Introduction of Innovative Equipment in Mining: Impact on Productivity
- 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, école de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Canada
- 2 Department of Management, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
- 3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, école de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Canada
- 4 Department of Automated Production Engineering, école de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Canada
Abstract
In this era of increased competition and rapid change, mining companies must remain attentive to all opportunities to gain an advantage over competitors. Acquisition of innovative equipment is often viewed as a way of decreasing operating costs, for example , by increasing machinery reliability. The objective of this paper is to examine the impact of new equipment on productivity in underground mining. Ten projects were examined using three indicators: the cost per meter drilled, the cost per hour of use and the equipment availability ratio. The results clearly show that the introduction of new equipment with technological innovations does not necessarily improve productivity. In some cases, performance indicators even dropped. We suggest that future research should focus on identifying the mechanisms and conditions that ensure the increases in productivity following the introduction of the latest innovations in mining equipment. Successful introductions of such equipment likely depend on the conditions surrounding it.
- R. Bullock, “Trends in Non-Coal Underground Mining Technology at the Close of the Millennium,” Proceedings of the American-Polish Mining Symposium, Las Vegas, 8 October 2000, pp. 127-144.
- S. Planeta and J. Paraszczak, “Underground Metalliferous Mining in Canada: Methods and Costs,” Proceedings of the American-Polish Mining Symposium, Las Vegas, 8 October 2000, pp. 106-116.
- K. Nielsen and H. Gether, “Innovation as a Contribution to Sustainable Development. A Status Assessment of the Mineral Industry,” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advances in Mineral Resources Management and Environmental Geotechnology (AMIREG), Hania, Greece, 7-9 June 2004, pp. 329-334.
- G. Upstill and P. Hall, “Innovation in the Minerals Industry: Australia in a Global Context,” Resources Policy, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 137-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2006.12.002
- P. Bartos, “Is Mining a High-Tech Industry? Investigations into Innovation and Productivity Advance,” Resources Policy, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2007, pp. 149-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.07.001
- T. Horberry, R. Burgess-Limerick and L. Steiner, “Human Factors for the Design, Operation, and Mainenance of Mining Equipment,” CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011.
- B. Trudel, S. Nadeau, K. Zaras and I. Deschamps, “Key Factors for a Successful Introduction of Mining Innovation,”Congrès de l’AQHSST, Bromont, 1-3 May 2013.
- J. Chadwick, “Moving Ore Efficiently,” International Mining, 2008, pp. 38-46.
- D. Lynas and T. Horberry, “Human Factor Issues with Automated Mining Equipment,” The Ergonomics Open Journal, Vol. 4, 2011, pp. 74-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1875934301104010074
- M. Karmis, “Mine Health and Safety Management,” Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Littleton, 2001.
- V. Kecojivic, D. Komljenovic, W. Groves and M. Rodomsky, “An Analysis of Equipment-Related Fatal Accidents in U.S. Mining Operations: 1995-2005,” Safety Science, Vol. 45, No. 8, 2007, pp. 864-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.024
- S. Ural and S. Demirkol, “Evaluation of Occupational Safety and Health in Surfaces Mines,” Safety Science, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1016-1024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.11.010
- B. S. Dhillon, “Mine Safety: A Modern Approach,” Springer, London, 2010.
- J. Patterson and S. Shappell, “Operator Error and System Deficiencies: Analysis of 508 Mining Incidents and Accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1379-1385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.018