While the mutational processes that subsume biological diversity can be revealed in great detail through phylogenetic inferencing using plastid markers, few studies document their use. Accurate phylogenic inference can provide a framework for addressing a host of important evolutionary questions including a context to reconstruct molecular evolution of an organism. Despite the obvious utility of plastid markers in illuminating biological enquiry, many important questions still abound. The use of cp- DNA gene sequence data for phylogenetic inference can have an enormous impact on plant phylogenetics and systematics. The repertoire of genetic diversity of Kenya’s Gene Bank repositories can be explored based on cp -genome signatures. This is because cp- DNA-based mutational changes are an important additional tool to the previous evidence available on plant evolution yet to be explored in biodiversity studies in Kenya. Taken together, these evolutionary changes can inspire development of realistic algorithms for phylogenetic inferencing based on molecular data. Phylogenetic reconstructions are at the very core of molecular evolution. Comparative sequence analyses of plastid markers can have utility beyond the study of phylogeny. The pattern of nucleotide substitution observed over evolutionary time can reflect functional constraints imposed due to natural selection. In line with this, it is possible to detect subtle anatomical variations associated with small fitness effects that can account for genetic diversity at varietal level. The lack of sequence information in Kenyan cowpea has limited the robust advancement of molecular markers use in dissecting diversity based on the putative plastid markers [1] . The present study sought to generate and upscale novel technologies such as genomics, DNA barcoding and bio-informatics in understanding molecular diversity of cowpea accessions from the Gene Bank of Kenya and ecotypes. A total of 298 sequences of cowpea germplasm conserved as in situ and ex situ in Kenya but sourced from phylogeographically diverse settings were examined and their genetic profiles were characterized and evaluated using molecular tools. The Gene Bank materials were purposefully sampled to develop subsets representative of the diversity in the genepool’s collection. We present an extensive study on characterizing the genetic diversity of cp -DNA gene sequence data for the cowpea accessions from the Nation Gene Bank of Kenya. The comparative sequence analyses and phylogenetic clustering of seven plastid markers widely used in the DNA barcoding of land plants provide insights on the molecular evolution of this vascular plant. The detailed and in-depth genome characterization herein greatly enriches the genetic profile of this important crop, which can help in reconstructing realistic models of mutational process during plant evolutionary history. This study addressed this gap by employing a DNA barcode library for cowpea to determine the loci that yield the best species resolution. As well, this study examined the efficacy of custom DNA barcode loci for identification success, and compared phylogenetic diversity measures between sites and among variants.
Okoth, P., Muoma, J., Emmanuel, M., Clabe, W., Omayio, D.O. and Angienda, P.O. (2016) The Potential of DNA Barcode-Based Delineation Using Seven Putative Candidate Loci of the Plastid Region in Inferring Molecular Diversity of Cowpea at Sub-Species Level. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajmb
Chase, M.W., Cowan, R.S., Hollingsworth, P.M., van den Berg, C., Madrinan, S., Petersen, G. and Fay, M.F. (2009) Barcoding of Plants and Fungi. Science, 325, 682-683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176906
Mohler, V. and Schwarz, G. (2008) Genotyping Tools in Plant Breeding: From Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms to Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. Molecular Marker Systems in Plant Breeding and Crop Improvement, 55, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26538-4_2
Müller, K.F., Borsch, T. and Hilu, K.W. (2006) Phylogenetic Utility of Rapidly Evolving DNA at High Taxonomical Levels: Contrasting matK, trnT-F and rbcL in Basal Angiosperms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 41, 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.017
Hilu, K.W., Borsch, T., Müller, K., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, S.S., Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W., Powell, M.P., Alice, I.A., Evans, R., Sauquet, H., Neinhuis, C., Slotta, T.A.B., Jens, G.R., Campbell, C.S. and Chatrou, I.W. (2003) Angiosperm Phylogeny Based on matK Sequence Information. American Journal of Botany, 90, 1758-1776. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.12.1758
Johnson, L.A. and Soltis, D.E. (1994) matK DNA Sequences and Phylogenetic Reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. str. Systematic Botany, 19, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419718
Soltis, D.E. and Soltis, P.S. (2004) Amborella Not a ‘‘Basal Angiosperm’’? Not so Fast. American Journal of Botany, 91, 997-1001. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.6.997
Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Schilling, E.E. and Small, R.L. (2007) Comparison of Whole Chloroplast Genome Sequences to Choose Noncoding Regions for Phylogenetic Studies in Angiosperms: The Tortoise and the Hare III. American Journal of Botany, 94, 275-288. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.3.275
Kress, W.J. and Erickson, D.L. (2007) A Two-Locus Global DNA Barcode for Land Plants: The Coding rbcL Gene Complements the Non-Coding trnH-psbA Spacer Region. PLoS ONE, 2, e508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000508
Shaw, J. and Small, R.L. (2005) Chloroplast DNA Phylogeny and Phylogeography of the North American Plums (Prunus subgenus Prunus Section Prunocerasus, Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 92, 2011-2030. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.12.2011
Chang (2006) The Chloroplast Genome of Phalaenopsis Aphrodite (Orchidaceae): Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Rate with that of Grasses and Its Phylogenetic Implications. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj029
Whitlock, B.A., Hale, A.M. and Groff, P.A. (2010) Intraspecific Inversions Pose a Challenge for the trnH-psbA Plant DNA Barcode. PLoS ONE, 5, e11533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011533
Kress, W.J. and Erickson, D.L. (2007) A Two-Locus Global DNA Barcode for Land Plants: The Coding rbcL Gene Complements the Non-Coding trnH-psbA Spacer Region. PLoS ONE, 2, e508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000508
Chase, M.W., Cowan, R.S., Hollingsworth, P.M., van den Berg, C., Madrinan, S., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Jorgsensen, T., Cameron, K.M., Carine, M., Pedersen, N., Hedderson, T.A.J., Conrad, F., Salazar, G.A., Richardson, J.E., Hollingsworth, M.L., Barraclough, T.G., Kelly, L. and Wilkinson, M. (2007) A Proposal for a Standardised Protocol to Barcode All Land Plants. Taxon, 56, 295-299.
