Estimation of Peanut Maturity Using Color Image Analysis
- 1 Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- 2 Department of Plant Environmental Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
- 3 Department of Plant Environmental Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
- 4 University of Georgia-Athens Cooperative Extension, Athens, GA, USA
- 5 Panhandle Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Scottsbluff, NE, USA
- 6 Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville, SC, USA
Abstract
Peanuts pods grow underground and mature unevenly, resulting that choosing the correct time to harvest is more complicated than other crops. Pod maturity can be determined by blasting with a pressure washer to remove outer skin of the pod (exocarp) to expose the color of the middle layer (mesocarp). The mesocarp color changes with maturity from white to yellow, orange, brown and finally black. The sum of percentage from orange, brown, and black mesocarp (OBB) color and black color (BL) represents the kernels that are mature enough to harvest. The goal of this research is to identify methodologies to estimate OBB and BL of the pods using RGB images taken in the field and validate the proposed model using other pod images. The Mahalanobis distance classification method was used to process sets of images and calculate pod area (number of pixels) corresponding to two classes (mesocarp and background) with nine different color groups. The results showed a performance of 94% effectiveness for mesocarp using Mahalanobis distance classification. Statistical regression for OBB and BL was developed based on 315 images of peanut pods taken from the field. The R 2 and root mean square error of predicted and actual OBB were 0.93 and 4.1%, respectively. The R 2 and root mean square error of predicted and actual BL were 0.88 and 1.8%, respectively. The validation of OBB using other images provided reasonable estimation (R 2 = 0.98 and RMSE = 2.73%). This study introduces a novel, cost-effective, and non-destructive method for estimating peanut maturity using RGB imagery and Mahalanobis distance classification in the field. This innovative approach addresses the limitations of traditional methods and offers a robust alternative for real-time maturity assessment.
- USDA (2023) Georgia Leads U.S. Production of Peanuts, Outproducing All Other States Combined. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=106192
- USDA (2016) USDA Commodity Requirements. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2000007618%20-%20Peanut%20Products%20CRD.pdf
- Sanders, T.H., Williams, E.J., Schubert, A.M. and Pattee, H.E. (1980) Peanut Maturity Method Evaluations. I. Southeast. Peanut Science , 7, 78-82. https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-7-2-5
- Rowland, D.L., Sorensen, R.B., Butts, C.L. and Faircloth, W.H. (2006) Determination of Maturity and Degree Day Indices and Their Success in Predicting Peanut Maturity. Peanut Science , 33, 125-136.
- Rowland, D.L., Sorensen, R.B., Butts, C.L. and Faircloth, W.H. (2006) Determination of Maturity and Degree Day Indices and Their Success in Predicting Peanut Maturity1. Peanut Science , 33, 125-136. https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679(2006)33[125:domadd]2.0.co;2
- College of Agriculture, Forestry and Sciences (2024) 2024 South Carolina Pest Management Handbook. https://www.clemson.edu/extension/agronomy/_files/pest-management-handbook-clemson-extension.pdf
- University of Florida (2013) Peanut Maturity Update. http://nwdistrict.ifas.ufl.edu/phag/2013/08/16/peanut-maturity-update/
- Ghate, S.R., Evans, M.D., Kvien, C.K. and Rucker, K.S. (1993) Maturity Detection in Peanuts (Arachis Hypogaea L.) Using Machine Vision. Transactions of the ASAE , 36, 1941-1947. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28546
- University of Georgia (2003) Cooperative Extension Service. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/60440000/ResearchandExtensionReports/2003GAReport.pdf
- Williams, E.J. and Drexler, J.S. (1981) A Non-Destructive Method for Determining Peanut Pod Maturity. Peanut Science , 8, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-8-2-15
- Baldwin, J.A., and Beasley, J.P. (1990) Producing Quality Peanuts. University of Georgia-Athens.
- Boldor, D., Sanders, T.H., Swartzel, K.R. and Simunovic, J. (2002) Computer-Assisted Color Classification of Peanut Pods1. Peanut Science , 29, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.3146/pnut.29.1.0008
- Colvin, B.C., Rowland, D.L., Ferrell, J.A. and Faircloth, W.H. (2014) Development of a Digital Analysis System to Evaluate Peanut Maturity. Peanut Science , 41, 8-16. https://doi.org/10.3146/ps13-9.1