Are Rational Self-Interested Leadership Behaviors Contributing to the Workplace Bullying Phenomenon in Canada and the United States?
- 1 Goodman School of Business, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada
- 2
- 3
- 4
Abstract
Workplace bullying is a phenomenon in American and Canadian organizations that has been ignored for many years and as a result targeted employees are suffering [1-3]. Workplace bullying is at epidemic proportions with little done to address the issue. The workplace for bullied employees has become an uncivilized and hostile environment [4]. Leaders who embrace a rational self-interested approach to leading are contributing to the workplace bullying phenomenon. Using Chi Square tests of independence, the study was conducted to determine the extent to which rational self-interested leaders rely on bullying behaviors when interacting with employees. Three hundred fifty-five employees were asked to complete a survey consisting of fifteen bullying behavior statements. The results of the Chi Square tests indicate a significant relationship exists between employee demographics vs. certain bullying behaviors associated with threats to personal standing, professional status and destabilization. The results further reveal that rational self-interested leaders are relying on bullying in three areas: threat to personal standing, threat to professional status and destabilization. It was also noted that if the rational self-interest leader did not make changes the problem of workplace bullying would continue to escalate. The recommendation was that rational self-interested leaders could benefit by changing their perspective on employees to include more personal and humane treatment, rewards, and recognition.
- L. M. S. Barrow, “In Darkness Light Dawns: Exposing Workplace Bullying,” Purple Crown Publishing, Port Colborne, 2009
- N. Djurkovic, D. McCormack, and G. Casimir, “The Behavioral Reactions of Victims to Different Types of Workplace Bullying,” International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2005, pp. 439-460.
- G. Namie and R. Namie, “The Bully at Work,” 2nd Edition, Sourcebooks, Naperville, 2009.
- F. Bulutlar and E. U. oz, “The Effects of Ethical Climates on Bullying Behaviour in the Workplace,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 86, No. 3, 2009, pp. 273-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9847-4
- O. B. Ayoko, V. J. Callan and C. J. Hartel, “Workplace, Conflict, Bullying, and Counterproductive Behavior,” International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2003, pp. 283-301.
- Workplace Bullying Institute & Zogby International, 2007. http://www.workplacebullying.org/research/WBI-Zogby2007Survey.html
- L. M. S. Barrow and J. Mirabella, “An Empirical Study of Other-Oriented and Rational Self-Interested Leadership Approaches,” Journal of Leadership Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2009, pp. 44-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jls.20107
- B. M. Meglino and M. A. Korsgaard, “Considering the Rational Self-Interest as a Disposition: Organizational Implications of Other Orientation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 6, 2004, pp. 946-959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.946
- B. M. Meglino and M. A. Korsgaard, “The Role of Other Orientation in Reactions to Job Characteristics,” Journal of Management, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2007, pp. 57-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206306295308
- S. Boerner, S. Eisenbeiss and D. Griesser, “Follower Behavior and Organizational Performance: The Impact of Transformational Leaders,” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2007, pp. 15-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130030201
- P. Northouse, “Leadership: Theory and Practice,” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007
- B. Bass and D. Steidlmeier, “Ethics, Character and Authentic Transformational Leadership Behavior,” Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1999, pp. 181-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00016-8
- J. Humphreys, “Transformational and Transactional Leader Behavior,” Journal of Management Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2001, pp. 149-159.