The Effect of China’s Public R & D Policy on R & D Expenditure of Enterprises
- 1 College of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
Whether public R & D expenditures are complementary or crowding out of R & D expenditures in the enterprise, there is no consensus in the academic community. This paper constructs a dynamic panel data model, uses the system GMM to estimate, and examines the impact of Chinese government R & D funding on corporate R & D expenditures at the macro level, concluded as follow: When endogenous issues are not considered, the estimated result is that government R & D funding will increase R & D expenditures for enterprises, and considering endogenous issues, government R & D funding will squeeze out R & D expenditures. The government’s R & D funding for scientific research institutions has had a significant negative impact, and the government’s R & D funding for institutions of higher learning will boost the R & D investment of companies. According to the current distribution of government R & D funding, the impact of government R & D funding on corporate R & D expenditure is 0.3276; the impact of government R & D funding on self-raised R & D funds is -0.038. It can be seen that according to the current distribution of government R & D funding, the effect of government R & D funding is crowding out.
- Shrieves, R.E. (1978) Market Structure and Innovation: A New Perspective. Journal of Industrial Economics, 26, 329-347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098078
- Carmichael, J. (1981) The Effects of Mission-Oriented Public R & D Spending on Private Industry. Journal of Finance, 36, 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb00648.x
- Higgins, R.S. and Link, A.N. (1981) Federal Support of Technological Growth in Industry: Some Evidence of Crowding out. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28, 86-88. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1981.6447450
- David, P.A., Hall, B.H. and Toole, A.A. (2000) Is Public R & D a Complement or Substitute for Private R & D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
- Diamond, A.M. (1999) Does Federal Funding “Crowd in” Private Funding of Science. Contemporary Economic Policy, 17, 423-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1999.tb00694.x
- Duguet, E. (2004) Are R & D Subsidies a Substitute or a Complement to Privately Funded R & D? Evidence from France Using Propensity Score Methods for Non-Experimental Data. Revue D’Economie Politique, 114, 263-292. https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.142.0245
- González, X. and Pazó, C. (2008) Do Public Subsidies Stimulate Private R & D Spending? Research Policy, 37, 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009
- Bérubé, C. and Mohnen, P. (2009) Are Firms That Receive R & D Subsidies More Innovative? Canadian Journal of Economics, 42, 206-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01505.x
- Aschhoff, B. (2009) The Effect of Subsidies on R & D Investment and Success. Do Subsidy History and Size Matter? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 032, Mannheim.
- Carboni, O.A. (2011) R & D Subsidies and Private R & D Expenditures: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Data. International Review of Applied Economics, 25, 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2010.529427
- Czarnitzki, D., Hottenrott, H. and Thorwarth, S. (2011) Industrial Research versus Development Investment: The Implications of Financial Constraints. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beq038
- Henningsen, M., Haegeland, T. and Møen, J. (2012) Estimating the Additionality of R & D Subsidies Using Proposal Evaluation Data to Control for Firms’ R & D Intentions. Statistics Norway Discussion Paper, 729.