Edge Effects in Small Forest Fragments: Why More Is Better?
- 1 School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA;
- 2 The Center for Agroforestry, School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA;
- 3 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Abstract
Edge to interior gradients in forest fragments can influence the species composition and community structure as a result of variations in microenvironment and edaphic variables. We investigated the response of microenvironment and edaphic variables to distance from a tropical montane forest (locally known as shola)-grassland edge using one-edge and multiple-edge models. The edpahic variables did not show any differences between the grassland and shola soils. We observed that conventional one-edge models sufficiently explained variation trends in microenvironment along the edge to interior gradient in large fragments. As with other studies on small fragments though, we observed no edge effects with the use of a conventional one-edge model. However, the inclusion of multiple edges in small fragments signifycantly improved model fit. We can conclude that small fragments dominated by edge habitat may in fact resemble larger fragments with the inclusion of multiple edges. Our models did not evaluate non-linear effects which often better explain patterns in edge-interior gradients. The incorporation of such non-linear models in the system might further improve model fit.
- Leopold,A. 1993.Game management. Scribner Sons, New York, USA.
- Johnston, V.R. 1947. Breeding birds of the forest edge in Illinois. Condor 2: 45-53.
- Gates, J.E., Gysel, L.W. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledgling success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59: 871-883.
- Anderson, S.H.,Mann, K. Shugart,H.H. 1977. The effect of transmission-lines corridors on bird populations. American Midland Naturalist 97: 216-221.
- Laurance,W.F., Ferreira,L.V. Rankin-DeMerona, J.M., Laurance, S.G., Hutchings, R.W. Lovejoy, T.E. 1998. Effects of forest fragmentation on recruitment patterns in Amazonian tree communities. Conservation Biology 12: 460-464.
- Gascon, C.G., Williamson, B., da Fonseca, G.A.B. 2000. Receding forest edges and vanishing reserves. Science 288: 1356-1358.
- Malcolm, J.R. 1994. Edge effects in central Amazonian forest fragments. Ecology 75: 2438-2445.
- Jose, S. Gillespie, A.R., Goerge, S.J., Kumar, M.K. 1996. Vegetation response along edge-interior gradients in a high altitude tropical forest in peninsular India. Forest Ecology and Management 87: 51-62.
- Williams-Linera, G., Domínguez, Garcia-Zurita, M.E. 1998. Microenvironment and floristics of different edges in a fragmented tropical rainforest. Conservation Biology 12: 1092-1102.
- Ries, L. Fletcher, R.J., Battin, J. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: Mechanisms, models and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35: 491-522.
- Harper, K.A., MacDonald, S.E. 2002. Structure and composition of edges next to regenerating clear-cuts in mixed-wood boreal forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 535-546.
- Fletcher, R.J. 2005. Multiple edge effects and their implications in fragmented landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 342-352.
- Laurance, W.F., Lovejoy, T.E., Vasconcelos, H.L., Bruna, E.M., Didham, R.D., Stouffer, P.C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R.O., Laurance, S.G., Sampaio, E.G. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-Year investigation. Conservation Biology 16: 605-618.
- Mancke, R.G.,Gavin, T.A.2000. Breeding bird density in woodlots: Effects of depth and buildings at the edges. Ecological Applications 10: 598-611.
- Fernández, C., Acosta, F.J., Abellá, G., López, F., Díaz, M. 2002. Complex edge effect fields as additive processes in patches of ecological systems. Ecological Modelling 149: 273-273.