Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction and Other Stability Analyses of Tef [<i>Eragrostis tef</i> (Zucc.)Trotter] Grain Yield
- 1 South Agricultural Research Institute, Hawassa Agricultural Research Centre, Hawassa, Ethiopia
Abstract
Tef [ Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter]) is one of the most important cereal crops grown in Ethiopia. Tef production has been partly constrained by low yield and less stability of the genotypes under cultivation. Field experiments were carried out in Halaba, Loka Abaya, Bensa and Areka, South Ethiopia, from August to November, during 2016 and 2017 main cropping seasons, in order to estimate yield stability and the association between AMMI analysis and other stability parameters. Experiments were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications using fourteen improved tef genotypes. Mean yield for Halaba, Loka Abaya2016, Loka Abaya2017, Bensa, Areka2016 and Areka2017 was 0.99, 0.45, 0.48, 1.50, 1.62 and 0.77 tons/ha, respectively. Genotypes A marach, Boset, Simada, and Tseday exhibited high mean yield of 1.09, 1.10, 1.07 and 1.07 tons/ha, respectively. AMMI stability value (ASV) ranged from 0.17 (genotype Lakech) to 1.40 (Amarach); yield stability index (YSI) from 7 (Lakech) to 25 (Quncho); and superiority measure ( P i ) from 0.015 (Boset) to 0.145 (Dega Tef). Rank correlation of yield with P i ( r = 0.97, p < 0.01), ASV with W i and δ i 2 ( r = 0.85, p < 0.01) and that between W i and δ i 2 ( r = 1.00, p < 0.01) was high. Rank correlation of YSI with yield ( r = 0.57, p < 0.05) , ASV ( r = 0. 75 , p < 0.0 1), and P i ( r = 0. 68 , p < 0.0 1) and W i and δ i 2 ( r = 0.67, p < 0.01) was also positive. The present study showed that genotypes Etsub, Simada and Tseday would be recommended for high yield and wide adaptation, and ASV would be used alone or jointly with YSI, W i and δ i 2 for ranking of genotyp es.
- CSA (2017) Agricultural Sample Survey: Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, meher Season), 2016/2017 (2009 E.C.), Volume I, Statistical Bulletin 584. Central Statistical Agency (CSA), Addis Ababa.
- Yang, R.C. and Baker, R.J. (1991) Genotype-Environment Interactions in Two Wheat Crosses. Crop Science, 31, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100010021x
- Comstock, R.E. and Moll, R.H. (1963) Genotype x Environment Interactions. In: Symposium on Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding, National Academy Science, National Research Council, Washington DC, 164-196.
- Becker, H.C. (1981) Correlations among Some Statistical Measures of Phenotypic Stability. Euphytica, 30, 835-840.
- Wricke, G. (1962) Uber eine methode zur erfassung der okologischen streubreite in feldversuchen. Z. Pflanzenzuecht, 47, 92-96.
- Shukla, G.K. (1972) Some Statistical Aspects of Partitioning Genotype-Environmental Components of Variability. Heredity, 29, 237-245.
- Lin, C.S. and Binns, M.R. (1988) A Superiority Measure of Cultivar Performance for Cultivar x Location Data. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 68, 193-198. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps88-018
- Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, B.W. (1980) Statistical Methods. 7th Edition, Iowa State University, Ames.
- Zobel,R.W., Wright, M.J. and Gauch, H.G. (1988) Statistical Analysis of a Yield Trial. Agronomy Journal, 80, 388-393. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x
- Gauch, H.G. and Zobel, R.W. (1997) Identifying Mega-Environments and Targeting Genotypes. Crop Science, 37, 311-326. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020002x
- Hongyu, K., Garcia-Pena, M., de Araujo, L.B. and Dias, C.T.S. (2014) Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI Analysis of Genotype × Environment Interaction. Biometrical Letters, 51, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2014-0007
- Neisse, A.C., Kirch, J.L. and Hongyu, K. (2018) AMMI and GGE Biplot for Genotype × Environment Interaction: A Medoid-Based Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Approach for High-Dimensional Data. Biometrical Letters, 55, 97-121. https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2018-0008
- Lin, C.S., Binns, M.R. and Lefkovitch, L.P. (1986) Stability Analysis: Where Do We Stand? Crop Science, 26, 894-900. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x