Integrated Design Approach for Solving Complexity of Design Problem
- 1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, KMUTNB, Bangkok, Thailand
- 2 G-SCOP Laboratory, Grenoble Institute of Technology, Grenoble, France
Abstract
The engineering problems today become more and more complex particularly in the area of new product development. It requires the multi-disciplinary design method to solve complex problems. This paper presents an integrated design system for solving complexity during multi-disciplinary design. Complexity could be solved if the design problems, given by any individuals who are concerned, are structured. The design system uses the multi-viewpoint concept to allow experts to share their information and knowledge in common views. Knowledge modules are used to store semantics from the experts of different disciplines. Then the system agent acts as an internal designer to help support the individuals to translate any semantics provided from one discipline and then propagate to other related disciplines. With these tools, the integrated design system can structure and solve the complexity of design problems.
- B. Archer, “What is Design?” 1996. http://atschool.eduweb.co.uk/trinity/watdes.html
- G. Pahl, W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen and K. H. Grote, “Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach,” 3rd Edition, Springer, London, 2007.
- S. C.-Y. Lu and N. P. Suh, “Complexity in Design of Technical Systems,” CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2009, pp. 157-160. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.067
- Y. Akao and G. H. Mazur, “The Leading Edge in QFD: Past, Present and Future,” Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2009, pp. 20-35. doi:10.1108/02656710310453791
- E. Domb, “Using TRIZ to Enhance Quality Functional Deployment,” 2006. http://www.realinnovation.com/content/c080922a.asp
- J. Terninko, “The QFD, TRIZ and Taguchi Connection: Customer-Driven Robust Innovation,” Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, Michigan, 8-10 June 1997, pp. 441-445.
- K. Yang and H. Zhang, “A Comparison of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design,” 2000. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2000/08/d/index.htm
- K. Yang and H. Zhang, “Compatibility Analysis and Case Studies of Axiomatic Design and TRIZ,” 2000. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2000/09/c/index.htm
- N. P. Suh, “The Principles of Design,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990.
- N. P. Suh, “Complexity: Theory and Applications,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
- T. Lee, “Optimal Strategy for Eliminating Coupling Terms from a Design Matrix,” Integrated Design & Process Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2006, pp. 45-55.
- T. Lee and P. N. Jeziorek, “Understanding the Value of Eliminating an Off-Diagonal Term in a Design Matrix,” Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Florence, 13-16 June 2006. http://www.axiomaticdesign.com/technology/icad/icad2006/icad2006_12.pdf
- E. M. Benavides and L. G. Rodriguez, “Extended Algorithm for Design-Matrix Reorganization,” Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Daejeon, 30-31 March 2011, pp. 20-26.
- E. C. Chapa Kasusky, “Tools and Structure for the Formal and Informal Cooperation in a Context of Holonic Design,” Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, Grenoble, 1997.
- D. Brissaud and S. Tichkiewitch, “Innovation and Manufacturability Analysis in an Integrated Design Context,” Computers in Industry, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2000, pp. 111-121. doi:10.1016/S0166-3615(00)00061-0