PERT and CPM in Project Management with Practical Examples
- 1 Department of Management Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Abstract
This paper reviewed the concepts of Project Evaluation Review Technique and Critical Path Method in project management with practical examples. The methods and success of quantitative decision-making approaches in project management through t he use of project evaluation review technique and the critical path method as regards project duration and critical activities of a project, were discussed. The review found that while both methods are effective in achieving success in project management, the relationship and connectivity of activities involved in a project life cycle are key aspects. The paper concludes that the project evaluation review technique is more effective when the duration of the project is uncertain, while the critical path method is effective when the project’s end time is certain. The paper, therefore, recommends that to achieve maximum operative efficiency in utilizing resources in project management, p rior to commencing the execution of a project, all required resources to cover every activity must be assembled and prioritized to eliminate interruptions that could bring delay and unnecessary cost implications. Again, policies focused on improving project execution should be implemented in developing nations to minimize the many cases of failed and delayed projects. Subsequently, stakeholders in projects must be given the right, under the law, to prosecute the government, its agencies and/or the executors of projects for failure to execute a project on schedule.
- Samman, T.A.S.A. and Brahemi, R.M.R.A (2014) Fuzzy Pert for Project Management. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 7, 1150-1159.
- Madhuni, K.U., Siresha, S. and Shamkar, N.R. (2012) A New Approach for Solving Fuzzy Critical Path Problem Using L.L. Fuzzy Numbers. European Journal of Operations Research, 43, 174-183.
- Gopalasamy, P. and Mansor, Z. (2013) An Investigation on Project Management Standard Practices in IT Organization. International Journal of Computer Engineering Science, 3, 1-10.
- Bagshaw, K.B. (2011) Quantitative Analysis for Business Decisions. Port Harcourt: Nybraide Enterprises, Nigeria.
- Singh, S. (2017) Project Management and Strategic Objectives of the Organization. Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5, 10-11. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujibm.2017.050102
- Stuckenbruck, L.C. (1986) Project Management Framework (An Overview of the Project Management Body of Knowledge). Project Management Journal, 17, 25-30.
- Heagney, J. (2011) Fundamentals of Project Management. 4th Edition, American Management Association, New York.
- Tomomitsu, H.T.A., Carvalha, M.M.D. and Moraes, R.D.O. (2018) The Evaluation of the Relationship Between Project Management and Knowledge Management: A Bibliometric Study. Gestão & Produção, 25, 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3150-16
- Kumar, V.K. and Ganesh, L.S. (1998) Use of Petri Nets for Resource Allocation in Projects, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.658660
- Bagshaw, K.B. (2017) Decision Analysis for Managers: Quantitative Approach. Port Harcourt: Branded Favour Media, Nigeria.