On Indicators Oecd Proposes for Gauging Science & Technology
- 1 CNR-IRCRES, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Ricerca sulla Crescita Economica Sostenibile, via dei Taurini, Roma, Italy
Abstract
The great number of theories of technological change witnesses a difficulty in devising and performing the crucial experiments which would allow a rational choice among alternative explanations. A preliminary step of the methodological process that must be completed to overcome such difficulty is the construction of consistent taxonomies of the S&T Indicators available to test current theories. By rationally defining sound criteria for the measurement of S&T activities, a well-founded taxonomy like that will provide scholars with clearer and better analytical instruments for theoretical discussion. As a consequence, the empirical investigation, which always ought to be closely linked with theory, could improve as well.
- Godin, B. (2004) Measurement and Statistics on Science and Technology: 1920 to the Present. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481523
- De Marchi, M. (2016) A Taxonomy of S&T Indicators, Scientometrics, 106, 1265-1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1823-z
- Popper, K.R. (1992) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, London.
- Oecd (2015) Frascati Manual (Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development). Paris.
- Oecd (2018) Oslo Manual (The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities). Paris.