Babbar, S.B., Raghuvanshi, S., Singh, H.K., Parveen, I. and Malik, S. (2012) An Overview of the DNA Barcoding of Plants. Phytomorphology, 62, 69-99.
Heinze, B. (2007) A Database of PCR Primers for the Chloroplast Genomes of Higher Plants. Plant Methods, 3, 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-3-4
Neuhaus, H. and Link, G. (1987) The Chloroplast tRNALys (UUU) Gene from Mustard (Sinapsis alba) Contains a Class II Intron Potentially Coding for a Maturase-Related Polypeptide. Current Genetics, 11, 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355398
Barthet, M.M. and Hilu, K.W. (2007) Expression of matK: Functional and Evolutionary Implications. American Journal of Botany, 94, 1402-1412. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.8.1402
Cameron, K.M. (2005) Leave It to the Leaves: A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Malaxideae (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany, 92, 1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.6.1025
Hickey, D.A. and Min, X.J. (2007) Assessing the Effect of Varying Sequence Length on DNA Barcoding of Fungi. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01698.x
Kress, W.J., Wurdack, K.J., Zimmer, E.A., Weigt, L.A. and Janzen, D.H. (2005) Use of DNA Barcodes to Identify Flowering Plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 8369-8374. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503123102
CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA Barcode for Land Plants. PNAS, 106, 12794-12797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106
Nicolalde-Morejón, F., Vergara-Silva, F., González-Astorga, J., Stevenson, D.W. and Vovides, A.P. (2010) A Character-Based Approach in the Mexican Cycads Supports Diverse Multigene Combinations for DNA Barcoding. Cladistics, 26, 1-15.
Wang, W., Freeman, W.H., Wu, Y., Yan, Y., Ermakova, M., Kerstetter, R. and Messing, J. (2010) DNA Barcoding of the Lemnaceae, a Family of Aquatic Monocots. BMC Plant Biology, 10, 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-205 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/10/205
McNeal, J.R., Kuehl, J.V., Boore, J.L. and de Pamphilis, C.W. (2007) Complete Plastid Genome Sequences Suggest Strong Selection for Retention of Photosynthetic Genes in the Parasitic Plant Genus Cuscuta. BMC Plant Biology, 7, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-7-57
Lahaye, et al. (2008) DNA Barcoding the Floras of Biodiversity Hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 2923-2928. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709936105
Guisinger, M.M., Kuehl, J.V., Boore, J.L. and Jansen, R.K. (2008) Genome-Wide Analyses of Geraniaceae Plastid DNA Reveal Unprecedented Patterns of Increased Nucleotide Substitutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 18424-18429. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806759105
Adekambi, T., Drancourt, M. and Raoult, D. (2008) The rpoB Gene as a Tool for Clinical Microbiologists. Trends in Microbiology, 17, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.09.008
Liu, Q., Triplett, J.K., Wen, J. and Peterson, M. (2011) Allotetraploid Origin and Divergence in Eleusine (Chloridoideae, Poaceae): Evidence from Low-Copy Nuclear Gene Phylogenies and a Plastid Gene Chronogram. Annals of Botany, 108, 1287-1298. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr231
Baldauf, S.L. (2003) Phylogeny for the Faint of Heart: A Tutorial. Trends in Genetics, 19, 345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00112-4
Linder, C.R. and Warnow, T. (2005) An Overview of Phylogeny Reconstruction. In: Aluru, S., Ed., the Handbook of Computational Molecular Biology, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 40.
Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987) The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4, 406-425.
