Broadleaf Weed Control with Halosulfuron Tankmixes in White Bean
- 1 University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ontario, Canada
- 2 University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ontario, Canada
- 3 University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ontario, Canada
Abstract
Six field trials were conducted over a four-year (2017-2020) period near Exeter and Ridgetown, Ontario to determine the efficacy of halosulfuron tankmixes applied postemergence to control broadleaf weeds in white bean. Halosulfuron caused up to 4% injury in white bean at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment (WAT). Bentazon, acifluorfen, fomesafen, bentazon/acifluorfen, and bentazon + fomesafen caused 2% - 16% injury at 2 WAT and up to 3% injury at 4 WAT in white bean. The addition of halosulfuron to the aforementioned herbicides did not accentuate white bean injury. Reduced weed interference with the herbicides evaluated increased white been yield 50% - 90% compared to the weedy control; there was no difference in seed yield among herbicide treatments evaluated. At 4 WAT, halosulfuron at 25, 37.5 and 50 g ai ha-1 controlled velvetleaf 86%, 93% and 97%; redroot pigweed 83%, 85% and 89%; common ragweed 90%, 93% and 94%; common lambsquarters 27%, 28% and 36%; flower-of-an-hour 66%, 76% and 69%; and wild mustard 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Bentazon, acifluorfen, fomesafen, bentazon/acifluorfen, and bentazon + fomesafen controlled velvetleaf 73%, 14%, 52%, 42% and 68%; redroot pigweed 40%, 91%, 85%, 75% and 80%; common ragweed 36%, 81%, 92%, 68% and 84%; common lambsquarters 87%, 39%, 48%, 60% and 76%; flower-of-an-hour 90%, 66%, 63%, 73% and 83%; and wild mustard 97%, 97%, 100%, 99% and 100%, respectively. Halosulfuron tankmixed with bentazon, acifluorfen, fomesafen, bentazon/acifluorfen or bentazon + fomesafen controlled velvetleaf 90%, 51%, 68%, 75% and 90%; redroot pigweed 80%, 99%, 95%, 92% and 91%; common ragweed up to 94%, 97%, 93%, 94% and 95%; common lambsquarters 74%, 62%, 43%, 62% and 66%; flower-of-an-hour 92%, 78%, 74%, 82% and 87%; and wild mustard 100%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Weed density and dry biomass followed the same trend. This study concludes that the optimal halosulfuron tankmix is broadleaf weed species specific for weed management in dry bean production.
- Hensall District Co-Operative (2020) Coloured Beans Seed. https://www.hdc.on.ca
- Messina, V. (2014) Nutritional and Health Benefits of Dried Beans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100, 437-442. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.071472
- [OMAFRA] Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food and Rural Affairs (2021) Area, Yield, Production and Farm Value of Specified Field Crops, Ontario, 2012-2021.
- Soltani, N., Dille, J.A., Burke, I.C., Everman, W.J., VanGessel, M.J., Davis, V.M. and Sikkema, P.H. (2018) Potential Yield Loss in Dry Bean Crops Due to Weeds in the United States and Canada. Weed Technology, 32, 342-346. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.116
- Soltani, N., Dille, J.A., Burke, I.C., Everman, W.J., VanGessel, M.J., Davis, V.M. and Sikkema, P.H. (2017) Perspectives on Potential Soybean Yield Losses from Weeds in North America. Weed Technology, 31, 148. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2016.2
- Soltani, N., Dille, J.A., Burke, I.C., Everman, W.J., VanGessel, M.J., Davis, V.M. and Sikkema, P.H. (2016) Potential Corn Yield Losses from Weeds in North America. Weed Technology, 30, 979-984. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-16-00046.1
- Flessner, M.L., Burke I.C., Dille, J.A., Everman, W.J., VanGessel, M.J., Tidemann, B., Soltani, N., and Sikkema, P.H. (2021) Potential Wheat Yield Loss Due to Weeds in the United States and Canada. Weed Technology. (Under Review)
- [OMAFRA] Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food and Rural Affairs (2020) Guide to Weed Control, Publication 75. Toronto, 1-457.
- Duggleby, R.G., McCourt, J.A. and Guddat, L.W. (2008) Structure and Mechanism of Inhibition of Plant Acetohydroxyacid Synthase. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 46, 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.12.004
- Shaner, D.L. (2014) Herbicide Handbook. Tenth Edition, Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, 513 p.
- Wilson, R.G. (2005) Response of Dry Bean and Weeds to Fomesafen and Fomesafen Tank Mixtures. Weed Technology, 19, 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-166R
- Peachey, E., Doohan, D. and Koch, T. (2012) Selectivity of Fomesafen Based Systems for Preemergence Weed Control in Cucurbit Crops. Crop Protection, 40, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.04.003
- Soltani, N., Shropshire, C. and Sikkema, P.H. (2012) Response of Dry Bean to Halosulfuron Applied Postemergence. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 92, 723-728. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2011-220