The Potential of DNA Barcode-Based Delineation Using Seven Putative Candidate Loci of the Plastid Region in Inferring Molecular Diversity of Cowpea at Sub-Species Level — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Potential of DNA Barcode-Based Delineation Using Seven Putative Candidate Loci of the Plastid Region in Inferring Molecular Diversity of Cowpea at Sub-Species Level
Department of Zoology, School of Physical and Biological Sciences, Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya
,
Department of Biological Sciences, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
,
Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya
,
Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
,
Department of Biological Sciences, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
,
Department of Zoology, School of Physical and Biological Sciences, Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya
1 Department of Zoology, School of Physical and Biological Sciences, Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
3 Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya
4 Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
5 Department of Biological Sciences, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
6 Department of Zoology, School of Physical and Biological Sciences, Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya
The novelty and suitability of the mitochondrial gene CO 1 in DNA barcoding as a reliable identification tool in animal species are undisputed. This is attributed to its standardized sequencing segment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase-1 gene ( CO 1) which has the necessary universality and variability making it a generally acceptable barcode region. CO 1 is a haploid single locus that is uniparentally-inherited. Protein-coding regions are present in high-copy numbers making it an ideal barcode. The mitochondrial oxidase subunit I (COI) gene is a robust barcode with a suitable threshold for delineating animals and is not subject to drastic length variation, frequent mononucleotide repeats or microinversions. However, a low nucleotide substitution rate of plant mitochondrial genome [mtDNA] precludes the use of CO 1 as a universal plant DNA barcode and makes the search for alternative barcode regions necessary. Currently, there exists no universal barcode for plants. The plastid region reveals leading candidate loci as appropriate DNA barcodes yet to be explored in biodiversity studies in Kenya. Four of these plastid regions are portions of coding genes ( matK, rbcL, rpoB , and rpoC 1), and three noncoding spacers ( atpF-atpH, trnH-psbA , and psbK-psbL ) which emerge as ideal candidate DNA loci. While different research groups propose various combinations of these loci, there exists no consensus; the lack thereof impedes progress in getting a suitable universal DNA barcode. Little research has attempted to investigate and document the applicability and extend of effectiveness of different DNA regions as barcodes to delineate cowpea at subspecies level. In this study we sought to test feasibility of the seven putative candidate DNA loci singly and in combination in order to establish a suitable single and multi-locus barcode regions that can have universal application in delineating diverse phylogeographic groups of closely related Kenyan cowpea variants. In this study, our focus was based on genetic parameters including analyses of intra- and infra-specific genetic divergence based on intra- and infra-specific K2P distances; calculation of Wilcoxon signed rank tests of intra-specific divergence among loci and coalescence analyses to delineate independent genetic clusters. Knowledge of DNA candidate loci that are informative will reveal the suitability of DNA barcoding as a tool in biodiversity studies. Results of this study indicate that: matK, trnH-psbA, psbK-psbL , and rbcL are good barcodes for delineating intra and infraspecific distances at single loci level. However, among the combinations, matK + trnH-psbA , rpoB + atpF-atpH + matK are the best barcodes in delineating cowpea subvariants. rbcL gene can be a suitable barcode marker at single locus level, but overall, multi locus approach appears more informative than single locus approach. The present study hopes to immensely contribute to the scanty body of knowledge on the novelty of DNA barcoding in cataloguing closely related cowpea variants at molecular level and hopes to open up future research on genomics and the possibility of use of conserved regions within DNA in inferring phylogenetic relationships among Kenyan cowpea variants.
