Case Study for Undetermined Mosquito Species by Polymerase Chain Reaction in Western Burkina Faso
- 1 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique CNRST, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante (IRSS), Laboratoire de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses et parasitaires, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
- 2 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique CNRST, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante (IRSS), Laboratoire de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses et parasitaires, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
- 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique CNRST, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante (IRSS), Laboratoire de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses et parasitaires, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
- 4 Institut des Sciences et Techniques (INSTech Bobo), Avenue de Sya, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
- 5 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique CNRST, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante (IRSS), Laboratoire de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses et parasitaires, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
- 6 Institut des Sciences et Techniques (INSTech Bobo), Avenue de Sya, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
Abstract
Introduction: Malaria eradication campaigns all over the world are largely based on parasite and vector control. Vector identification, whether morphological or molecular, is an essential component of vector control. This study analyzed the possible causes of indeterminate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results for mosquito species in Western part of Burkina Faso. Methodology: From July 2021 to November 2021, mosquitoes were collected during the period of high malaria transmission in the village of Séguéré, Houet province, Burkina Faso, and morphologically identified. After DNA extraction, samples were amplified by sine 200× PCR to identify species of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Indeterminate samples were then selected for further analysis. The parameters studied were: DNA dilution, the effect of protocol adjusting, and the type of protocol used. Results: A total of 130 “indeterminate” DNAs diluted 1:10 were analyzed. After dilution, the mean amount was 14.73 ± 3.59 ng/μL and absorbance 1.71 ± 0.1. PCR chain reaction yielded 94.62% (123/130) anopheline species in SINE PCR, 5.38% (7/130) “negative”. A significant difference between SINE PCR before dilution and after dilution was observed ( P < 0.001). Identification tests carried out using other protocols gave no positive results. From these results, we note that the adaptation of the protocol significantly reduced the polymerase amplification results of the species. Conclusion: It is therefore necessary to respect the amplification protocols. However, the persistence of “indeterminate” results suggests that further studies should be carried out to shed more light on the subject.
- Sumruayphol, S., et al. (2020) Seasonal Dynamics and Molecular Differentiation of Three Natural Anopheles Species (Diptera: Culicidae) of the Maculatus Group (Neocellia Series) in Malaria Hotspot Villages of Thailand. Parasites and Vectors, 13, Article No. 574. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04452-0
- Riehle, M.M., Guelbeogo, W.M., Gneme, A., Eiglmeier, K., Holm, I., Bischoff, E., et al. (2011) A Cryptic Subgroup of Anopheles gambiae Is Highly Susceptible to Human Malaria Parasites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 15037-15042.
- Service, M. (2012) Medical Entomology for Students. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139002967
- Hay, S.I., et al. (2010) Developing Global Maps of the Dominant Anopheles Vectors of Human Malaria. PLOS Medicine, 7, e1000209.
- Coetzee, M., Hunt, R.H., Wilkerson, R., Della Torre, A., Coulibaly, M.B. and Besansky, N.J. (2013) Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles amharicus, New Members of the Anopheles gambiae Complex. Zootaxa, 3619, 246-274. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3619.3.2
- Plewes, K., Leopold, S.J., Kingston, H.W.F. and Dondorp, A.M. (2019) Malaria: What’s New in the Management of Malaria? Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 33, 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2018.10.002
- OMS (2022) Rapport Paludisme 2022. Geneva.
- Carnevale, P. and Robert, V. (2009) Les Anophèles, IRD Edition, IRD, Marseille. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.10374
- Nkya, T.E., Fillinger, U., Sangoro, O.P., Marubu, R., Chanda, E. and Mutero, C.M. (2022) Six Decades of Malaria Vector Control in Southern Africa: A Review of the Entomological Evidence-Base. Malaria Journal, 21, Article No. 279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04292-6
- Cohuet, A., Simard, F., Toto, J.C., Kengne, P., Coetzee, M. and Fontenille, D. (2003) Species Identification within the Anopheles funestus Group of Malaria Vectors in Cameroon and Evidence for a New Species. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 69, 200-205. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.200
- Coluzzi, M., Sabatini, A., Della Torre, A., Di Deco, M.A. and Petrarca, V. (2002) A Polytene Chromosome Analysis of the Anopheles gambiae Species Complex. Science (80-.), 298, 1415-1418. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1077769
- Dabiré, K.R., et al. (2009) Distribution of Insensitive Acetylcholinesterase (ace-1R) in Anopheles gambiae s. l. Populations from Burkina Faso (West Africa). Tropical Medicine & International Health, 14, 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02243.x