collaboration. CSA News, 62, 17.
- Muriu, R. A. (2013). Decentralization, Citizen Participation, and Local Public Service Delivery: A Study on the Nature and Influence of Citizen Participation on Decentralized Service Delivery in Kenya. Schriftenreihe für Public and Nonprofit Management, No. 17, Universitätsverlag Potsda m . http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-65085
- Musgrave, A. R. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance . McGraw Hill Book Company.
- Mwiathi, S., Wawire, W., & Onono, P. (2018). The Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on Poverty Reduction in Kenya . International Educative Research Foundation and Publisher.
- Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism . Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Robalino, D. O., Picazo, F., & Voetberg, A. (2002). Does Fiscal Decentralization Improve Health Outcomes? Evidence from Cross-Country Analysis. Policy Research Working Paper No. 2565 . World Bank.
- Special Rural Development Program (1972). The Second Overall Evaluation of the Special Rural Development Programme. Agricultural Administration , 3, 217-233.