Kress, W.J., Wurdack, K.J., Zimmer, E.A., Weigt, L.A. and Janzen, D.H. (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 8369-8374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503123102
Hollingsworth, P.M., Forrest, L.L., Spouges, J.L., Hajibabaei, M., Ratnasingham, S., van der Bank, M., Chase, M.W., Cowan, R.S., Erickson, D.L., Fazekas, A.J., Graham, S.W., James, K.E., Kim, K.-J., Kress, W.J., Schneider, H., van AlphenStahl, J., Barrett, S.C.H., van den Berg, C., Bogarin, D., Burgess, K.S., Cameron, K.M., Carine, M., Chacón, J., Clark, A., Clarkson, J.J., Conrad, F., Devey, D.S., Ford, C.S., Hedderson, T.A.J., Hollingsworth, M.L., et al. (2009) A DNA Barcode for Land Plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12794-12797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106
Neuhaus, H. and Link, G. (1987) The Chloroplast tRNALys (UUU) Gene from Mustard (Sinapsis alba) Contains a Class II Intron Potentially Coding for a Maturase-Related Polypeptide. Current Genetics, 11, 251-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00355398
Barthet, M.M. and Hilu, K.W. (2007) Expression of matK: Functional and Evolutionary Implications. American Journal of Botany, 94, 1402-1412. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.8.1402
Mu¨ller, K.F., Borsch, T. and Hilu, K.W. (2006) Phylogenetic Utility of Rapidly Evolving DNA at High Taxonomical Levels: Contrasting matK, trnT-F and rbcL in Basal Angiosperms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 41, 99-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.017
Babbar, S.B., Raghuvanshi, S., Singh, H.K., Parveen, I. and Malik, S. (2012) An Overview of the DNA Barcoding of Plants. Phytomorphology, 62, 69-99.
Cameron, K.M. (2005) Leave It to the Leaves: A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Malaxideae (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany, 92, 1025-1032. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.6.1025
Min, X.J. and Hickey, D.A. (2007) Assessing the Effect of Varying Sequence Length on DNA Barcoding of Fungi. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 365-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01698.x
CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA Barcode for Land Plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12794-12797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106
Chen, S., Yao, H., Han, J., Liu, C., Song, J., Shi, L., Zhu, Y., Ma, X., Gao, T., Pang, X., Luo, K., Li, Y., Li, X., Jia, X., Lin, Y. and Leon, C. (2010) Validation of the ITS2 Region as a Novel DNA Barcode for Identifying Medicinal Plant Species. PLoS ONE, 5, e8613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008613
Fazekas, A.J., Burgess, K.S., Kesanakurti, P.R., Graham, S.W., Newmaster, S.G., Husband, B.C., et al. (2008) Multiple Multilocus DNA Barcodes from the Plastid Genome Discriminate Plant Species Equally Well. PLoS ONE, 3, e2802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002802
Lahaye, R., Van Der Bank, M., Bogarin, D., Warner, J., Pupulin, F., Gigot, G., Maurin, O., Duthoit, S., Barraclough, T.G. and Savolainen, V. (2008) DNA Barcoding the Floras of Biodiversity Hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 2923-2928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709936105
Blaxter, M.L. (2004) The Promise of DNA Taxonomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 359, 669-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1447
Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Schilling, E.E. and Small, R.L. (2007) Comparison of Whole Chloroplast Genome Sequences to Choose Noncoding Regions for Phylogenetic Studies in Angiosperms: The Tortoise and the Hare III. American Journal of Botany, 94, 275-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.3.275
Kress, W.J. and Erickson, D.L. (2007) A Two-Locus Global DNA Barcode for Land Plants: The Coding rbcL Gene Complements the Non-Coding trnH-psbA Spacer Region. PLoS ONE, 2, e508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000508
Shaw, J. and Small, R.L. (2005) Chloroplast DNA Phylogeny and Phylogeography of the North American Plums (Prunus Subgenus Prunus Section Prunocerasus, Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 92, 2011-2030. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.12.2011
Chang (2006) The Chloroplast Genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Rate with That of Grasses and Its Phylogenetic Implications. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 279-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj029
Whitlock, B.A., Hale, A.M. and Groff, P.A. (2010) Intraspecific Inversions Pose a Challenge for the trnH-psbA Plant DNA Barcode. PLoS ONE, 5, e11533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011533
Nicolalde-Morejón, F., Vergara-Silva, F., González-Astorga, J., Stevenson, D.W., Vovides, A.P., et al. (2010) A Character-Based Approach in the Mexican Cycads Supports Diverse Multigene Combinations for DNA Barcoding. Cladistics, 26, 1-15.
