Stable Carbon Isotope Discrimination (<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C) of Cotton Burrs and Seeds as a Season-Long Integrator of Crop Water Stress
- 1 Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, ARS-USDA1, Lubbock, USA
- 2 Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, ARS-USDA1, Lubbock, USA
- 3 Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, ARS-USDA1, Lubbock, USA
Abstract
Plant-based irrigation management schemes typically use surrogates such as canopy temperature, alone, or in conjunction with environmental variables, to infer the degree of “crop stress” (biological strain) induced by drought. Few systematic studies of the relationship between “crop stress”, as defined by such surrogates, and physiological estimates of water use efficiency (WUE) exist over both daily and seasonal time scales relevant to agronomic irrigation control. The systematic application of stable carbon isotope discrimination ( δ 13 C) might allow post hoc evaluation of irrigation scheduling schemes and might also be a useful germplasm screening tool if the source(s) of variability can be uncovered and/or controlled. Results from preliminary efforts comparing leaf and cotton seed δ 13 C to season-long water deficits showed that seeds are more useful indicators of season-long water stress and water use efficiency during crop development.
- Lichtenthaler, H.K. (1998) The Stress Concept in Plants: An Introduction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 851, 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08993.x
- English, M. and Raja, S.N. (1996) Perspectives on Deficit Irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 32, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(96)01255-3
- Jones, H.G. (2004) Irrigation Scheduling: Advantages and Pitfalls of Plant-Based Methods. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2427-2436. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh213
- Cernusak, L.A., Ubierna, N., Winter, K., Holtum, J.A.M., Marshall, J.D. and Farquhar, G.D. (2013) Environmental and Physiological Determinants of Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Terrestrial Plants. New Phytologist, 200, 950-965. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12423
- Stiller, W.N., Read, J.J., Constable, G.A. and Reid, P.E. (2005) Selection for Water Use Efficiency Traits in a Cotton Breeding Program: Cultivar Differences. Crop Science, 45, 1107-1113. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0545
- Stout, J.E. and Goebel, T. (2022) Plant Stress & Water Conservation Meteorological Tower, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Lubbock. https://www.ars.usda.gov/plains-area/lubbock-tx/cropping-systems-research- laboratory/wind-erosion-and-water-conservation-research/docs/pswc-met-tower-data
- Baker, J.T., Mahan, J.R., Gitz, D.C., Lascano, R.J. and Ephrath, J.E. (2012) Comparison of Deficit Irrigation Scheduling Methods That Use Canopy Temperature Measurements. Plant Biosystems, 147, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2012.736423
- Farquhar, G.D., Ehleringer, J.R. and Hubick, K.T. (1989) Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 40, 503-547. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443
- Nguyen-Queyrens, A., Ferhi, A., Loustau, D. and Guehl, J.-M. (1998) Within-Ring δ13C Spatial Variability and Interannual Variations in Wood Cellulose of Two Contrasting Provenances of Pinus pinaster. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 766-773. https://doi.org/10.1139/x98-044
- Nielsen-Gammon, J.W. (2012) The 2011 Texas Drought. Texas Water Journal, 3, 59-95.
- Gu, Z., Qi, Z., Burghate, R., Yuan, S., Jiao, X. and Xu, J. (2020) Irrigation Scheduling Approaches and Applications: A Review. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 146, Article ID: 04020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001464