Zuckerkandl, E. and Pauling, L. (1965) Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins. In: Bryson, V. and Vogel, H.J., Eds., Evolving Genes and Proteins, Academic Press, Cambridge, 97-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6
Edwards, S.V. (2009) Is a New and General Theory of Molecular Systematics Emerging? Evolution, 63, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00549.x
Grenfell, B.T. (2004) Unifying the Epidemiological and Evolutionary Dynamics of Pathogens. Science, 303, 327-332. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090727
Salipante, S.J. and Horwitz, M.S. (2006) Phylogenetic Fate Mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 5448-5453. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601265103
Gregory, T.R. (2005) DNA Barcoding Does Not Compete with Taxonomy. Nature, 434, 1067. https://doi.org/10.1038/4341067b
Brady, A. and Salzberg, S. (2011) PhymmBL Expanded: Confidence Scores, Custom Databases, Parallelization and More. Nature Methods, 8, 367. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0511-367
Pedersen, J.S. (2013) Identification and Classification of Conserved RNA Secondary Structures in the Human Genome. PLOS Computational Biology, 2, e33. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020033
Gronau, I., Hubisz, M.J., Gulko, B., Danko, C.G. and Siepel, A. (2011) Bayesian Inference of Ancient Human Demography from Individual Genome Sequences. Nature Genetics, 43, 1031-1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.937
Kingman, J.F.C. (1982) On the Genealogy of Large Populations. Journal of Applied Probability, 19A, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/3213548
Felsenstein, J. (2004) Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
Kumar, L.S. (1999) DNA Markers in Plant Improvement: An Overview. Biotechnology Advances, 17, 143-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(98)00018-4
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acid Research, 22, 4673-4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
Tamura, K., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2004) Prospects for Inferring Very Large Phylogenies by Using the Neighbor-Joining Method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 11030-11035. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404206101
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
Jukes, T.H. and Cantor, C.R. (1969) Evolution of Protein Molecules. In: Munro, H.N., Ed., Mammalian Protein Metabolism, Academic Press, New York, 21-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1596-1599.
Tamura, K., Peterson, N., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 2731-2739.
Hall, T.A. (1999) BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, 41, 95-98.
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. and Kumar, S. (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 2725-2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2000) Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York.
Sass, C., Little, D.P., Stevenson, D.W. and Specht, C.D. (2007) DNA Barcoding in the Cycadales: Testing the Potential of Proposed Barcoding Markers for Species Identification of Cycads. PLoS ONE, 2, e1154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001154
Guindon, S. and Gascuel, O. (2003) A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood. Systematic Biology, 52, 696-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520
Newmaster, S.G., Fazekas, A.J. and Ragupathy, S. (2006) DNA Barcoding in Land Plants. Evaluation of rbcL in a Multigene Tiered Approach. Canadian Journal of Botany, 84, 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1139/b06-047
Wiemers, M. and Fiedler, K. (2007) Does the DNA Barcoding Gap Exist? A Case Study in Blue Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycanidae). Frontiers in Zoology, 4, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-4-8
Meier, R., Shiyang, K., Vaidya, G. and Ng, P.K.L. (2006) DNA Barcoding and Taxonomy.
Virgilio, M., Backeljau, T., Nevado, B. and De Meyer, M. (2010) Comparative Performances of DNA Barcoding across Insect Orders. BMC Bioinformatics, 1, 209-235. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-206
Collins, R.A., Boykin, L.M., Cruickshank, R.H. and Armstrong, K.F. (2012) Barcoding’s Next Top Model: An Evaluation of Nucleotide Substitution Models for Specimen Identification. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00176.x
Kwak, M. and Gepts, P. (2009) Structure of Genetic Diversity in the Two Major Gene Pools of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 118, 979-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0955-4
Angioi, S.A., Desiderio, F., Rau, D., Bitocchi, E., Attene, G. and Papa, R. (2009) Development and Use of Chloroplast Microsatellites in Phaseolus spp. and Other Legumes. Plant Biology, 11, 598-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00143.x
Rossi, M., Bitocchi, E., Bellucci, E., Nanni, L., Rau, D., Attene, G. and Papa, R. (2009) Linkage Disequilibrium and Population Structure in Wild and Domesticated Populations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Evolutionary Applications, 2, 504-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00082.x
Burle, M.L., Fonseca, J.R., Kami, J.A. and Gepts, P. (2010) Microsatellite Diversity and Genetic Structure among Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Landraces in Brazil, a Secondary Center of Diversity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 121, 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1350-5
Hollingsworth, P.M., Forrest, L.L., Spouges, J.L., Hajibabaei, M., Ratnasingham, S., van der Bank, M., Chase, M.W., Cowan, R.S., Erickson, D.L., Fazekas, A.J., Graham, S.W., James, K.E., Kim, K.-J., Kress, W.J., Schneider, H., van AlphenStah, J., Barrett, S.C.H., van den Berg, C., Bogarin, D., Burgess, K.S., Cameron, K.M., Carine, M., Chacón, J., Clark, A., Clarkson, J.J., Conrad, F., Devey, D.S., Ford, C.S., Hedderson, T.A.J., Hollingsworth, M.L., et al. (2009) A DNA Barcode for Land Plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 12794-12797.