Wang, W., Wu, Y., Yan, Y., Ermakova, M., Kerstetter, R. and Messing, J. (2010) DNA Barcoding of the Lemnaceae, a Family of Aquatic Monocots. BMC Plant Biology, 10, 205. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/10/205-BMC Plant Biology 10:205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-205
Chase, M.W., Cowan, R.S., Hollingsworth, P.M., van den Berg, C., Madrinan, S., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Jorgsensen, T., Cameron, K.M., Carine, M., Pedersen, N., Hedderson, T.A.J., Conrad, F., Salazar, G.A., Richardson, J.E., Hollingsworth, M.L., Barraclough, T.G., Kelly, L. and Wilkinson, M. (2007) A Proposal for a Standardised Protocol to Barcode All Land Plants. Taxon, 56, 295-299.
Sass, C., Little, D.P., Stevenson, D.W. and Specht, C.D. (2007) DNA Barcoding in the Cycadales: Testing the Potential of Proposed Barcoding Markers for Species Identification of Cycads. PLoS ONE, 2, e1154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001154
Kress, W.J., Wurdack, K.J., Zimmer, E.A., Weigt, L.A. and Janzen, D.H. (2005) Use of DNA Barcodes to Identify Flowering Plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 8369-8374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503123102
Newmaster, S.G., Fazekas, A.J. and Ragupathy, S. (2006) DNA Barcoding in Land Plants: Evaluation of rbcL in a Multigene Tiered Approach. Canadian Journal of Botany, 84, 335-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b06-047
Chase, M.W., Cowan, R.S., Hollingsworth, P.M., van den Berg, C., Madrinan, S., Petersen, G. and Fay, M. (2009) Barcoding of Plants and Fungi. Science, 325, 682-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1176906
Erickson, D.L., Spouge, J., Resch, A., Weigt, L.A. and Kress, J.W. (2008) DNA Barcoding in Land Plants: Developing Standards to Quantify and Maximize Success. Taxon, 57, 1304-1316.
Kane, N.C. and Cronk, Q. (2008) Botany without Borders: Barcoding in Focus. Molecular Ecology, 17, 5175-5176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03972.x
Hebert, P.D.N., Stoeckle, M.Y., Zemlak, T.S. and Francis, C.M. (2004) Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biology, 2, e312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312
Pennisi, E. (2007) Tax-onomy. Wanted: A Barcode for Plants. Science, 318, 190-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.318.5848.190
Kane, N., Sveinsson, S., Dempewolf, H., Yang, J.Y., Zhang, D., Engels, J.M.M. and Cronk, Q. (2012) Ultra-Barcoding in Cacao (Theobroma spp., Malvaceae) Using Whole Chloroplast Genomes and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA. American Journal of Botany, 99, 320-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100570
Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L. and de Waard, J.R. (2003) Biological Identifications through DNA Barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 313-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Yang, J.B., Tang, M., Li, H.T., Zhang, Z.R. and Li, D.Z. (2013) Complete Chloroplast Genome of the Genus Cymbidium: Lights into the Species Identification Phylogenetic Implications and Population Genetic Analyses. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13, 84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-84
Nock, C.J., Waters, D.L., Edwards, M.A., Bowen, S.G., Rice, N., Cordeiro, G.M. and Henry, R.J. (2011) Chloroplast Genome Sequences from Total DNA for Plant Identification. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 9, 328-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00558.x
Sucher, N.J. and Carles, M.C. (2008) Genome-Based Approaches to the Authentication of Medicinal Plants. Planta Medica, 74, 603-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1074517
Brinkman, F.S.L. (2001) Phylogenetic Analysis. In: Baxevanis, A.D. and Francis Ouellette, B.F., Eds., Bioinformatics: A Practical Guide to the Analysis of Genes and Proteins, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Vancouver, Vol. 2, 323-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471223921.ch14
Collins, R.A., Boykin, L.M., Cruickshank, R.H. and Armstrong, K.F. (2012) Barcoding’s Next Top Model?: An Evaluation of Nucleotide Substitution Models for Specimen Identification. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 457-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00176.x
Whitley, E. and Ball, J. (2002) Statistics Review 6?: Nonparametric Methods. Critical Care, 6, 509-513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1820
Meyer, C.P. and Paulay, G. (2005) DNA Barcoding: Error Rates Based on Comprehensive Sampling. PLoS Biology, 3, 2229-2238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422